Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Rapid7 and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Rapid7 is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.8, while Seceon is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.0. Rapid7 holds a 2.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Read 32 Rapid7 InsightIDR reviews

6,636 Views
3,252 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,343 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Rapid7 InsightIDR and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform compete in the threat detection and incident response category. Rapid7 InsightIDR has the upper hand in ease of deployment, while Seceon stands out for its AI capabilities and cost-efficiency.

Features: Rapid7 InsightIDR offers comprehensive threat detection, automated incident response, and strong automation. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform provides robust AI-driven threat detection, comprehensive visibility, and advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 InsightIDR needs improvement in customization, reporting features, and flexibility. Seceon requires better integration with third-party tools, enhanced documentation, and support materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 InsightIDR is straightforward to deploy with solid customer support but has some setup complexity. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform's deployment is more challenging due to extensive configuration options, though its customer service is highly rated.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 InsightIDR is often seen as expensive but offers good ROI due to its robust features. Seceon provides competitive pricing and substantial ROI, making it cost-efficient and attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (22nd), Threat Deception Platforms (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (18th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 InsightIDR is 2.2%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Rapid7 InsightIDR	2.2%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

SohailHyder

Head of Cyber Security at Super Secure

Has supported compliance needs for mid-sized organizations but lacks customization and advanced integration

If we pitch Rapid7 InsightIDR against solutions such as SIEMs from Splunk or LogRhythm, it is not as customizable as a SIEM solution is. This is where it can improve if we keep in front the feature sets of a complete SIEM solution. Most common in the market is QRadar, but it is depleting now. It has been taken over by some other products such as Splunk and LogRhythm. If we compare these things with Rapid7 InsightIDR, then there are definitely some gaps that need to be filled. Data retention is also one concern because Rapid7 InsightIDR is cloud-based and operates on a subscription model. Whatever data you want to retain, it has to be paid for separately or it has a cost. Other solutions that are on-premises can have their own infrastructure or they provide some data retention for a month or in some capacity-wise, they provide that solution to them which makes them more attractive.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Enables the use of honey pots, honey users, and honey files to monitor for suspicious patterns."

"InsightIDR’s ability to process millions of transactions per day, and to notify me of the most critical ones, is priceless. InsightIDR has the alerts tuned, and has the ability to quickly drill down to determine the threat level."

"Great coverage of all systems within our network from endpoint to firewall."

"Simple configuration and automatically syncs to the cloud platform."

"Features for user behavior analytics and the rules for attack review are good."

"The platform offers unlimited storage and agent-based solutions."

"The web interface is great — very useful and user-friendly."

"I definitely recommend Rapid7 InsightIDR."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pros

"The solution is stable."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"It offers a holistic approach with multiple solutions blended into one platform."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"The integration capabilities of the solution have certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Currently, it lacks the functionalities provided by Rapid7's User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."

"There are certain limitations with Rapid7 that I am working on."

"The solution needs improvement in threat intelligence. Increasing the depth of intelligence to help users understand more about threats is a possibility. My suggestion is to expand access to other websites or resources."

"The searching feature in Rapid7 InsightIDR needs to evolve"

"Tenable Nessus is easier to deal with. It's more efficient and accurate. InsightIDR is heavier than Tenable in terms of performance and scanning. Rapid7 would be much easier to use if it had a network connector like Tenable. Tenable's connector allows continuous monitoring over the B caps."

"InsightIDR's integration with other solutions could be improved. Also, I'd like more control from the portal over what's happening on the endpoint side. For example, when I see an attack on an endpoint, I want to be able to stop it from the portal."

"If we pitch Rapid7 InsightIDR against solutions such as SIEMs from Splunk or LogRhythm, it is not as customizable as a SIEM solution is."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR cons

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"We are at the client’s end, offering services. They don’t know about security rules and benchmarks. We are working on the discovery and remediation but we don’t really have the intelligence that was available while working with other tools. Human working is also very essential for the solution. The automatic session is impossible to play since it needs to touch Redfin for further analysis. No one has breached our clients."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution depends on the user. But there is a yearly licensing cost."

"It is more reasonably priced than other vendors."

"The solution has a mid-range price point in the market"

"The pricing is good, and it is not very expensive."

"It is on a yearly basis. For our own company, for about 250 users, it was 16,000 euros a year."

"The team is very willing to work with companies. My suggestion is to call the Rapid7 sales department and see how they can help."

"Rapid7 InsightIDR's pricing is reasonable but we have challenges with the Minimum Order Quantity. It is not reasonable for customers who have less than one hundred devices. If they can reduce Minimum Order Quantity, it is good. You have to pay around 5000-6000 dollars per year for the product. The pricing includes maintenance and support costs."

"It is a reasonably priced solution."

More Rapid7 InsightIDR pricing and cost advice

"The price is quite reasonable."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?

For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightIDR?

During simulations or demonstrations, the tool generates alerts, providing details such as the specific application, its origin, and potential threats. For instance, it can identify if an applicati...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightIDR?

The product pricing is very cheap.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs Rapid7 InsightIDR

Compared 4% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightIDR Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR

January 2026

Download Rapid7 InsightIDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

January 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

InsightIDR

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Parsing hundreds of trivial alerts. Managing a mountain of data. Manually forwarding info from your endpoints. Forget that. InsightIDR instantly arms you with the insight you need to make better decisions across the incident detection and response lifecycle, faster.

Rapid7

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Liberty Wines, Pioneer Telephone, Visier

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.