Couchbase Reviews

Investing in Couchbase led to reduced operational costs and enhanced speed-to-market. Companies eliminated the need for Redis, cutting costs and maintaining productivity during peak hours with increased throughput and user volume.

Enterprise buyers considering Couchbase can expect various payment options, including monthly, quarterly, or annual licenses, with costs ranging from 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year. Some users find the commercial version more advantageous than competitors, although others consider it expensive. Couchbase's open source version faces deployment issues, leading many towards enterprise licenses. It's more affordable than some competitors like Redis, but additional integration costs may arise, particularly when dealing with third-party solutions like CData.

• "It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."
• "The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."
• "I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

Organizations utilize Couchbase for diverse purposes such as data logging and backend merging, supporting e-commerce applications, and enhancing telemedical and automation industries. They manage configuration data platforms, build property listing systems, and support retail domain applications. Couchbase aids gaming industry data handling, persistent caching, and document-based storage for retail information. Users migrate to Couchbase Capella for cost-effective cloud hosting with autoscaling and SQL++ language, while others use its NoSQL database for high-performance reads and writes.

Couchbase support is generally responsive and helpful, though some users rarely contact them, opting for self-resolution. Larger organizations report varying responsiveness, sometimes requiring persistence to gain focus on issues. Many find customer service satisfactory, with ratings ranging from 7 to 10 out of 10. Some mention well-written documentation as a useful resource. There are notes for improvement in providing project-specific solutions and quicker root cause analysis, while others emphasize helpful assistance with technical configurations.

Couchbase's initial setup varies in complexity. Some find it straightforward, even quick, especially with tools like Docker. Challenges include schema design and tuning for stable production environments. While easy on Windows, some new users face difficulties due to scarce documentation. Deployment time ranges from minutes to a few days, with cloud and local setups differing. Capella offers faster setups, while Kubernetes or VM setups take longer. Stability and rebalance are critical for optimal performance.

Users believe Couchbase is highly adaptable, managing massive data volumes and accommodating growth effectively when data structures are optimized. Some perceive technical complexity in node management but appreciate its capacity to handle high throughput. Its expansion potential appears positive, especially with flexible configurations in Couchbase Capella. Instances of Couchbase have been successfully integrated across enterprises, highlighting its robust scaling features while ensuring performance and operational efficiency.

Couchbase exhibits strong stability, with most users acknowledging its reliability. Instances of downtime are minimal, and its performance remains consistent. Some users mention it operating 24/7 without issues, even during node failures. Stability ratings vary, ranging from six to nine out of ten, depending on deployment environments. While some bugs have been reported, they are being addressed in upcoming versions. Index creation and edge cases require attention, but no major stability issues are noted.