Pandora FMS vs Stackify comparison

Pandora FMS and Stackify are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Pandora FMS is ranked #56, while Stackify is ranked #62. Pandora FMS holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Stackify’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pandora FMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

2,146 Views
1,030 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

1,542 Views
678 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Stackify and Pandora FMS compete in the system monitoring and management category. Users generally find Stackify more favorable due to its superior customer support and pricing, whereas Pandora FMS wins for its robust feature set that many users find justifies its cost.

Features: Stackify integrates well with various applications and is easy to use. Its standout features include real-time alerting and vast integration options. Pandora FMS provides extensive network monitoring, detailed reporting tools, and adaptability to diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Stackify users recommend improving application performance insights and scalability options, along with fine-tuning alert configurations. Pandora FMS could benefit from simplifying complex configurations, refining initial setup instructions, and enhancing its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify offers an easy installation process and is well-regarded for its responsive customer service, making it suitable for organizations with limited IT resources. Pandora FMS involves a more complex deployment due to its comprehensive features but supports this with substantial documentation, although response times for customer inquiries could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify is valued for being cost-effective, with quick ROI ideal for small to medium enterprises. Its pricing suits those seeking budget-friendly solutions. Pandora FMS, while more expensive, offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features, appealing to enterprises maximizing extensive capabilities. Users recognize the higher upfront investment for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Pandora FMS vs. Stackify Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS vs. Stackify

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pandora FMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

56th

Ranking in Log Management

62nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (77th), Server Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (45th)

Stackify

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

62nd

Ranking in Log Management

59th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (64th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pandora FMS	0.8%
Stackify	0.6%
Other	98.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Moses Arigbede

Head of DevOps at Partsimony

Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure

They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool."

"The official forum is active enough to answer most of the high-end technical questions that you may have."

More Pandora FMS pros

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The deployment is very fast."

Cons

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"A nice feature in the next release would be an automation module to run workflow actions."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

"Third-party integration should be improved for some commonly used products."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."

More Pandora FMS cons

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"The search feature could be improved."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Media Company

11%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Stackify

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Stackify

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

January 2026

Download Pandora FMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

January 2026

Download Stackify product report

Overview

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS vs. Stackify

February 2026

Free Report: Pandora FMS vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Pandora FMS vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pandora FMS vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.