Tricentis Tosca vs pCloudy comparison

Why PeerSpot?

pCloudy and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. pCloudy is ranked #14, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. pCloudy holds a 2.0% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 22.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of pCloudy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

487 Views
487 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

23,309 Views
5,594 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and pCloudy compete in the software testing industry. Tosca appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive testing suite, while pCloudy is noted for its mobile-focused capabilities.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers extensive test automation tools, model-based testing, and comprehensive test case management. Tosca covers a wide range of applications and platforms. pCloudy specializes in mobile application testing, providing cloud-based real device testing, continuous integration, and is suitable for mobile-focused deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: pCloudy features a straightforward deployment process with strong mobile testing support and excellent customer assistance. Tricentis Tosca, though more complex due to its broad capabilities, provides substantial support resources and may require more setup initially.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca involves higher setup costs for its advanced features, potentially offering significant ROI for extensive testing needs. pCloudy, with competitive pricing, delivers good ROI, especially for mobile testing projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of pCloudy is 2.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.8%, down from 32.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	22.8%
pCloudy	2.0%
Other	75.2%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rabindra Maharana

Business Consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

Helps applications to be compatible with other devices

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very good on the UI level."

"The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs and discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that."

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

"We decided to go with Testsuite because you can integrate manual test cases and you can see the reports in a nice way and see how the test case is going in the requirement section."

"Overall, everything is reusable simply via drag and drop, and you will always have a single point of maintenance (e.g. in a future release of your SUT a button was added, you just need adapt the module. Linked test cases and execution lists are updated automatically)."

"The amazing features provided by Tricentis takes automation to a different world and it's fun working with it."

"I'm using Tricentis Tosca as part of test automation, so it reduces the test execution time, and this has improved our organization."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the extremely fast setup, as you can really get up and running within a very small window of time, and we like the fact that it works across mobile, desktop, web, and APIs, giving the solution a broad range of applications."

"It's stable and reliable."

"I liked the "no required scripting" part as most of the people in my team are not skilled QAs and half of the team reside offshore, thus it suited to most of our requirements."

"We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The connectivity is always a challenge. We have to maintain a certain bandwidth at our end to connect the tool and that can be a problem."

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"Product quality has declined as it grows, and its updates aren't without fault. The process of resolving problems has slowed, and as it expands into other areas like NeoLoad and other testing tools, the product becomes more complicated. It used to be a small firm with a clear goal, but as it grows, the quality has been affected."

"I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement."

"Scaling can be tedious."

"In terms of areas for improvement, Tricentis has a variety of tools, even its test management tool called qTest. Tricentis Tosca does have integration with different Tricentis tools, but the integration is geared towards a larger organization perspective. For very small organizations that have minimal licenses, the integration needs to be improvised. For example, I belong to a smaller organization that has only one license, so the capability that the tool provides for integration isn't sufficient because my company needs to have separate workspaces. When Tricentis Tosca is going to be running, it is going to use that license, but my company wants another separate workspace to record, relay, and test. This is what my team has been struggling with, and the mechanism is probably there, but that needs more time and investigation, so I can't say that I'm one hundred percent certain that Tricentis Tosca, in terms of integration for a smaller organization is insufficient. Another area for improvement is that Tricentis Tosca is currently just a Windows-based tool which affects the market because nowadays, Windows isn't the only operating system, for example, there's also Apple or IOS that's moving much faster than Windows."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades."

"Do not buy this tool if you simply need a driver for your automation, as open source solutions (e.g. Selenium), or technology specific solutions are more suitable here."

"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"The pricing and licensing of Tricentis Tosca were alright. Many customers look for end-to-end enterprise solutions, there were not many challenges with the pricing. However, the customers who are coming from Selenium or similar, feel they're paying a premium for this Tricentis Tosca license. If the right person is there for the implementation of the Tricentis Tosca, then it is one of the best tools in the market."

"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs pCloudy

Compared 16% of the time

Perfecto vs pCloudy

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs pCloudy

Compared 15% of the time

HeadSpin vs pCloudy

Compared 14% of the time

More pCloudy Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

September 2026

Download pCloudy product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

August 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

pCloudy offers a comprehensive platform for testing mobile apps. It's designed to enhance app quality through seamless integration and real-time insights, ideal for developers and testers seeking efficient solutions.

pCloudy supports a wide array of mobile devices, facilitating extensive and effective app testing. It provides real-time interaction, allowing testers to observe instant feedback on app performance. By integrating with popular DevOps tools, pCloudy ensures a streamlined workflow, making it a go-to choice for those in need of robust testing capabilities.

What are the key features of pCloudy?

Real Device Testing: Access to multiple real devices for accurate testing.
Automation Support: Integrates with popular automation tools for seamless testing processes.
Comprehensive Reports: Detailed insights and analytics on app performance.
CI/CD Integration: Compatible with popular CI/CD tools for continuous testing.
Remote Access: Test from anywhere at any time using a cloud-based approach.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Efficiency: Reduces testing time with automated processes.
Cost-Effective: Saves resources by providing cloud-based device access.
Quality Assurance: Enhances app quality with detailed error reporting.
Scalability: Accommodates growing testing demands with ease.

In sectors like e-commerce and banking, pCloudy facilitates rapid deployment and rigorous testing, ensuring apps meet industry standards. Teams benefit from the quick setup and comprehensive coverage across a range of devices, critical for maintaining competitive edge.

pCloudy

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

September 2026

Free Report: Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tricentis Tosca vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.