Panther vs Sentinel comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Panther and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Panther is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Panther holds a 1.0% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panther users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Panther

Read 4 Panther reviews

3,728 Views
2,311 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sentinel

Read 18 Sentinel reviews

9,642 Views
9,160 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Panther

Sentinel

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Panther and Sentinel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Panther vs. Sentinel Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Panther vs. Sentinel

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Panther

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

32nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (27th)

Sentinel

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Panther is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentinel is 2.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sentinel	2.7%
Panther	1.0%
Other	96.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Narendran Nair

Product Security Engineer at Infoblox

AI triage has streamlined real-time alert monitoring and has improved on-call incident response

The best features Panther offers are AI Triage, the ability to comment on our activities, and seamless integration with other communication sources such as PagerDuty, Microsoft Teams, and potentially Slack, showcasing the flexibility we have in using this tool. The most valuable feature for my team is definitely AI Triage, which helps save a lot of time by eliminating the need for manual research regarding patterns that may be repeated, making our work easier and more efficient. Panther has positively impacted my organization as it serves as one of the main sources for triaging real-time incidents. Panther definitely plays a key role in the work that we do. Specific outcomes that show how Panther has helped our organization include saving a lot of time, especially since the AI Triage feature reduces the necessity to reach out to others for clarity, which it occasionally accomplishes on its own. To be honest, it does lack some aspects. For example, if it could access our organizational knowledge, including the Jira database, it might better analyze incidents and determine whether they are false positives or not by using more contextual data.

Read full review

Preetham KumarT.S.B

Senior Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Improved incident monitoring has reduced false positives and supports audit-ready reporting

The best features Sentinel offers, in my experience, include the filtering features and the ability to run KQL queries so that I can understand what table has what and when the last log has been monitored and reported. Sentinel has positively impacted my organization by improving monitoring significantly. As a pay-as-you-go service, we are ingesting logs as needed. When the pay-as-you-go service is enabled, we can either ingest whenever there is a spike in the logs, and when there are fewer logs, we can reduce the ingestion. This approach is helpful for both the organization and me. In terms of metrics showing how Sentinel has helped, as part of log filtering, we have reduced around thirty to thirty-five percent of false-positive incident creation. We have also cleared some audits by enabling log retention in Sentinel, allowing us to pull out data for audits when necessary using both hot retention and cold retention. This has helped the organization as a whole.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Panther positively impacts my organization as it is the first point of response for any incident, giving a reviewer full clarity about what is happening, how it is happening, and where it is happening."

"We have seen a return on investment measured primarily through SOC efficiency and productivity improvements, with teams observing a twenty to thirty-five percent improvement in investigation efficiency depending on the environment and product maturity."

"I find Panther's detection capabilities and integrations to be highly valuable."

"The AI Triage feature saves a considerable amount of time, and if it were to incorporate organizational knowledge, it could provide finer-tuned results."

"The native integration with out-of-the box format is hassle free and allows data to be used advantageously."

"One of the most valuable features is the business intelligence engine. It's very important because it keeps track of everything that's happening and alerts us if something is different than expected. The first time I used it, I was shocked at how well it performed. Another valuable feature that I think makes this product worth the price you pay for it is that it connects to basically every system that provides some form of logging, and it's very easy to set up what triggers this."

"The stability is phenomenal and we never had any issues with downtime or even had to restart."

"It provides real time security event analytics."

"The solution's Kusto Query Language (KQL) execution time is pretty good."

"The solution lets us get all the logs properly and regularly monitor customer infrastructure."

"It makes everything easier by automating some tasks and growing with our needs."

"Sentinel is a tool that, if it's well configured, removes from view all unnecessary information and shows you only needful entries, so you can do your job faster, more conveniently, and with high performance."

More Sentinel pros

Cons

"The solution could be improved by providing more built-in integrations, which would reduce the need for me to build them myself."

"Regarding Panther's accuracy and reliability of output, I would rate it at 70 percent since, at times, it identifies findings as valid when they may actually be false positives, which we have experienced in a few cases."

"The user experience could be improved because whenever I want to investigate the data, too much data is shown in the UI."

"I would prefer to extend dashboards part and their functions in Web GUI version, so the charts could be for configurable."

"Price is always a consideration, so the price would be nice if it were lower."

"There is a need for more flexibility in customization, especially when working with different vendors and platforms."

"I rate Sentinel a six out of ten for scalability."

"The dashboard and customer view should be improved."

"This product's connection to certain types of cloud systems could be improved."

"Documentation for security aspects could be improved. It is difficult to find clear information about encryption or risks that are addressed."

"I would like to see a better reporting work structure on the dashboard."

More Sentinel cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Sentinel's slightly on the expensive side."

"We receive a pricing discount because of our ongoing partnership with Micro Focus."

"The solution’s pricing is aligned with its competitors."

"We inquired about getting support from the vendor, Micro Focus, but the cost was very high."

"Sentinel is moderately priced."

"Sentinel is a subscription-based solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Panther?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing details, as I handle the usage of Panther and not the setup process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panther?

Panther could be improved by adding a feature that allows it to access organizational data, which would help produce better-tuned outputs with fewer false positives and alerts, making our jobs easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panther?

My main use case for Panther is real-time monitoring of alerts, where we triage incidents that occur for our on-call duties. Panther is one of the major sources from which we receive alerts in real...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetIQ Sentinel?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that while it is a little on the higher side, since it is part of a package for all Microsoft products, I feel it is a better choice comp...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetIQ Sentinel?

Sentinel needs minimal improvement, though improvements are ongoing. Everything seems to be functioning perfectly, and I don't have any specific inputs for improvements I would like to see in Senti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetIQ Sentinel?

My main use case for Sentinel is that I'm a subject matter expert for Sentinel, specifically for security incident event and event management. I head the SME for SIEM in LTIMindtree for this curren...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sumo Logic Security vs Panther

Compared 22% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Panther

Compared 19% of the time

Anvilogic vs Panther

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Cloud Platform vs Panther

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Security vs Panther

Compared 2% of the time

More Panther Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Sentinel

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Sentinel

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs Sentinel

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sentinel

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Sentinel

Compared 3% of the time

More Sentinel Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2026

Download Panther product report

Buyer's Guide

Sentinel

August 2026

Download Sentinel product report

Also Known As

No data available

NetIQ Sentinel, Novell SIEM

Overview

Panther is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed for modern security teams, offering real-time detection and prevention capabilities.

Panther delivers robust performance in threat detection, with features that enable organizations to monitor, analyze, and respond to security incidents in real-time. Its integration capabilities with various data sources enhance the detection of threats, providing security teams with enhanced visibility and control over their environments.

What are the key features of Panther?

Real-time detection: Monitors and analyzes data instantly for immediate threat identification.
Scalability: Handles large volumes of data, accommodating growing organizational demands.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing security tools and infrastructure.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances threat detection and response capabilities.
Cost Efficiency: Offers a scalable solution that optimizes resource usage.
Time Savings: Reduces the time taken to detect and respond to threats.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Panther provides tailored security analytics, efficiently handling high volumes of sensitive data. By integrating with industry-specific systems, Panther helps to maintain compliance and protect critical assets.

Panther

Sentinel is a robust platform offering seamless native integration, enhanced security through transactional data, and a user-friendly interface reminiscent of Microsoft Windows. Its capabilities in threat detection, monitoring, and business intelligence integration make it an attractive choice for organizations.

Sentinel simplifies security management with its advanced features, including the Kusto Query Language and automation abilities that reduce the complexity of coding tasks. The platform's correlation engine allows for efficient rule generation, while its threat visibility and intelligence features offer preparation against risks. Advanced hunting queries, anomaly dashboards, and scalability options enhance its utility. Users appreciate its seamless connections with Microsoft tools and ability to improve threat detection through cloud and business intelligence integration. However, enhancements could improve documentation on security aspects, simplify dashboards, and optimize drag-and-drop features. There are suggestions for better device integration, a shift to web interfaces, and improved customization options, although some users face challenges with Unix scripting.

What are the most important features of Sentinel?

Native Integration: Offers seamless connections with Microsoft tools.
Enhanced Security: Utilizes transactional data for better protection.
User-Friendly Interface: Features a GUI similar to Microsoft Windows.
Automation Capabilities: Simplifies coding tasks with Kusto Query Language.
Advanced Threat Visibility: Strengthens risk preparation with intelligence features.

What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Monitoring: Provides proactive threat detection.
Increased Efficiency: Offers automation, reducing manual efforts.
Scalability: Supports growth with adaptable features.
Integration Benefits: Ensures seamless connection with existing systems.

Sentinel finds application across sectors for logging, security event monitoring, and integration with tools like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Users from industries such as government and academic institutions leverage its advanced SQL query support for customized responses, enhancing security measures with AI capabilities in diverse environments.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Docker, Loom, Discord, Dropbox, HubSpot, Asana, GoFundMe, Zapier, Benchling, JupiterOne, Jumio, Bitstamp, Intercom, Randori, and Cedar

Faysal Bank, GaVI, Handelsbanken, ISC Mªnster, Lambeth Council, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, Tukes, University of Dayton, University of the Sunshine Coast

Buyer's Guide

Panther vs. Sentinel

September 2026

Free Report: Panther vs. Sentinel

Find out what your peers are saying about Panther vs. Sentinel and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panther vs. Sentinel report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.