TestingWhiz vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Cygnet.One and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Cygnet.One is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.0, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Cygnet.One holds a 0.6% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cygnet.One users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

TestingWhiz

Read 1 TestingWhiz review

369 Views
292 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,615 Views
10,424 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

TestingWhiz

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and TestingWhiz are competing automation tools. Tricentis Tosca holds an advantage with enterprise-grade features, while TestingWhiz is preferred for cost-effectiveness and user-friendly interface.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers model-based test automation, continuous testing, and extensive support for a broad range of technologies. TestingWhiz provides a codeless test automation platform, seamless integration with CI/CD tools, and accessibility for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca provides a comprehensive deployment approach with strong technical support suitable for large-scale operations. TestingWhiz appeals with its quicker and simpler deployment process, particularly for small to mid-sized companies, along with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca has a higher initial setup cost, compensating with long-term value for complex needs. TestingWhiz is more affordable and offers rapid ROI through lower costs and efficient deployment, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TestingWhiz

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of TestingWhiz is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 12.9%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	12.9%
TestingWhiz	0.6%
Other	86.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay-Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at Opus Technologies

Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

"I am impressed with the product's script test."

"Tosca is a low-code no-code automation tool, allowing direct automation and reusability of test cases."

"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."

"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."

"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."

"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the ease of use, you do not need to program if you do not want to."

"We like the fact that it works across mobile, desktop, web, and APIs. Due to this, the solution has a broad range of applications."

"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

"More and more artificial intelligence (AI) is coming in. So, some amount of AI to create natural language processing (NLP)-based test cases and manage defects would be very helpful. This is because the technologies have evolved in the last five to six months, so there is a potential opportunity there."

"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."

"The initial setup was complex."

"We faced some hardships in implementing the solution because of integration."

"Their license management should be improved. One of our customers is a global customer. They want to use one licensed server and then split the licenses based on the different users of the different business units, but currently, there is only one license server that everybody can access. There is no control, and that's why sometimes congestion can happen."

"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."

"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."

"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive solution and there is an annual license required. The whole licensing process is confusing and it could be made easier."

"I am satisfied with the cost."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"There is an annual cost for Tricentis."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?

It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?

Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs TestingWhiz

Compared 39% of the time

Selenium HQ vs TestingWhiz

Compared 35% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs TestingWhiz

Compared 26% of the time

More TestingWhiz Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download TestingWhiz product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Cygnet.One

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, BrowserStack, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.