ReadyAPI Test vs Testim comparison

SmartBear and Testim are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #25, while Testim is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. SmartBear holds a 2.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Testim’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Testim users who would recommend it.

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

2,097 Views
944 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,975 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Testim

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ReadyAPI Test and Testim are competing products in the software testing space. Based on comparisons, Testim stands out for its advanced feature set, whereas ReadyAPI Test receives accolades for its pricing and support.

Features: ReadyAPI Test offers extensive API testing, including security and performance capabilities, and integrates well with DevOps tools. Testim shines with AI-driven test creation, powerful automation, and adaptability to various testing requirements. The primary distinction is Testim's innovative technology opposed to ReadyAPI's concentration on API testing essentials.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its user interface for greater accessibility and streamline its scripting capabilities. Additionally, improving integration support for more platforms could be beneficial. Testim should address its complex learning curve and provide more in-depth documentation. Simplifying manual configurations would also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is known for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer service. Testim's advanced AI features require technical proficiency for deployment, presenting a learning curve, but its customer service is praised for being responsive and supportive. The main difference is ReadyAPI's user-friendliness compared to Testim's complex deployment.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is often commended for its competitive pricing, offering good ROI with its comprehensive feature set at reasonable rates. Although Testim incurs a higher initial cost, its ROI is considered worthwhile due to its advanced automation features. The key contrast lies in ReadyAPI's affordability and Testim's value-driven investment.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (13th), API Testing Tools (12th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 2.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Testim	2.8%
ReadyAPI Test	2.1%
Other	95.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"The solution scales well."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

Cons

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"Automation features are not user-friendly."

"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"The cost is not that bad."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"It is free of charge."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 14% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

March 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Testim

February 2026

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

SoapUI NG Pro

No data available

Overview

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Sample Customers

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim

March 2026

Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Testim report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.