Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.2%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.2%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.2%
Other92.6%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
GS
Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
End-to-end visibility and transparency help remove bottlenecks
UiPath Process Mining impacts our company positively by providing us with a lot of insights. It helps us optimize our shared services operations. We can see where the process bottlenecks are and address them. It's useful for optimization and reducing bottlenecks across the business processes. UiPath Process Mining helps to free up staff's time for other projects. UiPath Process Mining helps save 10% to 12% of our time. UiPath Process Mining helps us reduce our total cost of ownership (TCO). It helps us reduce our TCO by approximately 5%. It has potential, but we are not using it fully. UiPath Process Mining takes two to three months to implement and another two to three months to adopt. We could see its value within four to six months. UiPath Process Mining comes with quite a few connectors and tools, so its integration capability is decent. UiPath Process Mining provides excellent end-to-end visibility as long as you have the right data source systems and quality. Many times, we struggle with data quality, but if you have good quality data, it provides you with good end-to-end results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"It's an extensive solution."
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Process Mining is the comparison feature."
"Their support is really good, and it is a stable product."
"UiPath Process Mining's conformance feature allows us to upload our standard processes and compare how well our actual processes deviate from them."
"The features of UiPath that I find most valuable was working with Abbyy scanning."
"The most valuable feature is that it improves our processes and it deploys automation at a cheaper price, higher efficiency, and accuracy."
"We can connect Microsoft with the bot and share documents."
"I have found the most valuable features to be virtualization, multi-user, developer tools, API analytics, and workflow management."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"The cost should be improved with variable models to help different types of users afford the product."
"UiPath could improve on how it works with the project management process and flow."
"The ability to transform raw data into actionable information can be challenging due to the variability in our customers' processes."
"The product could be better integrated with simulations."
"We faced issues with the data sharding process. UiPath has its own limitations in terms of the number of rules of data it can actually handle at a given point of time."
"The number of file formats that can be uploaded should be increased."
"Adoption is the key. The solution can give great results, but many times, we struggle to drive adoption."
"Adoption is the key. The solution can give great results, but many times, we struggle to drive adoption."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"We are using the Community Version of UiPath and have only a single process automated."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"It's reasonable. It provides you with all the basic features that somebody would expect."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"The pricing of Process Mining is based on an annual subscription. The final cost per year depends on what clients are able to negotiate with their salesperson."
"UiPath Process Mining is not very expensive, and that is where it beats Celonis."
"UiPath's licensing is based on how many documents we process using this solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Process Mining?
I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.