Sophos Network Access Control vs Twingate comparison

Sophos and Twingate are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Sophos is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while Twingate is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Sophos holds a 2.2% mindshare in NAC, compared to Twingate’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Sophos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Twingate users who would recommend it.

Sophos Network Access Control

Read 24 Sophos Network Access Control reviews

1,030 Views
999 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Twingate

Read 1 Twingate review

2,428 Views
170 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sophos Network Access Control

Twingate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sophos Network Access Control and Twingate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).

To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sophos Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Twingate

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (13th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (14th), ZTNA as a Service (16th), ZTNA (5th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control is 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Twingate is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sophos Network Access Control	2.2%
Twingate	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

HirenPatel2

Manager at rspl

Have faced delays in support despite strong multi-layer policy configuration

I have observed some disadvantages as we have experienced one particular problem. We were facing an issue of synchronization of the endpoint with our firewall with help on a cloud for heartbeat syncing. However, it was not syncing as per our requirement. The user has to connect our firewall with the help of VPN. We were supposed to assume a solution on a cloud, which has good synchronization on a cloud with Sophos Central. It will sync with our firewall as well with the help of Sophos Central. Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control. We have to connect with VPN. We are expecting that if we have already installed an endpoint on our system and it is connected to the internet, then it must be synchronized on a cloud with Sophos Central. Through Sophos Central, it must connect with our firewall. If the endpoint is configured on Sophos Central and the firewall is also configured in Sophos Central, then there should be no need to connect to VPN.

Read full review

Joey Benamy

Senior Cyber Liability Engineer at OncoLens

Helps reduce access-related support tickets, is quick to deploy, and streamlines onboarding

We were able to add Twingate into our infrastructure without having to change our infrastructure or how people work. We reaped the benefits of Twingate immediately because it replaced an alternative solution with a lot of overhead. Twingate helped reduce access-related support tickets by 80 percent. Twingate streamlines onboarding for our company, especially for the engineering team, by automating resource access through directory integrations. New employees generally require no manual configuration within Twingate, saving us significant time and effort. The resiliency is directly proportional to the level of control we exert over its components. We can manage Twingate connectors to support high availability, ensuring the system is as reliable as needed. This flexibility and control enhance Twingate's resiliency capabilities significantly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The installation is very straightforward."

"The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer."

"Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

"The biggest advantage of Sophos Network Access Control is that it is very synchronized with the security on both the endpoint and the firewall on a single platform, and it is easy to maintain."

"The pricing is very reasonable and you can negotiate on the price."

"The platform's most valuable features include robust reporting and analytics capabilities, which provide deep insights into our sales performance and customer behavior."

"The most valuable features of Sophos Network Access Control are the quick response times to threats and reliable security."

"Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything."

More Sophos Network Access Control pros

"I appreciate Twingate's developer-first approach, particularly its excellent developer tools for deployment and management."

Cons

"The solution could increase the integration with other platforms or other systems. This would be very useful."

"It would be beneficial to consider some improvements regarding the dashboard."

"I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device."

"Sometimes we encounter intermediate-level support staff who use trial-and-error approaches, but sometimes we receive support from excellent staff members who resolve issues within seconds."

"The interface on the cloud could be a bit better - just to give more performance on it."

"Users are not controlled by role-based access; it's basically device-based control. The definition of role-based control is a little vague here because on the cloud level, it regulates access rather than tasks."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"The difficult thing was finding the metrics."

More Sophos Network Access Control cons

"Twingate's lack of native support for Windows Server is a significant limitation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."

"Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."

"I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."

"It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

"It is quite expensive."

"Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."

"Twingate's pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sophos Network Access Control?

I think the pricing of the solution is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sophos Network Access Control?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sophos Network Access Control?

I am currently using the product as a customer. We are using Sophos Network Access Control solution for security purposes and security analysis only.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Twingate?

Twingate's pricing is fair.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Twingate?

Twingate's lack of native support for Windows Server is a significant limitation. While it hasn't directly affected my company, I've encountered this issue when assisting others. Additionally, the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Twingate?

We use Twingate for remote access.

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 20% of the time

Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 13% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 10% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Sophos Network Access Control

Compared 8% of the time

More Sophos Network Access Control Competitors

Tailscale vs Twingate

Compared 33% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Twingate

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Twingate

Compared 7% of the time

NordLayer vs Twingate

Compared 5% of the time

Appgate SDP vs Twingate

Compared 4% of the time

More Twingate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sophos Network Access Control

January 2026

Download Sophos Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

January 2026

Download Twingate product report

Overview

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

Sophos

Twingate is a cloud-based network security platform that offers secure, zero-trust access to corporate applications and resources. Its primary use case is to provide remote access to employees, contractors, and partners, allowing them to work securely from anywhere. Twingate's most valuable functionality is its ability to create secure access policies based on user identity, device, and network context. This enables organizations to enforce granular access controls, reducing the risk of data breaches and insider threats.

By leveraging Twingate, organizations can improve their security posture and reduce the IT burden of managing traditional VPNs. It also helps organizations to comply with regulatory requirements, such as GDPR and HIPAA, by providing a secure and auditable access solution.

Twingate

Sample Customers

Rushmoor Borough Council

Blend, Modern Health, Webflow, Liberis, Cerebral, Homebase, Bloomreach, Cameo, Hippo and Bitpanda

Buyer's Guide

Network Access Control (NAC)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.