Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Corero Logo

Top 10 Corero Alternatives

Vendor: Corero
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Corero Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Corero based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Cloudflare One, and Imperva Application Security Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Corero Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Corero, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Corero Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Corero Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare appeals to businesses with budget constraints due to its competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Corero, with its advanced threat detection capabilities, attracts organizations seeking enhanced security features. Cloudflare's scalability contrasts with Corero's detailed threat intelligence and analytics.
Download Cloudflare vs. Corero Report
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost with minimal initial investment, while Corero presents a more complex setup process that may involve higher initial costs, highlighting a substantial difference in the ease and expense of getting started.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost with minimal initial investment, while Corero presents a more complex setup process that may involve higher initial costs, highlighting a substantial difference in the ease and expense of getting started.
Corero Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Corero Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Corero provides specialized DDoS protection and personalized support, appealing to businesses seeking low-cost solutions. In comparison, Cloudflare One offers a comprehensive security suite with integration capabilities, attracting companies prioritizing robust protection and scalability despite higher costs.
Download Cloudflare One vs. Corero Report
Corero's setup cost is higher, focusing on specialized security features, while Cloudflare One offers a more accessible setup cost, appealing to businesses needing scalable network security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero's setup cost is higher, focusing on specialized security features, while Cloudflare One offers a more accessible setup cost, appealing to businesses needing scalable network security solutions.
Corero Logo
Corero Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform
4.3 out of 5
Imperva Application Security Platform excels in comprehensive application security with features like a web application firewall and flexible API security. In comparison, Corero is renowned for exceptional DDoS protection with real-time mitigation, appealing to organizations focusing on DDoS threats.
Download Corero vs. Imperva Application Security Platform Report
Imperva Application Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Corero, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Application Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Corero, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Corero Logo
Arbor DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Corero Logo
Arbor DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Arbor DDoS is preferred for its comprehensive threat intelligence and network coverage appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Corero offers real-time visibility and protection, suiting organizations needing prompt response and cost-effective solutions with detailed traffic analysis and efficient customer service.
Download Arbor DDoS vs. Corero Report
Arbor DDoS has higher setup costs compared to Corero, providing extensive protection features, while Corero offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
Arbor DDoS has higher setup costs compared to Corero, providing extensive protection features, while Corero offers a more cost-effective setup with streamlined functionality.
Corero Logo
Radware DDoS
4.4 out of 5
Corero Logo
Radware DDoS
4.4 out of 5
Corero impresses with real-time visibility, seamless infrastructure integration, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to organizations seeking quick returns and ease of deployment. In comparison, Radware DDoS offers advanced protection, versatility, and long-term value, ideal for complex environments requiring robust features and comprehensive support.
Download Corero vs. Radware DDoS Report
Corero offers a straightforward setup cost, while Radware DDoS requires a higher initial investment. The difference in setup expenses highlights a key consideration for businesses evaluating both DDoS protection solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero offers a straightforward setup cost, while Radware DDoS requires a higher initial investment. The difference in setup expenses highlights a key consideration for businesses evaluating both DDoS protection solutions.
Corero Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Corero Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Corero provides affordability and strong support with features like real-time DDoS protection. In comparison, Kentik offers comprehensive features, focusing on network visibility and analytics. Corero's ease of deployment suits security-focused buyers, while Kentik appeals to those prioritizing extensive data analysis capabilities.
Download Corero vs. Kentik Report
Corero requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Kentik offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction highlights Corero's focus on more extensive network protection compared to Kentik's accessible entry-level solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Kentik offers a more budget-friendly setup. This pricing distinction highlights Corero's focus on more extensive network protection compared to Kentik's accessible entry-level solution.
Corero Logo
Fortinet FortiDDoS
4.1 out of 5
Corero Logo
Fortinet FortiDDoS
4.1 out of 5
Corero attracts due to precise attack mitigation, real-time dashboards, streamlined deployment, and responsive support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiDDoS appeals with extensive threat intelligence, advanced automation, and long-term ROI, despite its intricate setup and higher cost, offering comprehensive protection for its investment.
Download Corero vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS Report
Corero's setup cost is generally rated as high by users, while Fortinet FortiDDoS often receives feedback highlighting its more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero's setup cost is generally rated as high by users, while Fortinet FortiDDoS often receives feedback highlighting its more affordable initial setup.
Corero Logo
Link11
4.4 out of 5
Corero Logo
Link11
4.4 out of 5
Corero offers better pricing and customer support, focusing on DDoS protection suited for quick deployment. In comparison, Link11 requires more intricate setup but provides advanced features like automated attack mitigation, making it appealing for businesses investing in comprehensive threat coverage and adaptability.
Download Corero vs. Link11 Report
Corero's setup cost is initially higher, offering an advanced protection framework, while Link11 provides a lower cost option, focusing on ease of access and rapid deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero's setup cost is initially higher, offering an advanced protection framework, while Link11 provides a lower cost option, focusing on ease of access and rapid deployment.
Corero Logo
Corero Logo
Nexusguard DDoS Protection
4.7 out of 5
Corero excels in real-time analysis ideal for enterprises seeking in-depth insights. In comparison, Nexusguard's cloud-based solution appeals with quick scalability. Corero is preferred for precise analytics on large networks, while Nexusguard is attractive for its flexibility and seamless cloud integration.
Download Corero vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection Report
Corero has a straightforward setup cost, while Nexusguard presents a flexible fee structure. This key difference in pricing approach might influence the choice between Corero and Nexusguard DDoS Protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Corero has a straightforward setup cost, while Nexusguard presents a flexible fee structure. This key difference in pricing approach might influence the choice between Corero and Nexusguard DDoS Protection.
Corero Logo
A10 Thunder TPS
4.3 out of 5
Corero Logo
A10 Thunder TPS
4.3 out of 5
A10 Thunder TPS offers robust scalability and seamless infrastructure integration, appealing to large organizations. In comparison, Corero provides excellent threat detection accuracy, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing advanced security. Tech buyers may choose A10 for cost efficiency or Corero for in-depth protection.
Download A10 Thunder TPS vs. Corero Report
A10 Thunder TPS has a more cost-effective setup compared to Corero's higher initial investment, highlighting a clear pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
A10 Thunder TPS has a more cost-effective setup compared to Corero's higher initial investment, highlighting a clear pricing difference.
Corero Logo
Corero Logo
Cisco Secure DDoS Protection
1 out of 5
Cisco Secure DDoS Protection effectively mitigates DDoS attacks, offering valuable features such as real-time threat intelligence and advanced analytics. Users appreciate its robust performance but suggest improvements in reporting capabilities and integration with other security tools to enhance user experience.
View comparison
Corero Logo
RioRey
1 out of 5
Corero Logo
RioRey
1 out of 5

RioRey is a leader in building some of the best performing DDoS defense systems for automatically detecting and mitigating DDoS attacks. Installed all over the world, RioRey solutions are highly intelligent and analytic-driven, and are designed for networks of all sizes and meet the most rigorous security requirements of major enterprises, large service providers and Telco environments. 

View comparison

Related categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
CDN
Managed DNS