SCOM vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Tenable are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 86% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

12,174 Views
8,035 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Read 4 Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SCOM and Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SCOM

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (4th), Network Monitoring Software (26th)

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

SATYAVRAT MISHRA

AVP - Corporate IT at Godrej

A stable security solution with a useful visibility feature

We use it to scan all of our servers and network devices on a monthly basis. Then based on the outcome, we do the patching depending on high availability, and so on Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability has been great."

"The product’s auto-remediation feature helps with automation."

"It's a lot more powerful than people realize, and I believe people become dissatisfied with it because of the complicated setup, but once it's up and running, it's pretty amazing at what it can do."

"They have great integration with the active directory."

"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."

"SCOM is a great monitoring tool."

"Ticket Automation has taken a considerable load from the NOC."

"With Operations Manager, you have extract reporting capabilities and multiple report libraries that you can select from to customize reports to your own granular requirements."

More SCOM pros

"Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last year, where were we were and where we currently stand."

"The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in."

"Tenable is already in the top three risk management solutions and Tenable is already a leader of vulnerability risk management."

"The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive."

"SecurityCenter enables us to find all the vulnerabilities, export that data, prioritize it, and address the highest-risk vulnerabilities."

"The level of visibility Tenable provides us, compared to our previous solutions is night and day."

"The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies."

"We can manage everything with only a single console on the Tenable SecurityCenter. We can pull and define the policy. We can perform every task on the Tenable SecurityCenter."

Cons

"SCOM is not as straightforward in terms of user interface or general experience, which could be improved."

"The interface is a little bit cumbersome and certain actions could be simplified."

"At this point, only monitoring a network device is not good enough."

"This product is not easy to use."

"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."

"The System Centre Operations Manager (SCOM) is great at alerting you when something breaks. It's not so great at reporting."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications. They can include this feature in the next release. If it is in the cloud, we can have scalability by using Kubernetes. The container is containerized, packaged, and managed using Kubernetes. This feature is not there in SCOM. Going forward, if they can focus on that, it will be great."

"The price could be improved."

More SCOM cons

"One area which is missing is cloud security because there are a lot of configurations. Rapid7 has a product called a DV cloud. I would like to have a similar kind of solution and feature."

"For dynamic application scanning, it's a two out of ten."

"There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved."

"When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in."

"In terms of what could be improved, some customers have a problem with SecurityCenter's ticket system. If I want them to assign one of the issues, they may want to assign someone to it or to assign it somewhere else and I may want to break up the ticket."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

"We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it."

"The pricing is good, and it's part of their system center suite."

"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."

"The pricing and licensing are fair."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"It is more expensive than the competition."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

"We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that."

"Pricing-wise, it's fine. It's not an expensive product. That's not an issue."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

October 2026

Download SCOM product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

October 2026

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] report

Download Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] product report

Also Known As

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV

Overview

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Dialog Telekom

Methodist Healthcare Ministries

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.