PTC Integrity vs Rally Software comparison

PTC and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Broadcom is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.8. PTC holds a 4.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to Broadcom’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 68% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

1,975 Views
1,555 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Rally Software

Read 119 Rally Software reviews

6,073 Views
2,704 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Rally Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and Rally Software are competing in the project management and application lifecycle management domain. Rally Software has a stronger position in feature coverage and integration capabilities, while PTC Integrity is preferred for its structured change management processes.

Features: PTC Integrity offers change management, version control, and support for compliance and traceability. Rally Software focuses on agile project management with backlog management, sprint planning, and collaboration tools.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could enhance user experience, integration with third-party tools, and streamline deployment processes. Rally Software could improve its traceability features, expand compliance support, and reduce complexity in portfolio management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity involves complex setup and provides comprehensive support tailored to specific industry needs. Rally Software offers easier deployment with a cloud-based model and customer service aligned with agile methodologies.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity has higher initial setup costs but delivers substantial ROI in regulated industries. Rally Software's subscription-based pricing allows for faster ROI through quick deployment and agile transformation.

To learn more, read our detailed PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rally Software

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

119

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rally Software is 6.8%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Deep Maini

Agile CSM - Sr. Scrum Master at Alliant Energy Corporation

Helps you collaborate on various effects and solutions from the top to the bottom of the organization

We use Rally Software extensively in our agile development processes. We have program boards set up where we write and break down stories. We assign story points and map dependencies between different stories, showing how stories from one team may depend on stories from another team. It integrates these functions well, especially compared to Jira, which has some limitations in this area. The tool keeps improving based on how teams actually work in Scaled Agile, continually upgrading their software versions to meet our needs. I find the whole Rally Software tool integrated very nicely. In Jira, we often go to Confluence for documentation using two separate tools. But in the product, it's not like that. The documentation is tightly integrated. I don't feel like switching to another tool, like going from Jira to Confluence. The tool is designed for collaboration. It shows your organization's view, showing different teams and verticals. It helps you collaborate on various effects and solutions from the top to the bottom of the organization. It has an ecosystem that supports this. All the dependencies between different teams can be easily mapped in Rally Software. They have a program board for that purpose.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

More PTC Integrity pros

"It's very user-friendly."

"Tech support is very responsive, helpful, and available."

"It documents stories in a way where we do not have to be heavy on front-end requirements, front-end documentation, and front-end workflows."

"It's good only for documenting manual test cases."

"When we went into Scaled Agile Framework, we could not have done it without the use of Agile Central. It allows us to scale our Scrum teams, and it also enables us when we do our remote big room plannings."

"The visibility it brings to the plan, the ability to capture tasks, and trace them all the way through the life cycle. Providing that visibility helps both me and the team, or teams, to be able to understand where we are in the development process."

"If teams are tracking correctly and entering their information correctly, it's really easy to see where you're at, within your release, and whether you're on track or not."

"What I like most about Rally Software, in terms of using it for the agile process, is that it's clear, useful, and user-friendly. I also like that it has every field you can use for the Scrum process."

More Rally Software pros

Cons

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

More PTC Integrity cons

"The product itself seems to have a lot of bugs. One issue is that it sometimes allows people to modify data inappropriately. For example, team members can change numbers at will. While we have a mechanism to track changes, people can still alter numbers, create or delete tasks, and create or delete high-level activities without proper controls."

"What I don't like about it is that it is really hard to find old work to reference information and use the reporting section of the application in terms of trying to analyze trends. If I am trying to find out which interfaces took this long and I want to compare and measure improvement from one quarter to another quarter, the reporting mechanism within Rally is very troublesome. They have an Excel plugin that you're supposed to use, but you literally have to pull the raw data out before you can do the analysis. You can't do it within Rally, and if you can, it is a secret, and I don't know how to do it. It should have better, easier, and user-friendly reporting without having to use the Excel add-in. It is very clunky. There is a lot of data in there, but it is not organized in such a way that makes it intuitive. You really have to kind of look for where do you put your documentation or dates. Some customization is available, but it is not plug-and-play like Jira. When I switched from TFS to Jira, I just went and started using Jira, whereas with Rally, you kind of have to really get in and figure out what you need to do before you set stuff up, or you're going to get yourself stuck. You can just start using Jira and be successful."

"It's a bit cumbersome to manage the Project Picker. As we sunset teams or projects close out - but we still have test cases tied to those teams or projects that are being used in other spaces - we have this monstrous list in the Project Picker that becomes really difficult to manage and find, and we can't clean that up ourselves. It would be nice if it was easier to do that and not lose your history."

"More importantly, we are seeing internal challenges from Atlassian because of their highly integrated suite that enables further automation and centralization of activities that are also highly necessary – messaging notifications cued off builds, collaboration on Solution Architecture Documentation, etc."

"In Rally Software, the connection with GitLab and GitHub needs improvement."

"CA Agile Central does not have a workflow tool included."

"The Reporting feature can improve, especially around executive summaries and dependency mapping."

"I think there is a missing link with the development activity. Some developers are pushing in new versions of the code, but you cannot make the link from the user story to a specific application version."

More Rally Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"We are always looking for a discount, if the solution was less expensive it would be a benefit."

"The license costs are fairly high as compared to some of the other solutions out there."

"I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything comes with a price. I think it's an expensive solution compared to Jira or other competitors, but it's a complete package."

"Rally Software costs $50 a month, and for a base account, that price is acceptable."

"Frankly, pricing is expensive and needs to be carefully planned for when budgeting."

"I understand it's a little more expensive. That is why many people prefer Jira."

"From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs."

"It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

71%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rally Software?

Rally offers many features that help the management of activities, coordination, alignment and reports, which applies agility across the organization. If I were to highlight a particular feature, i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rally Software?

I don't know the exact pricing, but I think the tool is priced high. They provide quality workmanship, good software, regular upgrades, and they're always attentive and listen to users. Everything ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rally Software?

The product itself seems to have a lot of bugs. One issue is that it sometimes allows people to modify data inappropriately. For example, team members can change numbers at will. While we have a me...

See all answers

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 59% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

Jama Connect vs PTC Integrity

Compared 3% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Rally Software

Compared 35% of the time

Jira vs Rally Software

Compared 33% of the time

TFS vs Rally Software

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Rally Software

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Rally Software

Compared 2% of the time

More Rally Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

May 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Buyer's Guide

Rally Software

May 2025

Download Rally Software product report

Also Known As

MKS

CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM

Overview

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

TRW Automotive

Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software

April 2025

Free Report: PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software

Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.