No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.3%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.5%
Other92.2%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
GS
Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
End-to-end visibility and transparency help remove bottlenecks
UiPath Process Mining impacts our company positively by providing us with a lot of insights. It helps us optimize our shared services operations. We can see where the process bottlenecks are and address them. It's useful for optimization and reducing bottlenecks across the business processes. UiPath Process Mining helps to free up staff's time for other projects. UiPath Process Mining helps save 10% to 12% of our time. UiPath Process Mining helps us reduce our total cost of ownership (TCO). It helps us reduce our TCO by approximately 5%. It has potential, but we are not using it fully. UiPath Process Mining takes two to three months to implement and another two to three months to adopt. We could see its value within four to six months. UiPath Process Mining comes with quite a few connectors and tools, so its integration capability is decent. UiPath Process Mining provides excellent end-to-end visibility as long as you have the right data source systems and quality. Many times, we struggle with data quality, but if you have good quality data, it provides you with good end-to-end results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"The most valuable feature is the user interface, which makes it easy to use for tasks like configuring resources."
"We find the solution is scalable."
"What I like about this solution is the way it identifies the process and the transformation from data to some analysis between appliances."
"Their support is really good, and it is a stable product."
"I am 100% satisfied with the UiPath technical support."
"It proves beneficial for comparing our initial documentation, outlining steps like purchase requisitions, approvals, and process diagrams, with the actual occurrences in the SAP system."
"Great user interface."
"The most valuable features of UiPath Process Mining are the ease of use, it's provided us with good indicators of which processes can be automated. There are lots of non-value-add activities which are being done that have helped us identify. If we apply lead principles we are receiving a lot of benefits without automating. You are actually getting a lot of benefits even without automating."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"It's quite an expensive solution."
"If UiPath can identify where it has gone wrong and try to identify the bottleneck value, which are more machine learning in AI, it would be great."
"The cost should be improved with variable models to help different types of users afford the product."
"UiPath Process Mining has become more stable in its latest release, but in terms of ability or what it can do, there's still a lot of room for improvement."
"In an upcoming release, they could improve on the customization."
"The main thing that can be improved is the price, nobody wants to pay that much money for a scheduler."
"While it is fairly stable, this is something that could be improved."
"Adoption is the key. The solution can give great results, but many times, we struggle to drive adoption."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining pricing is comparable to other tools in the market."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"It is extremely expensive."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The product is affordable. It depends on if you are looking for some capabilities from time to time."
"It is very expensive."
"It is not an expensive product, although the price could be lower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
The use cases for UiPath Process Mining vary, but it is recommended where companies have a level of maturity in understanding their processes, yet haven't fully mapped them and utilized data. We us...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.