OpenText Silk Test vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

4,080 Views
2,693 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (22nd), Regression Testing Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (20th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The statistics that are available are very good, the solution offers very good detailed reports, and it's excellent for testing an application's performance levels."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The OCR recognition is great, way over Sikulix or Robot Framework."

"It is a fine product; it is a powerful tool, and it needs commitment."

"It speeds up testing efforts."

"Using this DLL functionality we were able to automate our product."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

Cons

"SilkTest has to improve on Firefox and Chrome as their versions change."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"At the moment, when we are trying to use this tool, we are finding quite a few compatibility issues between the tool and the applications on the test. We wouldn't consider it perfectly stable for that reason."

"GUI interface could be simpler for non-developers."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex if you're deploying on-prem."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

October 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

October 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.