Qualibrate vs Testim comparison

Qualibrate and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Qualibrate is ranked #32, while Testim is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. Qualibrate holds a 1.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qualibrate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

Qualibrate

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

1,432 Views
1,074 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,693 Views
2,216 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualibrate

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qualibrate and Testim are test automation tools. Testim seems to have the upper hand due to its robust AI-driven features and wide technology support, despite its higher costs.

Features: Key features of Qualibrate include its easy script creation and maintenance, SAP integration, and low-code approach. Testim offers advanced AI-driven capabilities, broad technology stack support, and automation accuracy.

Room for Improvement: Qualibrate could enhance its cloud-based accessibility, expand technology integration beyond SAP, and improve AI-driven capabilities. Testim might focus on reducing its learning curve, offering more competitive pricing, and simplifying script maintenance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Testim features straightforward deployment and instant cloud-based access, reducing setup time. Qualibrate offers rich documentation and responsive service, though its setup is more traditional.

Pricing and ROI: Qualibrate presents competitive setup costs and rapid ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. Testim has a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through efficiency and comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualibrate vs. Testim Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate vs. Testim

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

32nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (21st)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Qualibrate is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.1%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Testim	2.1%
Qualibrate	1.4%
Other	96.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

it_user1760325

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We do see the long-term value in terms of time savings and the stress it is going to alleviate for the team."

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

"Overall, we are really happy with it."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

"With Qualibrate, when we looked at the time and resources we are saving it was €1.5 million per year, mostly because of the move away from manual testing."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people; now, we do it in one night."

More Qualibrate pros

"The stability has been great; we can add stable tests very easily and improve our automation coverage, which allows us to deploy a new version into production every few days with minimum manual labor."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The Testim technical support is very responsive and worked with a specific team member on the First Databank side to answer hard technical questions and took enhancement requests as needed."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"It enabled us to cover our app in end-to-end tests very quickly with quality results."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim pros

Cons

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"Their support has been quite good overall, but there have been some frustrations recently where we just feel like we're not always being heard."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Testim?

Before diving into this tool, it's highly recommended to have a basic understanding of Selenium and JavaScript. The company provides excellent training courses for free, and I strongly suggest comp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Qualibrate

Compared 10% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Qualibrate

Compared 9% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Qualibrate

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Qualibrate

Compared 6% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs Qualibrate

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualibrate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 8% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate

June 2026

Download Qualibrate product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

May 2026

Download Testim product report

Overview

Qualibrate is a leading solution for test automation, offering a low-code approach that simplifies automation tasks. Its integration with SAP Solution Manager ensures efficient test management, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their testing processes.

Qualibrate provides user-friendly features that make test script recording and automation accessible to business personnel. It facilitates the reduction of transactions into end-to-end processes, allowing for seamless changes. The tool's integration with SAP Solution Manager enhances test planning, execution scheduling, and process flow management. Users utilize Qualibrate mainly for regression and user acceptance testing within SAP applications, automating standard change processes, and transitioning from manual to automated testing. Its capability to integrate with systems like ServiceNow and host operations in the cloud highlights its versatility in managing critical applications.

What are Qualibrate's most important features?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies test script recording with low-code features.
SAP Integration: Streamlines test management with SAP Solution Manager.
Test Planning: Offers scheduling tools for test execution.
End-to-End Processes: Allows conversion of transactions into comprehensive processes.
Dummy Data Reduction: Minimizes unnecessary data in testing environments.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces manhours through automation of regression testing.
SAP Optimization: Enhances testing strategies specifically for SAP applications.
Cloud Hosting: Ensures reliable testing of critical applications in the cloud.
System Integration: Seamlessly operates with platforms like ServiceNow.

In industries heavily reliant on SAP applications, Qualibrate plays a key role in transitioning from manual to automated regression testing, significantly reducing development complexity. Organizations employing this tool can expect streamlined operations, especially in sectors requiring frequent updates and changes to SAP environments.

Qualibrate

Testim offers a comprehensive automation testing toolkit with features like smart locators and AI functionality. It supports developers and QA teams in managing testing across environments efficiently, even with UI changes.

Testim is designed for automation testing with robust features such as record and playback capabilities, a smart locator system, and a reliable algorithm to maintain stability during UI modifications. Its pre-defined tests, customizable JS testing, and accessibility features improve usability. Organizations benefit from its REST API, CLI, and shared steps, alongside AI advancements that simplify test storage and accelerate delivery times. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in pricing, visual testing, and element selection tools, with calls for enhanced mobile app support and better report features. Multiple test runs may cause stability issues, leaving room for enhanced API integrations and more detailed documentation.

What are Testim's most important features?

Record and Playback: Simplifies test creation with easy-to-use recording tools
Smart Locator: Maintains test accuracy despite UI changes
Accessible Pre-defined Tests: Offers templates for quicker setup
AI Functionality: Enhances test case management and delivery
REST API and CLI: Facilitates integration into development workflows

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Speeds up testing processes and script automation
Usability: Intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse web platforms and applications
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork by sharing steps across projects

Industries primarily employ Testim for automating business end-to-end tests, integrating it within complicated applications. It serves both developers and QA teams by supporting web app testing, API calls, accessibility checks, and JavaScript-focused test data. This low-code platform suits team members with varying technical expertise, adding efficiency to QA and development processes.

Testim

Sample Customers

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate vs. Testim

June 2026

Free Report: Qualibrate vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualibrate vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualibrate vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.