OWASP Zap vs Pentest-Tools.com comparison

OWASP and Pentest-Tools.com are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OWASP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Pentest-Tools.com is ranked #47. OWASP holds a 2.9% mindshare in SAST, compared to Pentest-Tools.com’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OWASP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pentest-Tools.com users who would recommend it.

OWASP Zap

Read 41 OWASP Zap reviews

8,774 Views
8,072 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Pentest-Tools.com

Read 2 Pentest-Tools.com reviews

848 Views
594 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OWASP Zap

Pentest-Tools.com

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OWASP Zap and Pentest-Tools.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OWASP Zap

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Pentest-Tools.com

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

47th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Penetration Testing Services (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of OWASP Zap is 2.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pentest-Tools.com is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OWASP Zap	2.9%
Pentest-Tools.com	0.5%
Other	96.6%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Amit Beniwal

Project Manager at Al Hassan LLC

Simplifies vulnerability discovery and has high quality support

There are areas for improvement with OWASP Zap, particularly in the alignment of vulnerabilities concerning CVSS scores. Sometimes, a vulnerability initially categorized as high severity may be reduced to medium or low over time after security patches are applied. This alignment with the present severity score and CVSS score could be improved.

Read full review

JagdishPrasad

ML Professor at Pune University, Pune

Centralized automation has streamlined vulnerability assessments and improved stakeholder communication

I think that Pentest-Tools.com can be improved in a few ways. As I mentioned before, every software has areas for improvement. Pentest-Tools.com is a strong and mature platform overall, but one area for improvement is deeper customization and workflow automation because while the platform already offers a wide range of scanning capabilities, advanced users would benefit from granular control over the scanning configurations, testing profiles, and automated workflows. Additional options for tailoring assessments to specific environment and organizational requirements could further improve the efficiency and flexibility of the software. Another opportunity lies in expanding the integration with enterprise security ecosystems because many organizations operate complex security environments that include SIEM platforms, ticketing systems, vulnerability management solutions, and DevOps and DevSecOps pipelines. Broader and more seamless integration with these technologies would help organizations to incorporate Pentest-Tools.com more effectively into their existing security operations and continuous monitoring processes. I would also like to see enhancements in historical analysis and trend reporting capabilities. While the current reporting is very useful, additional dashboards that provide long-term visibility into vulnerability trends, remediation progress, and recurring issues and overall security posture improvements would offer valuable strategic insight for management and security leadership teams. Another potential enhancement could be more extensive collaboration features for larger security teams; improving the mechanisms for assigning findings and tracking remediation ownership, managing the review workflow, and facilitating communication among team members could strengthen Pentest-Tools.com's value for enterprise-scale deployment. Overall, these suggestions are intended as enhancements rather than criticisms. Pentest-Tools.com already provides substantial value and performs its core functionality effectively. But the improvements I would like to see include expanded enterprise integration, richer historical analytics, and greater support for modern application architecture along with more advanced automation features that further streamline the security assessment lifecycle. I have tried to cover as much as possible in terms of improvements from my end, and nothing else is coming to mind after that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I consider OWASP Zap to be the most effective solution overall; being open source allows integration with other systems via OWASP Zap APIs."

"The solution is good at reporting the vulnerabilities of the application."

"It has evolved over the years and recently in the last year they have added, HUD (Heads Up Display)."

"Fuzzer and Java APIs help a lot with our custom needs."

"This solution has improved my organization because it has made us feel safer doing frequent deployments for web applications. If we have something really big, we might get some professional company in to help us but if we're releasing small products, we will check it ourselves with Zap. It makes it easier and safer."

"The solution is very easy to use, the initial setup is straightforward, it is free due to the fact that it is open-source, the stability is very good, and the product has a strong community surrounding it to help with issues and troubleshooting."

"It has improved my organization with faster security tests."

"This solution is providing us with value and as long as it continues to do so, we'll continue to use it."

More OWASP Zap pros

"Pentest-Tools.com has positively impacted my organization in two significant ways."

"Pentest-Tools.com has had a very positive impact by improving the efficiency, consistency, and overall effectiveness of our security assessment processes."

Cons

"OWASP Zap could benefit from a noise cancellation feature like that of Burp Suite Professional, where AI helps reduce certain non-critical findings."

"Online documentation can be improved to utilize all features of ZAP and API methods to make use in automation."

"OWASP Zap needs to extend to mobile application testing."

"When comparing OWASP Zap and Burp Suite, the main difference besides pricing is that OWASP Zap has limitations with reporting levels and UI, which affects its reporting capabilities, whereas Burp Suite is already advancing with new AI features and scanning capabilities that OWASP Zap seems to be lacking."

"I'd also like to see an improvement in test reports because we get too many false positives."

"I prefer Burp Suite to SWASP Zap because of the extensive coverage it offers."

"The ability to search the internet for other use cases and to use the solution to make applications more secure should be addressed."

"There's very little documentation that comes with OWASP Zap."

More OWASP Zap cons

"One area for improvement is deeper customization and workflow automation because while the platform already offers a wide range of scanning capabilities, advanced users would benefit from granular control over the scanning configurations, testing profiles, and automated workflows."

"Pentest-Tools.com could improve in a couple of areas. First, the reporting flexibility could be enhanced."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OWASP ZAP is a free tool provided by OWASP’s engineers and experts. There is an option to donate."

"It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool."

"It is open source, and we can scan freely."

"The solution’s pricing is high."

"OWASP Zap is free to use."

"The tool is open source."

"This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing."

"This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."

More OWASP Zap pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OWASP Zap?

OWASP might be cost-effective, however, people prefer to use the free edition available as open source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OWASP Zap?

The improvement that has to be done for APIs focuses on manual activities where the feature exists, but it is not at the same level as what Burp Suite does with intercepting and tools such as Postm...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OWASP Zap

Compared 11% of the time

Acunetix vs OWASP Zap

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs OWASP Zap

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs OWASP Zap

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs OWASP Zap

Compared 3% of the time

More OWASP Zap Competitors

SonarQube vs Pentest-Tools.com

Compared 26% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Pentest-Tools.com

Compared 14% of the time

vPentest vs Pentest-Tools.com

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs Pentest-Tools.com

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Pentest-Tools.com

Compared 7% of the time

More Pentest-Tools.com Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OWASP Zap

June 2026

Download OWASP Zap product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

May 2026

Download Pentest-Tools.com product report

Overview

OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner.

The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

OWASP

Pentest-Tools.com is a comprehensive platform for conducting security assessments and vulnerability testing. With its range of tools and features, users can identify weaknesses in their systems and networks, proactively addressing potential threats.

The platform's valuable features include comprehensive scanning capabilities, a user-friendly interface, and an extensive range of tools.

Users appreciate its ability to identify vulnerabilities, provide detailed reports, and its intuitive navigation. Pentest-Tools.com is highly regarded for its effectiveness in assessing and securing systems.

Pentest-Tools.com

Sample Customers

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Facebook 5. Apple 6. IBM 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. Cisco 10. HP 11. Dell 12. VMware 13. Red Hat 14. SUSE 15. Ubuntu 16. CentOS 17. Fedora 18. Arch Linux 19. Gentoo 20. Slackware 21. Mageia 22. OpenSUSE 23. Manjaro 24. PopOS 25. elementary OS 26. Linux Mint 27. Ubuntu MATE 28. Zorin OS 29. Deepin

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.