Stormshield Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Stormshield and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Stormshield is ranked #50, while Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.2. Stormshield holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Stormshield users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Stormshield Endpoint Security and Symantec Endpoint Security are two prominent endpoint protection solutions. Symantec Endpoint Security generally appears superior in terms of comprehensive features, although Stormshield Endpoint Security is often highlighted for better pricing and support according to user reviews.

Features: Stormshield Endpoint Security is praised for its strong firewall protection and advanced threat detection capabilities. Symantec Endpoint Security is noted for its extensive malware protection and robust ransomware defense. Users give Symantec an edge in the variety and effectiveness of its security features compared to Stormshield.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Stormshield Endpoint Security could benefit from more intuitive management tools and enhanced reporting capabilities. Symantec Endpoint Security reviews indicate a need for performance optimization to reduce system impact. Symantec's performance issues are seen as more critical compared to Stormshield's interface improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stormshield Endpoint Security is reported to have a straightforward deployment process with helpful customer support. Symantec Endpoint Security, while also easy to deploy, has mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Stormshield's ease of deployment combined with superior customer service gives it a slight advantage here.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Stormshield Endpoint Security to be more cost-effective with faster ROI. Symantec Endpoint Security, although deemed expensive, is justified by its extensive feature set and reliable performance, suggesting a worthwhile investment despite higher costs. Stormshield’s financial benefits are more clearly recognized in user reviews.

To learn more, read our detailed Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stormshield Endpoint Security is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.0%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Symantec Endpoint Security	4.0%
Stormshield Endpoint Security	0.8%
Other	91.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

it_user745593

Senior Project Manager, PMP at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Protects the global station and has good stability

The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better. The solution needs better integration with products, if it did, it would have the assumption of better security. I've been using the solution since…

Read full review

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl

Behavioral protection has blocked ransomware and now saves extensive recovery and audit time

The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Security is its effectiveness in malware protection. Its malware protection capabilities stand out due to their ease of management. Although multiple tools assist in this process, managing them all can sometimes be challenging. In terms of malware protection, Symantec Endpoint Security performs well, and its mechanisms, tactics, and techniques are effective. Symantec Endpoint Security offers robust features such as advanced reporting capabilities with a customizable dashboard that integrates EDR timelines, threat maps, and compliance metrics into a single view. Additionally, reports can be exported to PDF or CSV formats, making reporting one of its strong points. It also provides comprehensive device control features, which block unauthorized USB devices and support whitelisting. This helps prevent data exfiltration and phishing scenarios without disrupting user workflows.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the fact that it was running in the background and it would intercept any weird stuff, and the fact that it would send things directly to the cloud for sandboxing. It's quite practical."

"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."

"The most valuable aspect of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for me is its integration with AI detection, where we get to know the behavioral detection based on users, traffic patterns, and different services that we consume."

"Overall, it's a great platform; it integrates very well with other solutions from Palo Alto and also with our vendors, the ease of use is excellent, I love the root cause analysis from Cortex, which is amazing, and in a few clicks you can have the full root cause."

"I recommend this solution to others because it is easy to manage, reliable, and overall good to use."

"The solution allows us to gain remote access without the user's knowledge and take the necessary actions on the device."

"Palo Alto is the best security solution in the market."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"If you need a Windows based multi-functional end-point security solution then this product is for you."

"The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station."

"It is very good for preventing cryptolocker attacks."

"Its ease of use in deploying it and regular updates are most valuable."

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to manage antivirus security. There is an admin console that helps you make policies and do deployment of the clients, to make them reachable and to deploy updates."

"I find the most valuable feature is that the product works on Linux and Microsoft Windows, and I think it is one of the best solutions to implement or host IPs."

"One great benefit is we do not need to activate a license for every endpoint."

"The performance of Symantec End-User Endpoint Security is very good, and it does not slow down the computer like other solutions."

"Some of the features that were important were a built-in firewall and device control."

"This is a very complete solution."

"Symantec is very user-friendly, the interface and functions are very simple for everyone to understand. Additionally, it's a very robust system."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"It takes time to scan the servers and devices."

"The solution can never really be an on-premises solution based simply on the way it is set up. It needs metadata to run and improve. Having an on-premises solution would cut it off from making improvements."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"In general, the price could be more competitive."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Only Windows based. Dependence on MS updates and service start-up priority."

"The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better."

"Release speed for newer versions. When a new OS is released, you've got to wait half year to get the new version that covers the new Windows OS."

"We have encountered some major bugs, which cause DSOD on all our machines during updates."

"One suggestion I have for both regular and mobile would be to collect all the information about installed software, such as versions, and give that information to the manager to help with software management. That would be a huge advantage for everyone who administers these tools."

"The management functionality in the on-premises version was terrible, although it was still very good for protection."

"The support needs to be better. When we upgrade, we can run into issues, and it's hard to get the help we require."

"Nowadays, threats are changing, and they are moving more towards script control and zero-day attacks, so we would like to have more control similar to an EDR solution."

"It is not cheap."

"Within the last three or four months, we decided to drop Symantec on its own because of some issues we have with the company."

"As soon as we removed Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, the user did see a lot of improvement in their hardware performance, such as the CPU usage being lower and memory resources going down."

More Symantec Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"The EDR options are costlier than other products."

"This is not the cheapest product and I know others that are most cost-effective, although it is difficult to compare because it depends on the features."

"Its price is reasonable."

"It is the better product, even if it is a little on the higher side."

"Zero-day threat or advanced attacks should be part of the endpoint. The product should not require you to buy a separate license."

"The licensing costs are huge compared to what is normally included in the licensing with other products such as the Microsoft products that we're using. We're paying between $300 and $400 per seat."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing."

More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

20%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valu...

See all answers

Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?

We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?

Symantec Endpoint Security's pricing is better than most offerings based on my research. It seems to be half the cost...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Stormshield Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Stormshield Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Stormshield Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Stormshield Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection vs Stormshield Endpoint Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Stormshield Endpoint Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Morphisec vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Symantec Endpoint Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

October 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download Stormshield Endpoint Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Security

October 2026

Download Symantec Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

SkyRecon Systems StormShield Security Suite

Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Stormshield Endpoint Security provides robust protection, safeguarding critical business operations against evolving threats. It addresses security needs with advanced solutions that ensure comprehensive threat management and mitigation.

Stormshield Endpoint Security is tailored for a tech-savvy audience seeking reliable defense mechanisms to protect sensitive data. It combines cutting-edge technologies to provide a high level of security. Whether dealing with targeted attacks or generic malware, businesses trust its versatile approach, running seamless operations while mitigating risks. It supports endpoints with minimal impact on performance, ensuring continuous productivity.

What are the key features of Stormshield Endpoint Security?

Behavioral Analysis: Detects potential threats by analyzing activity patterns, ensuring proactive security measures.
Application Control: Restricts unwanted applications, allowing only approved programs to run, reducing vulnerability.
Network Protection: Secures data in transit by monitoring network traffic and preventing unauthorized access.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Utilizes threat intelligence to anticipate attacks and respond swiftly to new security challenges.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Stormshield Endpoint Security?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces potential losses from security breaches, justifying investment with strong threat prevention.
Scalability: Adapts to business growth, offering consistent protection without requiring constant upgrades.
Easy Deployment: Provides straightforward installation and configuration, allowing quick adoption and minimal downtime.
Compliance Support: Helps meet industry standards, ensuring regulatory adherence for enhanced trust and credibility.

In sectors like finance and healthcare, Stormshield Endpoint Security is implemented to safeguard sensitive client data and meet compliance standards. In manufacturing, it secures networks from industrial espionage, addressing unique challenges by providing tailored security enhancing business resilience.

Stormshield

Symantec Endpoint Security is a comprehensive protection tool designed for antimalware and antivirus defense. Providing centralized management and smooth deployment, it effectively secures environments from small businesses to extensive networks.

Symantec Endpoint Security serves organizations by offering robust protection with features like rapid deployment and centralized management, critical for securing workstations and servers. While appreciated for efficient resource utilization and stable operation, some users report issues with virus detection and cumbersome updates. Pricing is often considered high. It is a popular choice among IT consultants, academic institutions, and service providers for its ability to manage broad and varied security needs efficiently.

What are the key features of Symantec Endpoint Security?

Centralized Management: Streamlines security operations for ease of handling across networks.
Malware and Antivirus Protection: Provides real-time threat detection and EDR capabilities.
Application and Device Control: Manages access and control policies effectively.
SONAR and IPS: Enhances proactive malware scanning and intrusion prevention.
Active Directory Integration: Supports seamless integration with existing systems.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Symantec Endpoint Security?

Reliable Support: Offers assistance which, while helpful, can vary in effectiveness.
Advanced Reporting: Enables detailed security analysis, though customization is limited.
Efficient Resource Usage: Provides stable performance across platforms with minimal impact.
Proactive Scanning: Ensures threats are detected early, enhancing security measures.

In industries like academia and IT consulting, Symantec Endpoint Security fulfills specific needs for robust endpoint protection. Its centralized management and application control make it suitable for educational institutions managing large network systems, while service providers benefit from its flexible deployment options.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Arkoon, Netasq

Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Stormshield Endpoint Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.