Celonis vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer comparison

Celonis and QPR Software are both solutions in the Process Mining category. Celonis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while QPR Software is ranked #12. Celonis holds a 15.8% mindshare in PM, compared to QPR Software’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Celonis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Celonis

Read 60 Celonis reviews

6,788 Views
3,055 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Read 2 QPR ProcessAnalyzer reviews

408 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Celonis

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Celonis and QPR ProcessAnalyzer are competitors in the process mining solutions category. QPR ProcessAnalyzer has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite competitive pricing and support from Celonis.

Features: Celonis focuses on advanced data integration, powerful analytics, and process optimization. QPR ProcessAnalyzer offers strong visual analytics, customizability, and in-depth process discovery.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Celonis provides a straightforward deployment process with training and support resources. QPR ProcessAnalyzer features a flexible deployment model and efficient customer service, adaptable to various operational environments.

Pricing and ROI: Celonis has a more cost-effective initial setup with scalable pricing. QPR ProcessAnalyzer requires a higher initial cost but offers substantial ROI with its feature suite and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celonis

Ranking in Process Mining

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (5th)

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Ranking in Process Mining

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 15.8%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Mining Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Celonis	15.8%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer	2.2%
Other	82.0%

Process Mining

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining

Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.

Read full review

reviewer1282173

Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple

We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Action Flows are good."

"The documentation, multi-hop analysis, and SLA breaches are the most valuable features we have discovered."

"It provides a visualization of the process itself, giving a very good synthesis of performance and helping me find improvements."

"Celonis is a good idea to change the way processes are considered in a company."

"After implementing this Action Flow, our normal ServiceNow ticketing has been reduced by 70 percent, and vendors are utilizing the Action Flow extensively."

"My two favorite features are execution management and process intelligence, which provide 360-degree data."

"Celonis is intuitive, powerful, and user-friendly."

"Technical support is really good. For me, the sales support matters more. When I'm in a sales cycle, the Celonis sales teams are very helpful. They reach out to me from day zero."

More Celonis pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."

Cons

"It should be more flexible. It is not particularly flexible in the way it works, and it is quite rigid. It has some very strong structures that you have to follow. It could certainly be made more user-friendly to understand and should have fewer requirements for manipulation of the data to create the visualizations. We should also get better support from Celonis, and they also need to make the licensing model slightly different."

"I have experienced lags in response times from customer service. We are not always receiving responses on time."

"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis."

"I have chosen a rating of eight out of ten for Celonis because of the pricing factor, and I believe much can be improved in the visualization."

"We want to see its linkage to Robotic Process Automation. We would also like to see how can it lead to the implementation side and whether the transition is smooth."

"I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies."

"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath. Maybe they can work on making it less expensive."

"Celonis should have the ability to automate in the next release, in my opinion."

More Celonis cons

"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."

"Communication with clients could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is based on APC. It charges you based on the amount of GV that you use."

"Pricing-wise, Celonis is a five out of ten right now because my clients just started with the solution. When my clients start looking at scaling Celonis, the cost will grow. Every user has an additional charge, and every gig of data you bring in costs extra."

"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution requires an annual license. There is room for improvement because it is priced for organizations and not for individuals. For an individual, it would be too expensive for them to use it."

"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath."

"I rate Celonis' pricing a ten out of ten because it is expensive."

"The product is pretty expensive but reasonable."

More Celonis pricing and cost advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Celonis?

Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?

I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Celonis

Compared 54% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 5% of the time

BIC Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 2% of the time

More Celonis Competitors

UiPath Process Mining vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 23% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 17% of the time

More QPR ProcessAnalyzer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Celonis

February 2026

Download Celonis product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Mining

January 2026

Download QPR ProcessAnalyzer product report

Overview

Celonis is the global leader in execution management. Powered by its process mining core, Celonis has evolved from its beginnings as a Process Mining company into an execution management pioneer, enabling companies to unlock execution capacity and perform at full potential. Celonis offers advanced technology in data execution, combining real-time process data, the intelligence to make sense of that data, and the execution capacity to take immediate, decisive action. Celonis’ Execution Management System makes data work for its customers by identifying inefficiencies and weaving interconnected processes together – thereby eliminating billions in corporate inefficiencies, empowering better business decisions and triggering the right actions automatically. Celonis is headquartered in Munich, Germany and New York City, USA and has 15 offices worldwide.

Celonis

Cutting-edge process mining: The fast track to improved business performance
Taking the time to study the flow of your operations is always a good idea – no matter how your business is doing. When things are going well, you may discover ways to make them even better. And if it's not going so well, you need to be sure to understand the real rather than the perceived nature of the problem.

So what's the best way to analyze your operations?
There are basically two options. The first is to ask employees, customers and other stakeholders for feedback. The second way is Process Mining. In other words: you ask the data.

Gathering information from the people involved with your business can be very valuable, but it may not give you the full picture. Process Mining with QPR ProcessAnalyzer will.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer is an enterprise-grade software product for advanced process mining. Smart, quick-to-install, and easy-to-use, it rapidly studies your operational data and immediately identifies concrete ways to improve your business.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

December 2025

Free Report: Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer report.

See our list of best Process Mining vendors.

We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.