No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.6%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.6%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.9%
Other91.5%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
PrashantGupta3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Intelligent Automation at 360 One
Automation in banking has reduced manual analysis and has provided consistent high ROI
UiPath Process Mining has provided us with FTE resource reductions, and we have achieved a health summary of this automation with around a 98-99% success rate, which helps us generate ROI on a month-to-month basis. I was part of the initial setup process for everything on the infrastructure side. The initial setup was quite easy with ease of installation because we had direct support from UiPath community, and the infrastructure team was also involved, making it an overall smooth journey for us. I have not communicated much with technical support over the years because UiPath has its community, which resolves most of our queries. On the rare occasions when we have contacted technical support, I found them to be really good, possessing excellent technical expertise, and every issue we raised was resolved 100%. I find UiPath Process Mining to be scalable, which is why we deployed it on AWS cloud, as we do not have to focus on scaling or increasing our automation use cases since we have set it up for auto-scaling. In terms of stability and reliability, I find UiPath Process Mining to be quite stable, and I would rate it around nine out of ten for the application's performance. Overall, I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"The solution has a very good data analysis feature."
"ProcessGold has given my organization extensive visibility and understanding of business operations."
"When it comes to valuable features, I think the first one will be the way we can visualize the whole process."
"Once we implemented RPA, it reduced the time factor by around 80%."
"The most valuable feature is the user interface, which makes it easy to use for tasks like configuring resources."
"The visualization part, showing the number of cases processed successfully after a process is executed, is the most valuable. It also showed how effective a bot is after production. This kind of analysis that we got from UiPath Process Mining was good."
"This technology as a whole is really revolutionizing our finances."
"With UiPath in place, we are moving away from training people on the core applications, which are pretty complex. We've built a headless frontend, so it's really easy for anybody to join our company and be productive."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Its price can be improved. They can also have a better plan for training the end users to be able to use this solution."
"I think they need to work more on producing low code to make it more end-user-friendly."
"UiPath doesn't clearly define the pricing models, which makes it very hard for customers."
"The technical support for UiPath Process Mining needs some improvement."
"The product could be better integrated with simulations."
"UiPath Process Mining is associated with a high cost and a difficult learning curve for those unfamiliar with process mining tools."
"UiPath Process Mining has a cloud-based version and doesn't have a desktop version like Celonis."
"What needs improvement in UiPath Process Mining is manual delay support. For example, I have a pending workflow, and I've not taken action in the last five or ten days, and because of this, the whole process gets delayed, but UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide any manual delay insights. It gives about seventy to seventy-five percent detail on end-to-end process delays, the scope of automation, or the gap, but not about the manual delay, so what would make the solution better is if it communicates manual delay information. Every business process relies on human activity, with either approval or review, so UiPath Process Mining should capture that area and provide a workflow or diagram that shows more details, such as the impact of the delay, the workflow time without the human delay, etc. That could be too difficult, but it's what I'm expecting as a customer. More automation in UiPath Process Mining would be great."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"The price of UiPath Process Mining could improve."
"The pricing of Process Mining is based on an annual subscription. The final cost per year depends on what clients are able to negotiate with their salesperson."
"The cost of UiPath Process Mining is costly but there are no additional costs in addition to the licensing fee."
"I found the pricing for UiPath Process Mining expensive when you compare it against the pricing for Power Automate."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining has different licensing types for users, developers, end-users, or designers. I don't have the figures, price-wise, but because my company is a UiPath partner, there's some discount offered when you buy in bulk. UiPath provides a good deal if you're a bulk user. UiPath Process Mining gives you value for money compared to some of its competitors in the market."
"It is extremely expensive."
"UiPath Process Mining is a bit overpriced for someone considering the solution without knowing for sure whether it will help them."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In terms of improvement, I do not think much could be enhanced because it gives us good output. However, in terms of optimization, we can consider further enhancements. There are a few use cases wh...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
Our major use case related to banking and BFSI domains is to start with business automation. We conduct process mining to determine the ROI and other benefits from this automation. UiPath Process M...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.