Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OutSystems vs Unqork comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
OutSystems typically offers high ROI through fast development and cost savings, though initial expenses and developer skills impact outcomes.
Sentiment score
8.3
Unqork boosts project value with fast, cost-effective development, achieving a 20-30% workload reduction for increased ROI.
Developing that same project in OutSystems can be completed in around 40 to 50% less time, requiring only six resources.
The platform provides default workspaces, and managing or increasing space is easier compared to other platforms.
Using Unqork has resulted in improved cost-saving, time-saving, and resource-saving benefits for our projects.
Two to three projects saw a twenty to thirty percent reduction in workload, indicating a profitable pricing structure.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
OutSystems' service is generally proactive and responsive, but advanced help varies by SLA, location, and contract tier.
Sentiment score
7.3
Unqork's support is reliable and responsive, addressing issues quickly, though response times and prioritization could be improved.
Many helpful videos and documentation are available on the OutSystems site, making it relatively easy to learn the platform.
I rate their technical support as excellent.
The Unqork community helped integrate features like colored status indicators using JavaScript.
Technical support from Zendesk is very reliable and effective.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
OutSystems offers scalable, adaptable solutions for enterprises, with seamless cloud expansion and efficient management, despite pricing concerns.
Sentiment score
7.3
Unqork's scalability is praised for API integration and MongoDB but requires proper configuration for complex projects and traffic management.
They can be deployed vertically and horizontally, supporting as many deployments as needed.
Its cloud infrastructure simplifies global access to data and services without the fear of losing data.
Scalability features like UI and APIs are all available within the same platform, making it easy to handle increased demands.
Not every project can be executed through Unqork as some complex requirements might need proof of concept before proceeding.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
OutSystems is praised for stability and reliability, handling large systems well, with minor issues on high data loads.
Sentiment score
6.5
Unqork is generally stable with minor issues, high user satisfaction, but lacks community support for new users.
A component's previously set value might be missing the next day, affecting reliability.
The main issue I have with Unqork is the limited availability of learning resources.
There have been no significant stability issues where the entire platform went down.
 

Room For Improvement

OutSystems faces performance and integration issues, high licensing costs, and needs improvements in support, automation, UI, and documentation.
Unqork needs enhancements in accessibility, cloud support, analytics, technical debt management, offline functionality, and user interface customization.
It is crucial to be aware of which module corresponds to which application in real-time projects, as there are multiple applications.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
Unqork moved from the Sanctuary to Vega platform without providing a migration tool, necessitating manual updates.
The setup for API calls was initially challenging, especially when dealing with service logs and transforming large JSON codes for validation and PDF generation.
It would be beneficial if they further improved compatibility with both the previous Sencha compiler and the new Vega compiler.
 

Setup Cost

OutSystems is costly, suited for larger enterprises, with yearly fees varying by usage, covering licenses and infrastructure.
Unqork's pricing is premium with per-user, per-month costs, perceived as costly compared to tools like UiPath.
Subsequent users can be added at an additional cost per user; exact pricing details can be found on the OutSystems site.
The certification costs are particularly high, around 16,000 Indian Rupees.
The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath.
In my experience, it seemed somewhat underpriced, possibly due to being an early adopter.
 

Valuable Features

OutSystems streamlines development with low-code tools, offering rapid deployment, easy integration, and enhanced productivity through reusable components.
Unqork offers no-code simplicity, advanced features, rapid deployment, and robust integration to enhance productivity and streamline application development.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
OutSystems has a very good learning curve for developers.
It streamlines operations by automating the process across various departments, allowing cash requests to be raised, reviewed, and approved more efficiently.
Performance-wise, Unqork facilitates connecting and configuring systems synchronously and efficiently.
Unqork allows me to write HTML code, use JavaScript, Angular, and React, which significantly enhances its flexibility.
 

Categories and Ranking

OutSystems
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Low-Code Development Platforms (2nd)
Unqork
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
14th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of OutSystems is 7.9%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Unqork is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

DhrubajyotiBiswas - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us efficiently streamline repetitive tasks, but they could provide improved connectors to integrate with outside platforms
The OutSystems' most effective features for speeding up development cycles are the process orchestration and the drag-and-drop updating of business processes. I would recommend it to a friend or colleague, especially if they are looking for a solution that is easy to deploy and helps streamline internal processes. I rate it a six out of ten.
Rajeev Lochan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support
Given the rapid pace of innovation we’ve already seen from Unqork, there are a few major capability gaps we face currently. However, some areas of improvement and features we would benefit from in upcoming releases include: 1. Enhanced accessibility compliance - While meeting baseline standards, further WCAG conformance and widgets optimized for screen readers could expand access for disabled users of Unqork solutions. Added compliance certifications would also be welcomed. 2. Expanded cloud platform support - The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon. 3. More analytics and observability - Increased telemetry on app performance, component reuse rates, load testing etc. would help fine-tune Unqork solutions. More data and dashboard visibility into adoption would optimize our ROI. 4. Managing technical debt - As portfolios of Unqork apps grow over time, best practices and features to facilitate updating legacy components, refactoring old solutions, and preventing erosion will be helpful. Added controls to manage technical debt long-term. 5. Evolution of existing components - Existing rich widgets and connectors rounding out maturity with incremental capabilities would expand Unqork's versatility. Expanding the range of use cases served by current components. 6. Offline functionality - For mobile solutions, some limited persistent caching and offline usability during intermittent connectivity would better support field agents/inspectors. Tolerating offline states is key. 7. Design version control - Advancing visual version control capabilities for better design history, branching, merging, and reverting changes to Unqork sites would improve collaboration and prevent overwrite errors by nontechnical users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
37%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
What do you like most about Unqork?
Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors.
What needs improvement with Unqork?
I suggest improving the role-based area, particularly the token management. Instead of sending tokens via email, they could be forwarded to a client authentication number. Additionally, handling of...
What is your primary use case for Unqork?
I use Unqork ( /products/unqork-reviews ) as a no-code, low-code tool to create dashboards, create APIs, and build complex applications.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems vs. Unqork and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.