No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Reflect vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Reflect
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (42nd), AI Quality Assurance (3rd)
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (7th), Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Reflect is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud3.2%
Reflect0.8%
Other96.0%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2845779 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gerente De Proyectos at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Automated login and invoice tests have reduced manual effort and now streamline daily workflows
At the moment, I have no complaints about how Reflect could improve. I would not like to add anything else about possible improvements or aspects that could be optimized in the future. I give it a rating of eight because of the help it has given me, but sometimes the test cases do not work well with certain technology. I have already spoken about compatibility improvements with the developers and they told me they are working on it.
SK
Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration
I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Reflect has positively impacted my organization by helping to reduce testing time by 80%."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
 

Cons

"I give it a rating of eight because of the help it has given me, but sometimes the test cases do not work well with certain technology."
"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."
"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."
"The pricing isn't as low as other options."
"More precise logging would be appreciated."
"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."
"The product releases sometimes have issues."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"The test manager component could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."
"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."
"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."
"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."
"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."
"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Construction Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Reflect?
At the moment, I have no complaints about how Reflect could improve. I would not like to add anything else about possible improvements or aspects that could be optimized in the future. I give it a ...
What is your primary use case for Reflect?
My main use case for Reflect is test automation. I have a case where I need to automate the login of a tool, and with Reflect, I can automate it for day-to-day use of that test. I can also automate...
What advice do you have for others considering Reflect?
My advice to other professionals considering using Reflect is not to be afraid to try the tool. It is a very useful and easy-to-use tool that is intuitive, and professionals should not be afraid to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?
My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Test Suite
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.