Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Sophos Network Access Control Logo

Sophos Network Access Control Reviews

Vendor: Sophos
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Sophos Network Access Control?

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.
Get the Sophos Network Access Control Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Sophos Network Access Control, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass and more!
Sophos Network Access Control is the #8 ranked solution in top Network Access Control (NAC) solutions. PeerSpot users give Sophos Network Access Control an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Sophos Network Access Control is most commonly compared to Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE): Sophos Network Access Control vs Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE). Sophos Network Access Control is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 49% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 12% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Sophos Network Access Control
September 2025
Get the report
Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Featured Sophos Network Access Control reviews

Read more reviews

Sophos Network Access Control mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Sophos Network Access Control in the Network Access Control (NAC) category stands at 1.8%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Sophos Network Access Control1.8%
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)24.2%
Aruba ClearPass23.6%
Other50.4%
Network Access Control (NAC)

PeerResearch reports based on Sophos Network Access Control reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryNetwork Access Control (NAC)Oct 3, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSophos Network Access Control vs Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)Oct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSophos Network Access Control vs Aruba ClearPassOct 3, 2025Download
ComparisonSophos Network Access Control vs Fortinet FortiNACOct 3, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)4.124.2%87%143 interviewsAdd to research
Aruba ClearPass4.323.6%94%88 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Sophos Network Access Control offers comprehensive threat analysis, endpoint management, and low resource utilization. It provides global visibility across infrastructure, integrating the OSI layer. Its user-friendly interface and single management solution facilitate centralized control. Strong security features include IP blocking, web protection, and role-based controls. Scalable and reliable, it integrates well with other solutions. Users appreciate wifi control and quick threat responses. The analytics capabilities and posture management for compliance add substantial value.
  • "The biggest advantage of Sophos Network Access Control is that it is very synchronized with the security on both the endpoint and the firewall on a single platform, and it is easy to maintain."
  • "The role-based access controls feature of Sophos Network Access Control allows persons at different positions in an organization to have different types of roles."
  • "Sophos Network Access Control saves our clients time and money."

Room for Improvement

Sophos Network Access Control experiences slow processing due to high resource consumption, especially in setups with limited memory. The system interface is often cluttered and unintuitive, affecting usability. Integrating with Active Directory and improved compatibility with other devices is necessary. Security features require enhancement, including machine learning and AI implementation. Pricing remains a concern as costs have increased. Enhanced reporting and better policy management would streamline its functionality for large organizations.
  • "Endpoint and firewall synchronization is not as smooth as we are expecting from Sophos Network Access Control."
  • "Users are not controlled by role-based access; it's basically device-based control. The definition of role-based control is a little vague here because on the cloud level, it regulates access rather than tasks."
  • "Sophos Network Access Control could be improved by having an ASIC chip similar to FortiNAC, as this would provide better processing for big organizations."

Pricing

Sophos Network Access Control pricing involves annual licenses, viewed as modular yet costly. Various users highlight its comparative affordability against solutions like Cisco and Palo Alto, though noted as more expensive than Norton. Setup involves initial and maintenance costs, potentially straining budgets. Users rate pricing from three to six out of ten on affordability. The solution is considered expensive, yet negotiable, with some satisfied with long-term agreements. Scalability may increase expenses with additional devices.
  • "Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Sophos Network Access Control for managing devices and securing network access. They focus on integrations, endpoint security, and user authentication to ensure compliance with corporate policies. Sophos enhances cybersecurity with features like firewalls, VPNs, email security, and network visibility. It prevents unauthorized access and malware, leveraging encrypted VPN channels and AI algorithms for predictive security. Enterprises utilize it across various environments to protect data and manage access control efficiently.

Service and Support

Sophos Network Access Control offers strong customer service and assistance, with quick and helpful responses through chat or phone. Users appreciate the knowledgeable and responsive support team, finding their assistance reliable and timely. Licensing issues don’t hinder support efforts. Users in Africa report some delays due to time zones and internet. Security and technology are areas some users find lacking compared to other vendors, but overall, users report high satisfaction and swift problem resolution.

Deployment

Sophos Network Access Control's initial setup is generally straightforward and user-friendly, often completed within one to two weeks, though some rate it between four and eight out of ten for ease. Companies report that deployment and configuration may require knowledgeable personnel but usually only a few individuals. The setup is uncomplicated with appropriate expertise, though it might demand additional resources for new users. Maintenance typically involves periodic updates and policy adjustments.

Scalability

Sophos Network Access Control demonstrates strong scalability, accommodating both medium-sized and enterprise-level needs without performance issues. Organizations benefit from its modular and flexible nature, allowing easy expansion. However, pricing based on devices can challenge smaller organizations. Cloud-based capabilities enable handling large client volumes. Light containers enhance performance. While issues may arise if larger devices are needed, clients generally find it suitable for growing user bases.

Stability

Sophos Network Access Control is widely regarded as stable and reliable, often rated close to ten for stability. Users report no bugs, glitches, or crashes, and it is noted for good performance and minimal downtime. Many find Sophos particularly effective when combined with other Sophos products, enhancing communication. Despite some reporting false positives, it is considered secure and dependable. Technical support is appreciated for addressing setup issues efficiently.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Sophos Network Access Control Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business54
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise75
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Media Company
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
University
4%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
4%
Transportation Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Leisure / Travel Company
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Sports Company
1%

Compare Sophos Network Access Control with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Sophos Network Access Control

Sophos Network Access Control customers

Rushmoor Borough Council

Related questions

  • 35
PRICING FOR FORESCOUT CT10K APPLIANCE
  • 11
When evaluating Network Access Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 94
Which is the best choice of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?
  • 28
What is your recommended Network Access Control (NAC) solution for an enterprise?
  • 109
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs Fortinet FortiNAC: which solution is better and why?
  • 33
What network access control software do you recommend?
  • 30
Why is NAC (network access control) important?
  • 105
Why is Network Access Control (NAC) important for companies?
  • 18
Has anyone ever heard of secureaccess.com?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Network Access Control (NAC)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Sophos Network Access Control
Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Aruba ClearPass vs Sophos Network Access Control
Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC vs Sophos Network Access Control
Forescout Platform vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Forescout Platform vs Sophos Network Access Control
Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Twingate vs Sophos Network Access Control
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Sophos Network Access Control
Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Portnox vs Sophos Network Access Control
Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Ruckus Cloudpath vs Sophos Network Access Control
ExtremeControl vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
ExtremeControl vs Sophos Network Access Control
Ivanti NAC vs Sophos Network Access Control Logo
Ivanti NAC vs Sophos Network Access Control
See all alternatives
 
Sophos Network Access Control Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager at rspl4.0I find Sophos Network Access Control easy to install and manage, with effective policy enforcement and integration, though endpoint-firewall synchronization via cloud needs improvement and support could be more responsive for critical, real-time security needs.
technical associate at seamlessinfotech.com3.5Sophos Network Access Control provides centralized access control, essential for authenticating new users. Its features include device quarantine and role-based access control, but it lacks the ASIC chip needed for high processing speeds in large organizations. Integration capabilities are commendable.
Founder/Director at Augesys Solutions Pvt Ltd4.5I use Sophos Network Access Control for Zero Trust, endpoint, and email security; it's easy to deploy, stable, scalable, and competitively priced, though role-based access and SIEM functionality could be improved for better control and monitoring.
CEO at MARVIV SRLS4.5I use Sophos Network Access Control for cybersecurity, benefiting from its easy setup, stability, and responsive support. However, it needs a better user interface and more advanced AI features for enhanced security, similar to CrowdStrike.
Cybersecurity Network Engineer at Reliance Infosystems3.5As a provider of network security services, we value Sophos for its robust firewall environment offering advanced features like zero-day protection and application control. Its integrated platform saves costs, though continual improvements are beneficial. We are evaluating Fortinet for comparison.
Information Technology Department at Sunflag Iron and Steel Co Ltd4.0We use Sophos Network Access Control for email security, web security, VPN solutions, and network visibility, integrating it with SAP ERP to prevent malware and unauthorized access. While satisfied with its performance, we suggest a simpler user interface. Previously, we used Cisco but found it costly.
Deputy Manager IT at Asia Petroleum Limited5.0I find the web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering features of Sophos Network Access Control valuable. However, its slow interface, loading times, and reporting need improvement, especially for large companies with many users.
Founder at itservicedeskafrika3.0I find Sophos Network Access Control's IP blocking feature extremely valuable, but its high resource demands and expense are concerns. It requires significant system upgrades and pricing issues in Nigeria make it less affordable, prompting some users to switch to alternatives.