BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared BrowserStack and Tricentis solutions aren't in the same category. BrowserStack is ranked #5 in FT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.8% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 33 BrowserStack reviews

6,453 Views
5,227 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Rishoo Mittal

Managing Technical Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cross-platform testing has accelerated releases and now needs smarter AI-driven test creation

The best features that BrowserStack offers include the ability to run manual and automated tests on real devices. We can create bugs, integrate it with other platforms like Jira or Azure, and use self-healing scripts with Selenium. We also have the test runs for different versions or with different frameworks, not just Selenium but with Playwright as well. Additionally, there are real-time dashboards and notifications sent when tests fail or when we need screenshots or recordings of test executions, and we can easily integrate this into our pipelines. BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization by providing an out-of-the-box solution for whole test executions across different projects for our automobile customers. We have worked on around twenty to thirty projects, and the need for a stable, customizable single test execution platform that supports different platforms has been met. It has helped manage the entire quality assurance of the product efficiently. The measurable improvements due to BrowserStack include a significant efficiency gain, allowing the whole team to collaborate on testing and communicate faster. Also, the easier integration with project management tools has been beneficial. The documentation of findings has improved, which helps us share insights with different project stakeholders.

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"We use BrowserStack for testing on different platforms, and it's a platform that allows us to test on different devices and platforms, which we are using as a regression tool and for testing on different devices."

"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"BrowserStack has positively impacted our organization by improving collaboration and showing quality improvements in releases, with the number of defects leaking into production significantly reduced."

"It allows us to test our development against a huge range of product combinations that we could not realistically maintain in house, and it really adds to our core capabilities."

"BrowserStack has positively impacted my organization primarily through time savings because it is very easy to use and replicates physical devices for testing, which is crucial since we usually do not have physical devices."

More BrowserStack pros

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"One of the valuable features the solution offers is the chance to be able to perform automatic tests by recording, and to create them without having coding knowledge."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"The product has a very good record-and-play functionality."

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

Cons

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

"BrowserStack does not support file upload for automation - the WebDriver used to run tests on mobile devices (real iOS devices in beta (Appium), iOS simulators (iPhoneDriver) and Android emulators (AndroidDriver)) do not support this feature."

"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."

"BrowserStack sometimes works well and other times it is very slow."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

More BrowserStack cons

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"I have had some difficulty trying to configure it on several browsers."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"A company would not be able to scale with just this solution."

"Technical support is an area they need to work on, they are too slow to resolve issues."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

More TestProject [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"The price is fine."

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

I purchased BrowserStack through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

Improvements for BrowserStack could include better usability when working under a private network or a VPN, since it can be challenging to access restricted URLs. There are times when running an au...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BrowserStack?

In the start of my career, I performed functional testing on mobile devices and web applications, and I used BrowserStack for testing web applications and mobile applications for one year. My main ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 10% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs BrowserStack

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 8% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

Galen Framework vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Testim vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More TestProject [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2026

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

October 2026

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Overview

BrowserStack offers a cloud-based testing solution that facilitates comprehensive cross-platform testing for web and mobile apps, allowing efficient testing across devices, browsers, and operating systems without the need for physical hardware.

It provides integration with project management tools and enables parallel and cross-browser testing, enhancing collaboration with an intuitive interface. Support for real devices offers better insight compared to simulators and helps in reducing manual efforts through automation capabilities. Companies benefit from BrowserStack's vast device range that ensures efficient testing and improved quality at a reduced cost.

What are BrowserStack's key features?

Device Diversity: Access a broad range of real devices for testing.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with project management tools.
Parallel Testing: Enables parallel execution to improve efficiency.
Automation: Supports automated testing to reduce manual workload.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by eliminating the need for physical devices.
Improved Testing Quality: Ensures high quality through real device insights.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlined interface for better team cooperation.
Time Savings: Faster testing with parallel execution capabilities.

In industries like software development and IT services, BrowserStack aids businesses in testing compatibility, performance, and responsiveness across platforms, addressing issues like UI challenges and ensuring legacy application support on older systems. Companies utilize it to refine app quality, using tools such as Selenium and APM for comprehensive test automation.

BrowserStack

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.