Original Software Qualify vs Sauce Labs comparison

Original Software Qualify

Read 113 Sauce Labs reviews

9,386 Views
7,978 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Original Software Qualify and Sauce Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: October 2026).

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Original Software Qualify

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (29th)

Sauce Labs

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (18th)

Mindshare comparison

Original Software Qualify and Sauce Labs aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Original Software Qualify is designed for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Sauce Labs, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 4.3% mindshare, down 5.3% since last year.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Original Software Qualify	0.9%
Jira	11.4%
Microsoft Azure DevOps	9.7%
Other	78.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sauce Labs	4.3%
Tricentis Tosca	9.2%
OpenText Functional Testing	8.7%
Other	77.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Konstantinos Tasiopoulos

Group Integration Tools Manager at TITAN

Flexible, multifunctional, and stable testing software with good technical support

I've been using the latest version of Original Software Qualify AQM. Over 100 users in our company use Original Software Qualify AQM. We only have two people in charge of its deployment and maintenance. This software is extensively used in our company. Personally, I recommend Original Software Qualify AQM to other people looking into implementing it. You can do a lot of things with this software. The support is very good. The communication is very good, and they also listen to problems raised. They add new features and functionalities as a response to past problems or issues. It's a very good tool and I recommend it. We've seen a return on investment from this software. I'm rating Original Software Qualify AQM a nine out of ten, because of several reasons: It's very good software, it's a supportive company, and we have very good results from it. This software also minimizes the effort of UATs, and it also allows us to deploy whatever we want.

Read full review

Mohit Rathi

Lead Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Provides multiple test environments and saves time, but should have something for inspecting mobile apps screens

With the desktop browser, we can inspect any screen with the web developer option, but they should provide something for mobiles so that we can quickly inspect elements on the device. To write the Selenium scripts, we require web locators. We have to capture them from the local and execute the script on Sauce Labs. If Sauce Labs can provide a solution where we can inspect any of the mobile devices online, it will be very helpful for us. I also faced an issue where during the execution time, the iCloud password used to expire within a certain period, which used to create pop-ups on the screen making our tests fail. That was one thing that we faced many times. If that can be improved, it will be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can do a lot of things with this software; the support is very good, the communication is very good, they listen to problems raised, add new features and functionalities as a response to past problems or issues, and we have seen a return on investment from this software."

"Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."

"While we are still in the early testing phase, from what I have seen so far, I can say the solution is quite stable."

"So far, the stability has proven to be quite good."

"Customer Service: Excellent, so far. Technical Support: Excellent, so far."

"All features are excellent, especially the parallel runs."

"Supplying devices to a testing team of possibly close to one thousand testers and developers is a great undertaking but Sauce Labs has made this very easy and a welcomed solution."

"My general overall impression of Sauce Labs is very positive."

"The most critical thing is that this software aligns with our Agile and DevOps way of doing things. It integrates with kickoff scripts through DevOps."

"There's no need for other physical devices anymore because everyone's using Sauce Labs."

More Sauce Labs pros

Cons

"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."

"Stability needs improvement."

"The pricing model of Sauce Labs could be more flexible. Sauce Labs has just one price for the type of solution and a set number of devices. Other solutions have a fee for the base solution and an additional cost per device. If you're a smaller organization, you have to consider your needs. Some smaller companies still need to test various devices, so my advice is to start small and scale up as needed. We had initially planned to start big, but that would have been a big waste."

"Not really sure. Maybe a .NET test runner option?"

"Another aspect that could be improved is having the virtual devices boot up a little quicker. Sometimes we wait up to a minute before a device is available. It would be nice if that was 30 seconds or so."

"Customer Service: Three out of five. Technical Support: Three out of five."

"Sometimes pasting text while using "text object" does not seem to work, and it slows down testing times quite a bit."

"There have been various times throughout the last month or so where the service has gone down during business hours."

"It would be very good to see a short example of the code that needs to pass into Driver capabilities, something like auto-generation of this block."

More Sauce Labs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This software is moderately priced."

"They could improve on the pricing because it seems pretty expensive. I'm sure it's justified, but it's expensive."

"Go ahead please. Try it at a smaller scale."

"Try the free trial and work with a Sauce Labs representative to see what package works best for your application(s)."

"Cost-wise, it's decent. If you have to get the base version out of it, it's the best solution to go with. As compared to other cloud service providers, the pricing of Sauce Labs is decent."

"When you reach the Enterprise licensing tier, base level being with 10 concurrent test sessions, pricing is essentially per-unit-of-concurrency thereafter with a relatively linear increase and not much benefit for "bulk"."

"The pricing is reasonable due to the amount of diversity that they provide. However, I feel they might be more flexible to bargain based on their relationship with our organization."

"It is an expensive tool."

"We pay for a specific number of VMs."

More Sauce Labs pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

16%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	73

Comparisons

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 12% of the time

PractiTest vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 10% of the time

RadView WebLOAD vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 8% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Original Software Qualify

Compared 4% of the time

More Original Software Qualify Competitors

BrowserStack vs Sauce Labs

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Sauce Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs Sauce Labs

Compared 6% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Sauce Labs

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Sauce Labs

Compared 4% of the time

More Sauce Labs Competitors

Product Reports

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Download Original Software Qualify product report

Download Sauce Labs product report

Also Known As

Qualify

No data available

Overview

Original Software Qualify is a robust testing solution tailored for businesses seeking efficiency in software quality management. With a focus on comprehensive test management, it streamlines defect tracking and supports collaboration across teams. The platform promotes a seamless testing environment.

Original Software Qualify empowers teams by integrating with various development tools, enhancing collaboration and maintaining consistent quality assurance. It delivers an intuitive approach to test case management and defect resolution. The automation capabilities reduce the time required for testing, enabling teams to focus on critical assessments. Integration compatibility ensures smooth operation within existing frameworks, minimizing disruption during deployment.

What are the key features of Original Software Qualify?

Test Management: Centralizes test cases, enhancing organization and accessibility.
Defect Tracking: Efficiently monitors and resolves defects, improving software reliability.
Automation: Offers automated testing capabilities to expedite processes.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools for streamlined workflow.
Collaboration: Facilitates team collaboration to ensure alignment and uniformity in testing practices.

Why consider user reviews for ROI insights?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual testing hours, optimizing resource allocation.
Quality Improvement: Enhances software quality, lowering long-term maintenance costs.
Speed to Market: Accelerates testing phases, reducing time to release.
Scalability: Supports varying business sizes, accommodating growth.
Risk Mitigation: Identifies potential defects early, reducing post-release issues.

In finance, Original Software Qualify effectively manages complex testing scenarios with a focus on transaction security and compliance. In healthcare, it facilitates rigorous data validation and regulatory adherence, ensuring patient data integrity. These industry applications highlight flexibility and adaptability, fulfilling specific sector requirements.

Original Software

Sauce Labs delivers a versatile platform for enhancing testing accuracy and efficiency. It supports parallel testing and provides access to numerous browser versions without infrastructure worries, making it ideal for comprehensive compatibility checks.

Sauce Labs integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, offering parallel testing, cross-browser and OS testing, and extensive mobile device support. Users can quickly deploy virtual machines and utilize a variety of browsers. Features like video recording, screenshots, and real-time reports facilitate effective debugging. With secure cloud execution and a wide range of real and virtual devices, Sauce Labs significantly enhances development processes. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as speed and connectivity, device availability, documentation quality, and integration with platforms like Azure and GitHub.

What are the core features of Sauce Labs?

Parallel Testing: Run multiple tests concurrently to save time.
Cross-Browser and OS Testing: Test on numerous browser versions and operating systems effortlessly.
Mobile Device Support: Access various mobile platforms for testing.
Integration with CI/CD: Enhance development workflows with seamless integration.
Real and Virtual Device Availability: Use a mix of devices for comprehensive testing.

What benefits should users look for in Sauce Labs?

Infrastructure Efficiency: Avoid the burden of maintaining testing infrastructure.
Debugging Tools: Benefit from video recording and real-time reports for swift issue resolution.
Resource Management: Improve test and resource management through scalability.
Comprehensive Compatibility: Validate applications across a multitude of device and browser configurations.

Sauce Labs is implemented across various industries, particularly where robust testing is crucial. In sectors like finance and healthcare, where application reliability and security are paramount, companies leverage Sauce Labs to ensure their applications function flawlessly across devices. The ability to execute thousands of daily tests and comprehensive integration capabilities makes it a preferred choice for industries focusing on delivering high-quality applications.

Sample Customers

CertainTeed, Marston's, Edrington, Ageas, iPERS.

Salesforce.com, Mozilla, Zendesk, Puppet Labs, Twitter, Bank of America, Eventbrite, Bleacher Report, Okta, Intuit, Travelocity, Sharecare, CapitalOne.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites