Pico Corvil Analytics vs SCOM comparison

Why PeerSpot?

PICO and Microsoft are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. PICO is ranked #69, while Microsoft is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.7. PICO holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PICO users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

3,606 Views
3,354 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

11,172 Views
7,485 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

SCOM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and Pico Corvil Analytics are competitive products in IT infrastructure management. Pico Corvil Analytics has the upper hand in network performance analytics, while SCOM is more favorable for those in Microsoft's ecosystem.

Features: SCOM offers robust system monitoring, seamless integration with Microsoft environments, and efficient tracking of system health. Pico Corvil Analytics provides network performance analytics, granular insights into data flows, and detailed real-time network analysis.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could enhance its network analytics capabilities, offer more flexible integration options beyond Microsoft products, and improve interface usability. Pico Corvil Analytics might reduce setup complexity, expand system monitoring features, and streamline integration with broader IT management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM benefits from easy deployment within Microsoft settings and is supported by responsive customer service for Microsoft users. Pico Corvil Analytics requires a tailored setup for network specialists but offers comprehensive network support and responsive customer service focused on network issues.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM is often cost-effective for businesses within Microsoft's ecosystem, providing favorable ROI due to integration capabilities. Pico Corvil Analytics may have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI through detailed network insights, valuable for businesses focusing on network performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Pico Corvil Analytics is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.4%
Pico Corvil Analytics	0.6%
Other	98.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"In terms of what it does, I'd give Corvil a ten out of ten; I've never seen a tool like it."

"Corvil is really useful, if you want to produce statistics for your application across different platforms then I would definitely recommend it."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"My advice is "Go for it." It's an amazing product."

"Broadly speaking, this solution has reduced incident diagnosis times because it is a tool that we don't have elsewhere."

"As part of my role in monitoring multiple client connections, I would use Pico Corvil Analytics to set up alerts for performance issues, such as TCP resends and dropped packets. These alerts would trigger when the volume was low and performance was poor, allowing me to work with our trading partners to find a resolution. I would present them with the statistics I had and together, we would identify the source of the issue. This collaboration resulted in the client often reconfiguring their systems. For example, we may find that a network connection needed to be made. Overall, this proactive approach helped to maintain strong connections with our clients and minimize disruptions to trading revenue."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."

"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."

"SCOM is a required tool in my job since I am responsible in overseeing multiple virtual and physical servers and services for a bank."

"We like the deployment of the machines and the features that they have, and it's easy to use."

"SCOM has helped us to monitor all the VMs in our environment, especially the Windows servers."

"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing. The discovery works in an automatic way, and it has a dynamic way of discovering the components, assets, and applications. It doesn't require any manual intervention."

"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."

"The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage."

More SCOM pros

Cons

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting... The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky and I find that, whereas on the GUI you can pull out all the metrics you want and it's very flexible and nice and easy to customize, the reporting is not very intuitive."

"It is perceived as an expensive option, even in the financial services sector."

"Sometimes, when you are saving any configuration and making changes, there are times something is missing. An error comes up, or sometimes there is no error, and the errors are not very straightforward as to the issue."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

"Application monitoring must be improved."

"I would like to see them improve their network monitoring."

"Both SCOM and WhatsUp Gold could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."

"We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting."

"It's not straightforward, SCOM is relatively noisy out of the box, so time is required to tailor the alerting, adjusting threshold triggers and over-riding alerts that are not required to ensure alerts captured are relevant and require action."

"SCOM server needs periodic maintenance to make sure the disk/database has enough space and a lot of alerts across a big environment might come fairly quickly."

"In terms of features that could be improved, I would say the agent integration into the operating system. We are having difficulties integrating Linux into some of the networking devices."

"The configuration, especially for alerts, are somewhat lengthy."

More SCOM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."

"It is the cheapest product available in the market."

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

"SCOM is very cheap because it's included in the license for the System Center suite, which is around $8,400 per CAL."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

"I don't know the exact cost because it's managed by our sales team, but Microsoft is on the higher side."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

cPacket cClear vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Great Bay vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 6% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2026

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

August 2026

Download SCOM product report

Also Known As

Corvil

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Overview

Pico Corvil Analytics offers advanced capabilities in latency measurement, data analysis, and real-time packet decoding. Its intuitive dashboards and comprehensive analytics support latency management and customizable metrics, enhancing performance monitoring and infrastructure optimization.

Designed to assist in latency monitoring and benchmarking, Pico Corvil Analytics is essential for tracking server and exchange latency, client connectivity, electronic trading environments, and order flows. It provides features like real-time analytics, custom dashboards, and anomaly detection, aiding in transaction scrutiny and market activity predictions. Users note the depth of analytics features, although there is a desire for iHub functionality within the app, simpler configurations, and more intuitive performance analytics and reporting.

What are the core features of Pico Corvil Analytics?

Latency Measurement: Precision tracking for server and exchange latency.
Data Analysis: Granular insights for enhanced trading efficiency.
Real-Time Packet Decoding: Immediate packet analysis for troubleshooting.
Visualization: Advanced dashboards enhancing data communication.
Intelligent Alerts: Proactive performance monitoring and collaborations.

What benefits can users expect from Pico Corvil Analytics?

Enhanced Trading Efficiency: Drives strategic upgrades and operational improvements.
Nuanced Network Analysis: Empowers detailed troubleshooting and network management.
Performance Monitoring: Aids infrastructure optimization through informed decisions.

Pico Corvil Analytics is widely implemented in industries requiring high-performance trading infrastructures, such as financial services and electronic trading environments. It supports users in predicting market activities and ensuring reliable, efficient trade execution. Custom dashboards and real-time analysis provide a competitive edge in these high-stakes arenas.

PICO

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Dialog Telekom

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM

September 2026

Free Report: Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM

Find out what your peers are saying about Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pico Corvil Analytics vs. SCOM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.