Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose comparison

Oracle and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1, while Qlik is ranked #45. Oracle holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Oracle GoldenGate

Read 52 Oracle GoldenGate reviews

5,501 Views
3,631 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,513 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Oracle GoldenGate

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Oracle GoldenGate and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration and data replication category. Oracle GoldenGate has the upper hand in replication features, while Qlik Compose excels in ETL and automation.

Features: Oracle GoldenGate is known for its seamless data replication, low training costs, and ability to handle bi-directional replication with a small software footprint. Its capability for real-time replication across various types of databases offers flexibility and stability, particularly in Oracle environments. Qlik Compose is recognized for its ETL and data integration capabilities, straightforward interface, and automation features, efficiently integrating data from diverse sources.

Room for Improvement: Oracle GoldenGate could improve in ease of use, reduce licensing costs, and develop enhanced monitoring tools. It can be complex, often requiring skilled personnel, and lacks support for databases such as Epic's Caché. Qlik Compose requires better monitoring, auto-fix solutions for job failures, handling of complex data transformations, and support for large data volumes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Oracle GoldenGate and Qlik Compose can be deployed on-premises and in various cloud environments. However, Oracle GoldenGate provides more extensive hybrid cloud options, appealing to users with diverse infrastructure needs. In customer service, Oracle GoldenGate support has been inconsistent, with some users noting delays in resolving issues, while Qlik Compose is praised for efficient support despite its complexity requiring regular assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle GoldenGate is an expensive solution with high licensing costs, offering excellent ROI in disaster recovery scenarios and large-scale projects. Its cost is justifiable due to time savings in data integration. Qlik Compose, although expensive, provides a better cost-efficiency ratio if its automation and integration features are fully utilized, especially compared to tools like Tableau.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GoldenGate

Ranking in Data Integration

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle GoldenGate is 1.8%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle GoldenGate	1.8%
Qlik Compose	0.9%
Other	97.3%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

EmmanuelCatalano

DBA at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Real-time data streaming has simplified transformations and kept enterprise databases synchronized

Oracle GoldenGate is good, but I would like to improve it. There is a need for whoever installs and configures Oracle GoldenGate to set the correct parameters for the use cases we need to use. In some cases, we had performance problems related to the streaming because there was a lot of information to stream concurrently. However, you can tune Oracle GoldenGate to use more RAM on the source side or more processes. I think that sometimes what is missing is knowledge about the tool from the person responsible for configuration. At this moment, Oracle GoldenGate is a very good tool, and I do not know in which area we can improve it. Perhaps the debug part of the tool could be improved. In some cases, I use the utility for how Oracle GoldenGate generates messages about the statements that it streams because of bugs, and in some cases, it is not very user-friendly. It may be possible to improve the API or the path related to debugging, but not the tool itself. The tool itself is good. I remember that in some configurations, we had problems with the streaming of DDL, which are changes to Oracle object structures such as tables and procedures. A new feature could be to perform streaming for operational objects such as procedures, functions, packages, or grants. This would synchronize source and target for these aspects, not only for data or the main types of structures, but also for others. I remember that there was some configuration in which you performed the streaming of the entire schema, or if you performed streaming for only tables, then you were unable to stream grants and other Oracle objects. I think it is important to introduce that capability.

Read full review

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It scales well. You can either have it working in with the databases, or you can move it outside. It's got the ability to parallelize up, so you can certainly extract and replay the data from your databases in parallel. So it does have horizontal scalability. That is probably one of its stronger features, the ability just to automatically parallelize the replay and playing of data to allow to scale to large volumes."

"It works best with Oracle."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."

"It is quite scalable."

"CDC is the most valuable feature."

"What I like most about Oracle GoldenGate is that it supports cross-platform migrations. For example, Oracle GoldenGate could pump data from one type of system to another such as the data from Oracle DB to SQL Db2."

"One feature that stands out for me is the data center capability."

"This is a powerful solution provided by one of the most respected companies in the computer industry."

More Oracle GoldenGate pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It can scale."

"It's a stable solution."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"Microservices Architecture is not user-friendly."

"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."

"The product is not easy to use."

"Technical support for Oracle products needs to be more efficient (at least locally in Egypt)."

"The solution's performance needs improvement."

"It's stable but you have to know how to maintain it. That's why it's not 10 out of 10 for me. There are some bugs, there are some issues here and there. All of a sudden your process is not working and you have to figure out why, and sometimes it's not so clear."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."

"Oracle GoldenGate's installation is not user-friendly, we had to read a lot of documentation for the setup and configuration."

More Oracle GoldenGate cons

"There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Oracle GoldenGate should be lowered. It is expensive compared to other solutions."

"It is an expensive product."

"Oracle GoldenGate's license can be expensive compared to other solutions like Qlik Replicate or SAP Replicate."

"Oracle GoldenGate's cost is high."

"The product is expensive."

"The return on investment would make it a worthwhile deal."

"Its price can be better. It is a bit crazy, and its licensing is very difficult to understand. I would rate it one out of five in terms of pricing. There don't seem to be any additional costs."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective for the end users."

More Oracle GoldenGate pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user99375

Database Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 31, 2014

Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard

As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle GoldenGate?

The product is reliable for data integrity.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle GoldenGate?

The pricing of Oracle GoldenGate depends on the discount we receive from Oracle. If the customer orders a larger quantity, we get a more flexible price. The list price is high, and the price can so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle GoldenGate?

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 11% of the time

Fivetran vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 6% of the time

SharePlex vs Oracle GoldenGate

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle GoldenGate Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 20% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Compose

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle GoldenGate

January 2026

Download Oracle GoldenGate product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

January 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

GoldenGate

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Oracle GoldenGate is a real-time data integration and database replication solution. It can detect data events and route them across networks at very low latencies and integrates well with 100s of combinations of non-Oracle databases, data stores, and clouds.

Oracle GoldenGate Features

Oracle GoldenGate has many valuable key features, including:

Simple to use web interface
Fast and easy installation or provisioning
Command line access via AdminClient that can run anywhere
RESTful APIs for DevOps
Offers built-in monitoring but also can be easily adapted to roll your own monitoring
APIs are protected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) authentication.

Oracle GoldenGate Benefits

Some of the benefits of using Oracle GoldenGate include:

Oracle GoldenGate is deeply integrated with the Oracle Database (logging, redo, backup and recovery layer, security, administration, data guard, data vault, autonomous database etc.).
It is the most stable, performant, and reliable CDC / replication solution for Oracle.
High performance: Oracle GoldenGate is capable of sub-second latency for data movement. featuring low impact capture, routing, transformation, and delivery of transactional data.
GoldenGate is the only CDC / replication tool that keeps pace with new and emerging innovations (security, features, data types, etc) in the core Oracle Database.
The solution supports a wide range of use cases, from conventional OLTP data replication and high availability to data lake ingestion or multi-cloud ingestion, SaaS application replication, and messaging replication.
GoldenGate is the only CDC / replication technology certified for Exadata, Exadata Cloud Service, and Exadata Cloud at Customer.
For fault-tolerance, GoldenGate has its own mechanism to keep track of how much work is completed and how much is pending. This mechanism is independent of any database and ensures, with the help of automatic gap-resolution, that no data loss occurs.
GoldenGate uses its own proprietary format files for keeping the committed data coming from the source database, making it independently functional irrespective of the database in use.
To maintain the performance and consistency, only committed data is sent. Uncommitted data is captured by GoldenGate, but is discarded after receiving a Rollback.
With GoldenGate, data sending is in “near real time,” which reduces the possibility of latency.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Oracle GoldenGate users.

PeerSpot user Steve-J., Cloud Migration Software Consultant - UK & EMEA at 1PLACE, says, "What I have found the most valuable about GoldenGate is that it does real-time and no-downtime migrations. Its migrations are fast. There are not many tools like it on the marketplace."

Pinak S., Senior Manager of System and Database at ESL, mentions, “We like how in GoldenGate the heterogeneous database is supported. Sometimes the client actually needs a schedule and needs to ensure the state of databases for reporting purposes. With that in mind, we have been able to configure GoldenGate for certain schema. The solution is quite stable. They've recently improved the ease of implementation.”

A Database Administrator at a manufacturing company explains, "It moves the data as you set it up, and it works. I am also very impressed with its stability and scalability. It is not super feature-rich, but the new releases have more functionality. It recently had more native integrations with Oracle Database. If you are using it against an Oracle database, it has a lot more functionality."

An Oracle ERP DBA Consultant - Oracle Super Cluster T5-8 Admin at a government comments, "GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."

Oracle

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Japan Exchange Group, Daewoo E&C, Herbalife, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Canon, Turk Telekom

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose

January 2026

Free Report: Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.