Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Oracle and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #25, while Worksoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 1.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,374 Views
783 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 68 Worksoft Certify reviews

4,036 Views
3,552 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the test automation category. Worksoft Certify seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features and SAP support, while Oracle Testing Suite excels in load and performance testing, particularly in Oracle ERP contexts.

Features: Worksoft Certify provides automatic test execution without scripts, seamless end-to-end validation, and SAP support with parameter-driven actions and content merge. Oracle Application Testing Suite's strengths lie in load and performance testing using OpenScript, supported by Oracle Test Manager and Oracle Functional Test, proving beneficial in Oracle ERP contexts.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could improve in handling complex loops and upgrades, web automation, object identification, and integration capabilities. Oracle Application Testing Suite needs enhancement in its limited support for web and non-Oracle applications, installation process, reporting utilities, cross-browser support, and user-friendly dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify deploys across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, but feedback on customer service responsiveness is mixed. Oracle Application Testing Suite primarily supports on-premises and hybrid deployment, with generally more responsive technical support. Both products benefit from community and technical support forums.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify's higher pricing aligns with its rich features, offering substantial ROI through automation, ideal for large enterprises. Oracle Application Testing Suite is priced competitively, often offered at reduced rates for Oracle customers, promoting strong ROI despite Worksoft's higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 5.3%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Venkata Manikanta Somala

Test Engineer at Wipro Limited

Best tool for SAP Environment & Powerfull Automation tool with user friendly interface

From my experience, Worksoft Certify is a good tool for automating SAP, and it also works fine with web apps. But while creating or running scripts, we do face some automation abort issues, which break the flow and need rework. Also, sometimes it feels a bit slow, especially when running more scripts together. If the speed and stability can be improved, that would really help. We are using CTM for scheduling and managing runs it’s useful, but there’s still some scope to improve things like live monitoring and checking results more easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"It's very different versus other tools in the past, which were not very modern. It easy for people to automate."

"A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool."

"I can definitely recommend it to other users."

"The most valuable feature is its time saving. Once development is complete, the short time that it takes to execute a test is invaluable. It saves a number of dollars and man-hours."

"We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort."

"Worksoft developed a tool to support ERP testing. All prebuilt functions are good at steering the application when the test is executed."

"Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success."

"LiveTouch is the best feature of Worksoft Certify; live touching the objects is very beneficial, and we can use the dynamic windows and objects."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"Performance on the web UI part, especially with some of the more comprehensive Fiori features, like the complex tables that are being used, could be improved. In those cases we have noticed a lot of execution-time increase with regards to the Certify solution."

"We have had run ins with some bugs on Business Process Procedure (BPP) and Execution Manager."

"I would like the GUI to be more user-friendly and intuitive. We want to be able to move assets from project to another project without having to be in the same project or the same folder structure."

"We are looking for some enhancements on the Capture 2.0 tool. This would give us the ability to control it directly, like we could with Capture 1.0. Right now, Capture 2.0 doesn't really work for our Business Analysts."

"The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably."

"There was a change to Capture 2.0. In the end, there have been some challenges with the newer version. Therefore, the company testers, the local ones, do not want to use Capture 2.0."

"I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool."

"The primary area for improvement is the support service."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."

"It is costly. It is a bit more expensive than Tricentis Tosca and other tools. If they reduce its price going forward and have partnerships with other vendors, it will grow like anything."

"I think they came out with a different type of licensing specifically for testing. Therefore, you don't have to use a more expensive user license, you can use an automation license. So potentially, if we had 100 use cases, we could spin up a 100 different machines, have them all run and be done in five minutes. That would be the goal, but I don't know if that would actually succeed or not."

"We have seen that the initial Worksoft implementation has helped our customers reduce their testing cycle time by 50 percent. With further continuous improvement, we have seen cycle time reduced up to 75 percent. That is the level of productivity achieved using Worksoft Certify."

"We've saved over 80 percent in time savings."

"The typical range that we see is between 50 to 90 percent improvement in speed capabilities. Another aspect comes with the depth that they're able to test. It increases their capabilities overall to test at a broader level."

"I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Retailer

12%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

Yeah, the setup and license cost is a bit high as per I known but if you’re working mostly on SAP, it’s worth it definitely. You just need to plan based on your project and how much you’ll use it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 28% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 68% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 3% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

August 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

July 2025

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

OATS

No data available

Overview

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Worksoft Certify is the industry's first codeless automated testing system, created for non-technical people to test end-to-end business processes at an enterprise scale.

It was designed to test complicated processes spanning numerous apps and integrating into contemporary DevOps tool chains. Worksoft Certify manages dynamic input, process flows, and frequent variances in business processes with ease.

Worksoft Certify automates the testing of your exact business processes across all of your enterprise applications. This solution makes it simple for customers and suppliers to package a process with all of its related dependencies, sub-processes, record sets, record filters, layouts, and variables.

Worksoft Certify automates tests as effortlessly and quickly as the underlying applications permit, allowing you to evaluate business processes in record time with flawless dependability and consistency. Worksoft Certify speeds up test automation by utilizing a patented Object Action Framework, which effectively models the application under test as a set of pages containing GUI objects and test steps that perform actions on those objects.

Worksoft Certify Features

Worksoft Certify has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

LiveTouch: Without coding, graphically edit and update tests.

No "fail" tests: See fail validations flagged when the end-to-end test continues.

Process comparison: Visually compare tests side by side and eliminate unnecessary tests to reduce maintenance

Magic search: AI-driven process search can find duplicate processes and keep automation libraries clean.

Exploratory testing: Real-time automated exploratory tests.

API testing: Utilize the virtual services and current SoapUI tests.

Test data generator: Obtain data from SAP for testing.

Create content: Make use of the more than 300 prebuilt SAP end-to-end testing scenarios.

Visual capture: Support agile testing by using automation artifacts from process discovery.

Full compatibility: Web, Java, .Net, client/server applications, SAP GUI, FIORI, web portal Workday, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Ariba, SuccessFactors, Hybris, AJAX, and more.

Worksoft Certify Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Worksoft Certify. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Speed: Automate at least 80% of testing to accelerate innovation.

Savings: Reduce overall testing and maintenance expenditures by 60% to 80%.

Confidence: Identify defects faster and reduce production defects by 60%.

DevOps-ready: Run tests as part of continuous integration, testing, or delivery cycle.

Support for RPA: Convert test scripts into robotic process automation.

Reviews from Real Users

Jens N., Enterprise Architect SAP Solutions at a computer software company, writes, “As compared to other tools for test automation, what is very good in this tool is the ability to implement logic into the scripts without coding and learning a complex script language. It is comparable to defining formulas in Excel. It is pretty easy to learn how to make your scripts more intelligent and more flexible as per the situation.”

Aditya C., Sr Test Automation Architect at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features of Worksoft Certify are the way we can maintain the processes and sub-processes inside. We can immediately identify and replicate multiple objects in the application without having a major issue with it.”

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

August 2025

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.