Oracle Content Management vs SharePoint comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Oracle holds a 2.5% mindshare in ECM, compared to Microsoft’s 16.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Oracle Content Management

Read 4 Oracle Content Management reviews

746 Views
392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePoint

Read 160 SharePoint reviews

4,478 Views
3,489 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

SharePoint and Oracle Content Management are enterprise content management platforms. SharePoint often edges out in pricing and support, while Oracle excels in advanced features.

Features: SharePoint integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office, supports document management, and automates workflows. Oracle Content Management offers advanced AI capabilities, broad integration options, and a versatile content management feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePoint ensures straightforward deployment in the Microsoft ecosystem with excellent support. Oracle, though requiring a complex setup, provides powerful deployment options with robust support for intricate implementations.

Pricing and ROI: SharePoint is known for cost-effective setups with high ROI in Microsoft environments. Oracle may have higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI through its rich features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Management Software (10th)

SharePoint

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

160

Ranking in other categories

Web Content Management (1st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (1st), Enterprise Intranet (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePoint is 16.4%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Erick Kathurima

CIO at Clarinox Technologies Kenya

Improves efficiency and offers reliability along with good flexibility

I have used Oracle in different places, especially in the IT industry, for several years since 2009. I have been in the IT industry for a long period of time. I have had a chance to interact with many systems, and I have been in touch with several programming languages, including the ones in Oracle. As a developer, I use Oracle Content Management as an enterprise tool to enable development. The solution's integration capabilities are doing very well because I work with many of them, and its APIs are flexible, good, and secure. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Sanil Paul

IT Service Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined collaboration through seamless integration and customization

I have been an administrator for SharePoint and have used it as an end-user for document storage. Predominantly, I've been involved in administration SharePoint helps a lot since we've moved from using it directly to using it as a backend for Teams, which makes collaboration easier. It supports…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reliability of the system is significant, creating a lot of trust among our customers."

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."

"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."

"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."

"The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features."

"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."

"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."

"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities."

"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."

More SharePoint pros

Cons

"On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments."

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."

"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."

"Improve the user-friendliness."

"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."

"SharePoint is not always intuitive to use and can be overwhelming for non-tech-savvy users."

"The management of the product/back-end is complex."

"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."

"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."

"More hints and make it more user-customizable."

More SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."

"The licensing model for SharePoint Online is based on per user, and it is monthly. The price of the solution overall is good."

"The platform has medium pricing."

"The solution's pricing is relatively expensive because it's bundled with other products."

"The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."

"It comes bundled with the Microsoft 365 pricing plans."

"They are about an eight in comparison to other similar products."

"Any extended support from Microsoft is expensive."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More SharePoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8925

Developer with 51-200 employees

Aug 23, 2013

Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons

At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

On the ITM side, there are conflicts, particularly on the convergence side, where it does not support cluster environments. Multiple instances need to be set up and configured. In the cloud environ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I use Oracle Content Management for multiple projects, applications, and vendors.

See all answers

What do you like most about SharePoint?

The search feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SharePoint?

As SharePoint is part of the Microsoft 365 suite, the pricing is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SharePoint?

The web parts in SharePoint could be more intuitive for end users. Many do not fully understand these features, and improving user awareness could foster better data relations. The learning curve o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 25% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 9% of the time

DocuSign vs SharePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon WorkDocs vs SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

WordPress vs SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

More SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

June 2025

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePoint

June 2025

Download SharePoint product report

Also Known As

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010

Overview

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Oracle

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

June 2025

Free Report: Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.