No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palantir Foundry vs Seeq comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Foundry
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (5th), Data Migration Appliances (3rd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st)
Seeq
Ranking in Data and Analytics Service Providers
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Data and Analytics Service Providers category, the mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 10.3%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeq is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data and Analytics Service Providers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palantir Foundry10.3%
Seeq1.6%
Other88.1%
Data and Analytics Service Providers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2846265 - PeerSpot reviewer
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Unified healthcare pipelines have improved data trust and accelerated operational decisions
One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve. Foundry has a very broad ecosystem with Ontology, Pipeline Builder, Code Repositories, and AI integrations. For new engineers or business users onboarding, it can take time, especially if they are coming from more traditional data platforms. Better documentation, simplified onboarding paths, and more beginner-friendly examples would help accelerate adoption. Another area is debugging complexity. While lineage and monitoring are strong features, troubleshooting deeply interconnected pipelines can still become difficult in a large enterprise environment. Sometimes error logs and pipeline failure messages could be more descriptive or developer-friendly, especially for distributed PySpark jobs. Another pain point is customization limitations in certain UI-driven components. While low-code tools are great for rapid development, highly customized workflows sometimes still require engineering workarounds or deeper technical implementation. The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
Suradech Kongkiatpaiboon - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Process Engineer at Chevron
Centralized analytics has transformed time series optimization and collaboration across teams
In my opinion, the best feature Seeq offers is the ability to visualize time series data in an efficient way. If we code it by ourselves, it will take a very long time or require a lot of server capacity, and you cannot simply plot a time series of, say, 100,000 records on your own simply because it takes a lot of effort to do that. Analyzing it when we apply any formula or algorithm takes more time to finalize everything. Seeq does this through drag and drop and point and click actions. So, it is much easier to do it by using this tool. Seeq has positively impacted my organization because I see many people using it, compared to the past five years when we had only PI Vision for visualizing time series data. Manipulating time series data was such a critical task that not many people were familiar with and were afraid to do. This task remains a core critical function for everyone to do it efficiently in order to complete anything. Process optimization and reliability analysis would address all failure modes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Palantir Foundry has reduced a very good amount of time to implement a data pipeline and process the data within four hours."
"Live video sessions enhance the available documentation and allow you to ask questions directly."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization mainly by consolidating our data management, so we do not need multiple accounts for different applications and can keep all our data within Palantir Foundry while accessing all applications from there without moving data between locations."
"The AI engine that comes with Palantir Foundry is quite interesting."
"Palantir Foundry gives me a unified view of AI and my engineering space while I have been doing a lot of data engineering in a couple of technologies, bringing that data together and stitching them and putting together AI, enabling AI use cases, which makes me see a holistic view of data coming from various platforms."
"Palantir Foundry has positively impacted my organization with over 200 projects completed efficiently and effectively, and they are very complex projects."
"The security is also excellent. It's highly granular, so the admins have a high degree of control, and there are many levels of security. That worked well. You won't have an EDC unless you put everything onto the platform because it is its own isolated thing."
"Palantir Foundry positively impacts our organization by being seamlessly integrated and offering easy-to-access features without the need for third-party integrations, with everything already in place benefiting developers and subsequently enhancing managers' productivity, leading to overall organizational revenue growth."
"Prior to switching, the same amount of work that takes three to four hours on Seeq would have taken a day or two on PI Vision, representing significant manpower reduction, with one person able to oversee fifty to sixty assets at once, compared to needing four or five people for the same job with other tools."
"AI is great in Seeq. You have a good feature that allows you to convert a Python algorithm built in Seeq Data Lab into a user-friendly interface."
"It is a user-friendly tool, and Seeq is a good application where we can easily access it."
"I love how easy Seeq is to use and how quickly you can build an analysis."
"Seeq has positively impacted my organization, and I can share a specific outcome where we have found a new metric on an important piece of equipment to raise the flag when it is underperforming."
"What I liked most about Seeq was its user-friendly design."
"Seeq has impacted our organization positively because now with Seeq training, we are able to put it out to more people."
"The tool is user-friendly."
 

Cons

"I think much of the work within Palantir Foundry is still manual, so I might want to write certain automations or develop conversational interfaces rapidly."
"Regarding pricing, I heard about it, and until last year, the license was one million dollars. They have now increased this to four million dollars, which is high."
"For example, exporting data from Palantir Foundry is very difficult and has many limitations."
"In my use of Palantir Foundry, many people can go in there and create datasets, save datasets, and share datasets. However, if many people make datasets of low quality or if they are using the same name for datasets, it can get very confusing."
"However, a disadvantage is the challenge of connecting data to and from Palantir, which requires coordination with data engineers."
"There are some limitations when dealing with a large-scale project."
"As a developer, I find the limited documentation and less resource availability restrictive compared to other options such as AWS."
"Regarding documentation, I find that when I face issues, the outdated documentation is not helpful; for example, while trying to create a webhook to fetch SharePoint metadata, I found available resources lacking relevance, needing significant updates to assist users properly."
"Sometimes the software would be a bit slow to respond, and that may be because there were too many users at once."
"As for improvements, I felt there should be a more efficient way to address repetitive customer questions, perhaps using chatbot technology to streamline responses."
"The algorithm features could be better."
"I think Seeq could improve by including a section that has SQL-type visualizations to visualize tables of data and not reference them to the timestamp, as that has caused us some problems at times."
"The ease of working is an issue, as the user interface of Seeq looks a little bit more professional with an industrial look, and it can be made a bit more user-friendly if we compare it to the reliability of other packages like Tableau."
"We face a bit of an issue if there are any server issues or upgrades from Seeq."
"The technical support services need improvement."
"Stability issues happen multiple times because it may be the on-premise tool issue."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive."
"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."
"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"The pricing is average."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data and Analytics Service Providers solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise51
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
The Workshop application could be improved because it is not very customizable, but it is still very strong. We also have the React OSK apps, but it does not allow the inbuilt applications such as ...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
My main use case for Palantir Foundry is to solve business problems, such as in healthcare. I also worked on a project for a law firm where thousands of PDFs were coming in, and we needed to check ...
What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?
I believe they should get started by completing all the free certificates, then they could apply to the paid certificates to get a master of Palantir Foundry, solve some real use cases, do examples...
What needs improvement with Seeq?
I believe Seeq can be improved because report rollouts on similar pieces of equipment can be challenging. If Seeq had an easier way to modify our tag structure, then duplicating reports onto simila...
What is your primary use case for Seeq?
My main use case for Seeq is incident investigations. Upon unexpected quality results, incident investigations can start to determine where the incident first began occurring. Seeq allows the retro...
What advice do you have for others considering Seeq?
My advice to others looking into using Seeq is to pursue it. There are more opportunities with your own equipment than you know without examining them through the lens of Seeq. I would rate this pr...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir Foundry vs. Seeq and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.