Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Signavio Process Intell...
Ranking in Process Mining
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is 7.4%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence7.4%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.2%
Other90.4%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
PD
Manager at Adidas
Process visualization and collaboration enhance decision-making but improvements in licensing and support are needed
It is effective in real-time, although there are a few shortcomings. For example, in SAP Signavio, if you have two or three systems through which your process is flowing and it creates a multi-event log, that is where SAP Signavio has its shortcoming as it doesn't support multi-event logs. The seamless connection with various data sources impacts the ability to generate accurate and actionable insights, especially if it is SAP as your source system, making it pretty easy. However, if it goes beyond SAP, that is when it becomes difficult and ineffective with respect to cost. For example, we recently did an analysis in which we were almost going to pay 10 times the cost of a normal process mining tool if we used SAP Signavio. What they are doing is counting the number of records and processes dealt with, which may not accurately reflect your data. This issue particularly arises when your data is lean, as the number of records can become inflated, leading to expensive charges that are not recommended for non-SAP tools, especially for real-time data streams. The license structure of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence should be improved for the next release. For example, charging by the number of records becomes inefficient, particularly for systems where comments may be numerous and irrelevant to the actual usage of the data.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency."
"Everything is valuable. If you're looking at the process documentation feature, it's really easy to use. We have official training from Signavio trainers, but sometimes I do the training myself very shortly for our colleagues. In less than one or two hours, they are already able to model the business process themselves. The language is really easy. The user interface is really easy. If you're talking about process simulation, we have customers and clients internally who are using it a lot, because they are from logistics or operations. They have numbers and KPIs behind the process. They know their numbers, so they have to see how they can improve a given business processes with a change in the task sequence or a change in the numbers of KPIs. If you're talking about the process mining, it is integrated into the whole solution."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"The initial setup was simple. One can know how exactly the process performs just by clicking a few buttons."
"The product's best feature is the connection and integration between all of the capabilities."
"The interconnectedness of the SAP Signavio Process Intelligence module with the other modules is very nice, and it provides insights into them as well."
"It's easy to set up."
"The product is relatively user friendly, it does what you need it to do."
 

Cons

"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The challenge for a solution that utilizes modeling notations, is that the look and feel of the models (e.g. in BPMN) is pre-defined."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
"The product doesn't allow me to focus on a particular value stream and how the value stream performs."
"Interface could be more user friendly."
"I personally found that when we were doing the proof of value, the Process Intelligence modules' AI is not as mature as other Process Mining tools in the competition."
"The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use."
"What I would improve in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is the speed at which we can connect different data sources to it, and also understanding more around when a record is truly a record, because it can use up capacity very quickly."
"When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"The costs of the solution require transparency since sometimes it refers to the number of users and sometimes the amount of volume that is used"
"I would not say the product was terribly expensive but I would not say it was cheap either."
"It is a fairly expensive solution."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The pricing is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
16%
University
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The pricing of SAP Signavio could always be better. There are always discounts to be had.
What needs improvement with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
What I would improve in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is the speed at which we can connect different data sources to it, and also understanding more around when a record is truly a record, beca...
What is your primary use case for SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
We have various different use cases at the moment. The reason we use SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is because it cuts down on workshop time for capturing process and assists us with process sim...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
NBN, T-System, Transurban, Audi BKK, Taifun, Met Office, Esquel Group, Sivantos, Consensus, Sirona
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.