No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Celonis vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
AI Data Analysis (7th)
QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 14.4%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Celonis14.4%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.5%
Other83.1%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

EA
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining
Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.
reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's definitely a wonderful tool for clients to understand their operations in real time."
"The product helps clients visualize potential savings by minimizing human errors and reducing manual work."
"I prefer Celonis because of its user-friendliness, visualization and process comparison, spaghetti, and user reviews."
"The analyst role within this solution is very good; it provides a transaction dashboard, and KPI module, that are completely customizable."
"The process mapping is most valuable to us."
"They have a good UI and good features for data extraction, data load, and data transformation."
"We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process."
"Orders are getting faster, clients are happier, and we can also redeploy the resources to process something else."
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
 

Cons

"The tool must have better process graphs."
"The cost could be improved."
"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler."
"Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems."
"Celonis is not entirely stable."
"There are a few things about Celonis that need improvement."
"I have chosen a rating of eight out of ten for Celonis because of the pricing factor, and I believe much can be improved in the visualization."
"Essentially, the solution should allow for more plug and play instead of requiring a person to be adept at a certain level in coding and developing."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Celonis has the highest pricing in the process mining domain."
"Celonis offers free learning possibilities. I am using the free version of Celonis."
"It is quite a significant investment. From a cost perspective, they need to reevaluate the licensing model. The cost is justified, but they need to make the licensing model slightly different."
"Evaluating the price of the solution can be a difficult question. It is all about the business case and the return of the investments. That is typically how we also see this type of solution. It depends very much on the return. The entry-level is focused on enterprise size companies, for the SMB segment is it is out of their range. It is definitely expensive."
"The solution’s pricing is high when compared to other process mining tools."
"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations."
"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise44
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.
What needs improvement with Celonis?
Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as stron...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.