No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ThreatSync NDR vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ThreatSync NDR
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
18th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (55th)
Trellix Network Detection a...
Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of ThreatSync NDR is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Network Detection and Response is 2.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Detection and Response (NDR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Network Detection and Response2.9%
ThreatSync NDR1.0%
Other96.1%
Network Detection and Response (NDR)
 

Featured Reviews

RickyMakkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Security Consultant at NTT DATA
Unified monitoring has improved hybrid visibility and automates threat detection across our network
There are definitely areas for improvements in ThreatSync NDR, as no product is perfect. Its effectiveness depends on proper network visibility, so if important traffic segments are not mirrored or monitored, detection may be incomplete. Regarding improvements needed, ThreatSync NDR can definitely work on the user interface because it is currently a bit complex, and security teams sometimes find it unfamiliar with the behavioral analytics. If they can make it more user-friendly, that would help. Regarding ThreatSync NDR's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are not fully enabled. While AI-assisted threat detections are there, it still requires significant improvements. However, the positive aspect is that it has significantly reduced the manual tasks and work of the security personnel.
Twinkle Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations
Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Implementing ThreatSync+ NDR has influenced our business significantly as it provides enhanced security and saves several hours daily by eliminating manual log reviews."
"ThreatSync NDR is a strong addition to our company's security architecture."
"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."
"I would definitely recommend this product because I have seen many cases where other solutions were not able to catch malware, but FireEye raised a red flag."
"The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams."
"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."
"The most valuable feature is the network security module."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted our organization by making our security team more confident and responsible, knowing that the network is being watched all the time, allowing us to respond to threats much faster than we used to."
"The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive."
"Overall, security operations are approximately 30 to 40 percent more efficient, and we can save time because everything automatically analyzes, resulting in approximately 40 to 50 percent time savings."
 

Cons

"After using ThreatSync+ NDR for about a year, areas for improvement include the ability to pull logs from other vendors using an API."
"There are definitely areas for improvements in ThreatSync NDR, as no product is perfect. Its effectiveness depends on proper network visibility, so if important traffic segments are not mirrored or monitored, detection may be incomplete."
"It is an expensive solution."
"I think the UI of Trellix Network Detection and Response can be improved for a first-time user."
"I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it somewhere else."
"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."
"Without tuning, you may get many false positives."
"Stability is fine as long as we don't go deeper into the system. Once we go deeper into the SSM, inspection, and decryption, we get some issues."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response is a powerful tool with areas that need improvement, such as dashboard customization options and reporting flexibility."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"It's an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
19%
Construction Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
12%
University
5%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ThreatSync+ NDR?
There are definitely areas for improvements in ThreatSync NDR, as no product is perfect. Its effectiveness depends on proper network visibility, so if important traffic segments are not mirrored or...
What is your primary use case for ThreatSync+ NDR?
I use ThreatSync NDR for monitoring across our hybrid and cloud infrastructure. For monitoring in our hybrid and cloud infrastructure using ThreatSync NDR, we investigate indicators such as IP addr...
What advice do you have for others considering ThreatSync+ NDR?
If I am evaluating an NDR solution for medium to large enterprises, especially with our experience using it with our WatchGuard security products, ThreatSync NDR delivers strong visibility, intelli...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is positive, as the setup process was straightforward, licensing was flexible, and the value deliver...
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
Based on my experience with the solution, I do not see any improvements needed for Trellix Network Detection and Response at present; it might be required in the future, but there is no space to im...
What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
Our main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is to maintain oversight of our network traffic and catch any threats or unusual activity as early as possible. Trellix Network Detectio...
 

Also Known As

No data available
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatSync NDR vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.