Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.2%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.2%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.2%
Other92.6%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
GS
Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
End-to-end visibility and transparency help remove bottlenecks
UiPath Process Mining impacts our company positively by providing us with a lot of insights. It helps us optimize our shared services operations. We can see where the process bottlenecks are and address them. It's useful for optimization and reducing bottlenecks across the business processes. UiPath Process Mining helps to free up staff's time for other projects. UiPath Process Mining helps save 10% to 12% of our time. UiPath Process Mining helps us reduce our total cost of ownership (TCO). It helps us reduce our TCO by approximately 5%. It has potential, but we are not using it fully. UiPath Process Mining takes two to three months to implement and another two to three months to adopt. We could see its value within four to six months. UiPath Process Mining comes with quite a few connectors and tools, so its integration capability is decent. UiPath Process Mining provides excellent end-to-end visibility as long as you have the right data source systems and quality. Many times, we struggle with data quality, but if you have good quality data, it provides you with good end-to-end results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"I have found the most valuable features to be virtualization, multi-user, developer tools, API analytics, and workflow management."
"We find the solution to be really easy not just for development purposes, but also for its use and ability to be understood."
"We haven't automated processes based on UiPath Process Mining, but we've used it to gain insight into our processes. It also helps us refine and speed up our standard operating procedures."
"With UiPath in place, we are moving away from training people on the core applications, which are pretty complex. We've built a headless frontend, so it's really easy for anybody to join our company and be productive."
"The most valuable feature is the AI center for document understanding."
"This technology as a whole is really revolutionizing our finances."
"It provides the visualization, the PI data, and all other information."
"The personal learning tools are good."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"If UiPath can identify where it has gone wrong and try to identify the bottleneck value, which are more machine learning in AI, it would be great."
"The connection to other systems could be better."
"We faced issues with the data sharding process. UiPath has its own limitations in terms of the number of rules of data it can actually handle at a given point of time."
"Process Mining still has to mature somewhat."
"The solution's UI and UX could be made better."
"The installation documentation and guides for users from UiPath Process Mining could be a little better."
"It would be beneficial to improve the cost since it is quite expensive."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Process Mining is that its pricing is too expensive, particularly when compared to Power Automate."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"The licenses are flexible, they start once they are activated. The license is purchased annually. The cost of the solution is very good compared to other similar solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining is better priced than Celonis, which we found to be on the costlier side."
"We pay yearly, and I believe a support fee is paid monthly."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"The price of the solution could be lower. However, Automation Anywhere is approximately $8,000, and when comparing these solutions, UiPath Process Mining is less expensive. The license for the solution is purchased annually."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"UiPath Process Mining pricing is comparable to other tools in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Process Mining?
I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.