Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat Quay comparison

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Red Hat Quay

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure...

Ranking in Container Registry

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (10th), PaaS Clouds (10th), Marketing Intelligence (1st)

Red Hat Quay

Ranking in Container Registry

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Container Registry category, the mindshare of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is 4.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Quay is 8.2%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Registry Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Quay	8.2%
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)	4.5%
Other	87.3%

Container Registry

Featured Reviews

EmmanuelCatalano

DBA at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Cloud platform has supported cost control and database integration but still needs better metrics and storage

I have not used Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)'s networking solutions today. I studied it somewhat, but it is not my main area currently. We had some problems sometimes with Autonomous Database in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), for example, in the past months related to the asset of the metrics. We found problems related to what we wanted to show to the customer about the database because many metrics were missing. We usually worked together with members of Oracle Italia to ask them to introduce some metrics, for example, those that do not work correctly about CPU usage, memory usage, or network usage. There were some metrics in Oracle Autonomous Database in dedicated infrastructure that did not allow us to show correct information to the customer. We usually needed to ask Oracle Italia to introduce some metrics or clarify metric usage. In some cases, they showed incorrect data in the output, so we had to work with them to solve this problem. I am speaking about problems from approximately one year ago, so I do not know if they have fixed all of it now. One problem I faced in the past with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) was also related to documentation. Sometimes there are differences between Oracle Autonomous Database usage on shared infrastructures compared to dedicated infrastructures. When searching for documentation, it is not clear if one aspect or solution is usable in both technologies or on both shared and dedicated infrastructures. I found some documents proposed for Autonomous Database and then discovered that the case was applicable only for shared infrastructure, not dedicated. Oracle Italia explained to me that Oracle Autonomous Database on shared and dedicated are different products. However, I do not understand why if I have the same version of Oracle in both architectures, I cannot have access to some tools or internal packages in both technologies. We usually had to ask them to introduce also in dedicated infrastructures the use of some Oracle PL/SQL packages, some internal packages, for example, for the management of queues. Another aspect is that the storage of Oracle is not very user-friendly. In Autonomous, for example, where I think an autonomous database should manage storage correctly on its own, my experience is that often we have many allocated storage spaces that are free, but it is impossible to reclaim. We need to expand storage and pay for it, even though it is free. I think that regarding the internal management of storage, Oracle can improve.

Read full review

Marieswaran M

Network Instructor at Advantage Pro

Has allowed me to build and deploy containerized applications consistently by integrating automated image updates and CI/CD workflows

The features of Red Hat Quay that I have found most valuable include the ability to switch between the previous version and the newer version; this is an extra feature currently added, and I appreciate this feature. Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images. It's very convenient, and it automatically stores my images to deploy in the OpenShift application, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting. The positive impacts I have seen from using Red Hat Quay include the ability to change to a newer version and roll back to the older version. This is the only feature I find beneficial, and I can monitor how many people download my images, which I can verify with the analytics provided. The value of geo-replication in maintaining consistent access to container images is significant since I store data in MongoDB and use the Apache Web Server application running in Quay.io, where I store my images.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would say that Oracle Cloud provides support with zero down time and the high probability is very good."

"Oracle is a more powerful database than Azure or AWS."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a cloud-based solution."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting service."

"Clients are able to reduce their costs by using Oracle Cloud."

"In terms of features, upgradeability to the latest version of Oracle suites has been a good feature. All we have to do is just patching or an upgrade, it's pretty easy. Then, it gets regularly updated. That's what I like about it."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Interface."

"The most valuable features of the solution are APEX, Threat Detector, and Cloud Guard."

More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) pros

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building enhances CI/CD pipeline efficiency because all our applications are deployed through CI/CD pipeline, whether Jenkins or Octopus, and can pull images directly through Red Hat Quay using robot accounts and service accounts."

"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."

"Red Hat Quay's automated image building has helped my CI/CD pipeline efficiency by allowing me to store my source code from GitHub and GitLab to my images, making it easier to deploy and run the application without any troubleshooting."

"The best features Red Hat Quay offers for my work are that it is easily integrated with RHEL, so if our environment is RHEL-based and we have already purchased the subscription for RHEL, it is better to use Red Hat Quay because it also improves reliability and integrates easily with all the RHEL-related tools like OpenShift."

"Things like downloading an image, pulling an image, tagging, and pushing it back to the needed organization are fairly easy compared to doing things through the command-line interface."

Cons

"The solution does not follow a retention policy while taking ad hoc backups. Since it does not follow the retention policy, we had to do the manual task to check the backups."

"The solution's technical support services are more expensive than AWS. Also, they should expand the team to address day-to-day issues."

"It isn't easy to get qualified people who know how to work on this tool."

"The main issue for the clients is that they need to understand the credit payments because if it's a currency that's not dollars or euros, Oracle will always convert it into credits and that's not easy for the customer to understand at the beginning."

"In a future release, they could improve by adding some form of machine learning and artificial intelligence."

"Technical support for this solution is average. I contacted them last week and just received a message from them today."

"With the Oracle Cloud Platform, they have to give first some proper documentation with a step-by-step process. Then the customer is able to use it properly. Nowadays, the Oracle Cloud Platform requires lots of floor work."

"There should be more management automation."

More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) cons

"I think Red Hat Quay could improve the security, as users can download the images without a login."

"Nothing is happening regarding AI. I don’t see the role of AI currently."

"It could be more integrated with other platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The subscription is a pay-as-you-go model, with fees that are dependent on usage."

"The product offers a subscription-based licensing model."

"Oracle Cloud Platform has a decent pricing model."

"OCI's pricing is one of its best features."

"Its pricing is complex, but as partners, we can get away with quite a bit of discounting because we deal with them directly. I would rate their pricing probably a one or two out of five because they're quite expensive. Microsoft Azure will probably be the cheapest because depending on the Microsoft product that you have, they have some sort of bundling. There are things that they give you to get you onto Azure. AWS is probably somewhere in the middle."

"Costing depends on if you have an existing license for the application and for the operating system."

"It is cheaper as a solution model. It isn’t cheaper than SAP but offers more features and competition."

"My ROI has increased."

More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud and SAP SuccessFactors?

Differences between Workday, Oracle Cloud,w and SAP SuccessFactors:w Oracle: "simple interface and deep customization to suit the purpose." SAP: Multiple functionalities that increase process effi...

What needs improvement with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry?

What is your primary use case for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry?

In general, I have had a good experience with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), even though my current company uses other cloud providers such as AWS and Azure. With GoldenGate on Oracle Cloud Inf...

What needs improvement with Red Hat Quay?

I am not facing any kind of issue with Red Hat Quay at this time.

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Quay?

In terms of a specific example of how I use Red Hat Quay, we have an environment where we are managing Terraform code stored in GitLab. We run a pipeline and create a renovate pipeline which checks...

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Quay?

If you are considering Red Hat Quay, my advice is that if you have a RHEL environment and you have already purchased the RHEL subscription, then you must use Red Hat Quay because it is easily integ...

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Bedrock vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Compared 6% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Competitors

Harbor vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 39% of the time

Amazon ECR vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 12% of the time

JFrog Container Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Harbor Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 11% of the time

Mirantis Secure Registry vs Red Hat Quay

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Quay Competitors

Product Reports

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)

Download Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) product report

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report

Red Hat Quay

Download Red Hat Quay product report

Also Known As

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Registry, Oracle OCIR, OCIR, Oracle Cloud, Oracle Cloud Platform, Oracle Data Cloud

No data available

Overview

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure offers autonomous database solutions, flexible scalability, and seamless application integration, backed by strong security features. Its competitive pricing and multi-tenancy capabilities provide significant value for enterprises needing comprehensive cloud infrastructure.

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure delivers robust database management, frequent updates, and advanced storage and network services. It boasts global pricing consistency and broad accessibility, making it a preferred choice for hosting databases and migrating on-premises applications. Users in diverse sectors rely on its ease of use, particularly in hosting applications and infrastructure management. However, OCI faces challenges in documentation and integration with third-party services and seeks improvement in automation, support responsiveness, and regional availability.

What are the key features of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure?

Autonomous Database: Self-managing and self-repairing capabilities improving efficiency.
Seamless Integration: Smooth interaction with Oracle databases and applications.
Security Features: Strong measures to protect data integrity.
Scalable Platform: Flexibility to grow according to business needs.
Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solutions for enterprises.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Reliable Performance: Consistent output ensuring enterprise productivity.
Global Pricing Consistency: Predictable costs across regions.
Ease of Use: Simplified processes facilitating user operations.
Frequent Updates: Keeps systems up-to-date with latest advancements.

OCI is utilized by companies in sectors like gaming, finance, and IoT for hosting databases and ERP systems. Its robust infrastructure supports high-performance computing and application development, making it a favorable option for integration and analytics tasks. Enterprises benefit from its capability to migrate on-premises systems to the cloud, enhancing their operational efficiency.

Oracle

Red Hat Quay is a reliable container image registry streamlining image management and integration across platforms, with a user-friendly interface and role-based access control for managing user permissions efficiently.

Red Hat Quay supports container image storage across platforms, including OpenShift. It offers features like automated image building for enhanced CI/CD processes, geo-replication for consistent access, and seamless RHEL integration. While its continuous updates boost performance and reliability, there is room for improved platform integration, AI capabilities, and security measures. Organizations use Quay for enterprise image management, enabling multiple organizations under a single account and facilitating CI/CD pipelines.

What are the most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and management of container images.
Automated Image Building: Enhances CI/CD efficiency with streamlined processes.
Role-Based Access Control: Manages user permissions securely and effectively.
Geo-Replication: Ensures redundancy and access across different regions.
Integration with RHEL: Offers seamless compatibility with existing Red Hat systems.
Storage for Scalable Platforms: Supports platforms like OpenShift for scalable image storage.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficiency in CI/CD: Automated builds improve workflow efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Role-based access control and geo-replication add security layers.
Scalability: Supports growth with integration into scalable platforms.
Cost-Effectiveness: Use with existing Red Hat subscriptions enhances value.
Flexibility: Facilitates enterprise-level image management and multiple organizations per account.

Red Hat Quay is implemented across industries for container image management and application deployment. Organizations leverage its compatibility with OpenShift to manage repositories efficiently, integrate into CI/CD pipelines, and use it for development and training purposes. Quay plays a crucial role in managing Terraform code stored in GitLab, providing a comprehensive repository for diverse containers and applications.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Kenya Airways, Cell, Panasonic, Frontera, M&C Saatchi, Lumentum, WA

The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs. Red Hat Quay