SAP Replication Server vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

SAP and Broadcom are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. SAP is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. SAP holds a 1.8% mindshare in DDM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

2,027 Views
527 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

5,902 Views
1,476 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

SAP Replication Server and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions are key players in the data management solutions category. SAP Replication Server might have the edge in pricing and support, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers a more feature-rich product, potentially justifying its higher cost.

Features: SAP Replication Server offers real-time data replication, high availability, and disaster recovery solutions, making it robust for enterprise data management. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions emphasizes application modernization, seamless integration with cloud-native environments, and advanced tools for Kubernetes orchestration and scaling, enhancing its flexibility for cloud-based applications.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could improve in cloud integration and ease of deployment in modern cloud environments. It can also benefit from enhanced user interface features. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions might need improvements in initial setup complexities and would benefit from more streamlined application management procedures. Both could focus on enhancing their documentation for faster onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions excels in cloud deployment, supporting scalability and integration with DevOps practices, and is noted for accessible and agile customer service. SAP Replication Server is efficient in traditional setups; however, cloud deployments can be challenging. SAP’s support is highly regarded for depth in enterprise solutions.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server is appealing for cost-effective replication solutions, offering favorable ROI with its focused capabilities. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions, with higher initial costs, promises substantial ROI through a comprehensive feature set for cloud-native transformation, justifying the investment for modern cloud application development priorities.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Database Development and Management

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (45th)

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Database Development and Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (13th), Data Warehouse (8th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	2.8%
SAP Replication Server	1.8%
Other	95.4%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1834542

Finance Business Process Improvement, Transformation and Project Management at a consultancy with self employed

Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage

The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades. As a company, you're either hiring or paying an outsourcer to do that, and you have to manage it, keep up with the updates to the hardware, software, and the operating system. It's very expensive because there's a lot to control and take care of.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

More SAP Replication Server pros

"The most valuable feature is it’s robustness."

"RabbitMQ helped us develop a highly scalable system by decoupling the front end and back end, easily withstanding and passing stress and load testing with more than 10K API calls while providing message queuing and a distributed environment."

"Applying message queues in general has helped my company, BuzzNumber, to scale easily with the load."

"After almost two years' usage in our production environment, I am impressed by how stable the platform is - even when running on Windows Server 2012."

"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."

"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"

"The parallel load features mean that Greenplum is capable of high-volume data loading in parallel to all of the cluster segments, which is really valuable."

"It stands out because it's opensource and cost effective, and it does everything pretty well."

Cons

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"Setup was a little complex."

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

More SAP Replication Server cons

"The performance needs to be improved."

"When they are full, we might lose everything."

"It should support more feature that do exist on Postgres – like JSON datatype."

"I was struggling with installing a few things. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality (like fully down processing, etc.) would be helpful in future releases."

"One of the disadvantages, not a disadvantage with the product itself, but overall, is the expertise in the marketplace. It's not easy to find a Greenplum administrator in the market, compared to other products such as Oracle."

"Improve the ability to handle the large message load."

"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"Pricing is good compared to other products. It's fine."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"This is an open source solution."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?

It's a pretty good product and stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?

It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware RabbitMQ?

Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

April 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

March 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Sybase Replication Server

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2026

Free Report: SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Replication Server vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.