

ScienceLogic and Veeam Data Platform compete in the IT management and backup categories. ScienceLogic is superior in monitoring and analytics, while Veeam excels in backup and recovery.
Features: ScienceLogic offers customizable dashboards, dynamic apps for specific devices, and true multi-tenancy. Its event correlation and predictive analytics are beneficial for various environments. Veeam Data Platform is recognized for its backup and replication capabilities, instant recovery, and integration with high-availability systems. It is appreciated for efficient backups and granular recovery options.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users seek better reporting, UI simplification, improved integration with external platforms, and enhanced application monitoring support. Suggestions also include chat support and simplified configurations. Veeam Data Platform could improve cloud integration, offering better pricing structures and enhanced cyber recovery features. Users note the high licensing cost and request more flexible options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, with customer service praised for personalized and proactive support. Its support team is known for knowledge and responsiveness. Veeam Data Platform is primarily deployable on-premises, with positive customer service feedback. However, users mention that support response times and complex configurations could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is seen as cost-effective given its robust features, though some find it expensive due to its enterprise focus. It offers varied licensing models, and users report satisfactory ROI due to improved monitoring and reduced incident management time. Veeam Data Platform, while more expensive in licensing, offers competitive pricing. Users justify costs through reliable backup solutions and report strong ROI, citing data protection and resource savings.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
Most cases are handled perfectly.
I would rate their technical support a 10 out of 10.
The escalation from first, second to third tier is sometimes very long-lasting, but the resolve rate is quite high.
It involves acquiring additional licenses as needed.
I would rate the scalability part of Veeam Data Platform 10 out of 10 because we have the ability to scale out the product at any time with scale-out backup repositories and can add licenses as needed.
In order to scale Veeam Data Platform, we have to pay a lot more money.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
There are no issues with stability in Veeam Data Platform.
I can say the stability of Veeam Data Platform is almost 8 to 9, as the cluster functionality was not there in earlier platforms such as version 12, but is provided in version 13.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
The improvement we would like to see is the option to scale Veeam Data up in smaller sections rather than large sections, which requires paying much more.
Reducing it by 20% would make it more accessible to a broader range of customers.
OpenStack is something Veeam Data Platform doesn't support, and they haven't indicated that they will support it in the future.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
I don't consider the price expensive given its importance.
A reduction of 20% in the current cost would make the solution more attractive to clients.
Veeam Data Platform is more expensive than OpenStack because we pay for it in US dollars, while we pay for OpenStack in Egyptian pounds.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
The platform is user-friendly, comprehensive, and compatible with numerous market solutions, including virtualization and bare metal servers.
The most important aspect of this platform is data security with immutable data in the storage.
Veeam Data Platform is valuable for its stability and the ability to easily contact support for assistance.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Veeam Data Platform | 0.9% |
| ScienceLogic | 2.4% |
| Other | 96.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 217 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 99 |
| Large Enterprise | 139 |
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
Veeam Data Platform is a leader in data resilience, providing businesses with reliable and secure backup, recovery, and advanced data insights. It is designed to combat today's cyber threats while ensuring data remains protected, adaptable, and recoverable.
Engineered to offer a seamless and powerful data resilience experience, Veeam Data Platform helps organizations with intelligent protection beyond just backup. It enables orchestrated and verifiable recovery processes, helping maintain continuous operations. By offering integrated solutions against evolving cyber threats, this platform assures businesses of data availability and precision restoration, empowering them to remain resilient under any circumstances. Its robust security features, coupled with efficient replication and deduplication benefits, deliver confidence in data management across hybrid and cloud deployments.
What features make Veeam Data Platform stand out?Veeam Data Platform is primarily used for managing backup and replication across VMware and Hyper-V environments, supporting both cloud and on-premises infrastructures. In industries managing significant IT services, it assists in disaster recovery and virtual machine protection, enhancing business continuity. Its integration with applications like Microsoft Office 365 ensures reliable data protection and quick recovery, making it beneficial for those looking to streamline operations across diverse deployment scenarios.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.