CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Reviews

The main use of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is to manage identities and access for our clients. We mainly focus on use cases like managing shared accounts, automatic password rotation, and recording sessions.

Its quite difficult to track for client who has access and at what time, which activity was done with that account, especially for built-in administrator accounts and Shared accounts. 

Automatic password rotation is another use case. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has the capability to rotate automatic passwords in the defined period of time. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is also used for recording and session monitoring .

With CyberArk DNA, we can discover the accounts and their associated dependencies and usage.

Data is secure. The passwords are stored in an encrypted format. The data privacy is very high, and it is quite challenging for someone to retrieve credentials from CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

With Privileged Threat Analytics (PTA), which is a different component in CyberArk, you can put some additional control. For example, you have an account onboarded on CyberArk. If someone wants to access the system without using CyberArk and copying a password, which they might have stored in the notepad or their system, an alert gets triggered. There is also an additional control for ad hoc admin access if someone wants to access an admin privilege or and want to access some critical application after business hours. PTA provides more control.

It improves the overall security posture and provides more control. We have better governance. Credentials are stored in the safe vault.

It reduces the need for IT and help desk resources. There is a streamlined change process without relying on the L1 team to reset the admin account credentials. There is also better compliance and segregation of duties. We can meet the compliance requirement for retention of logs, password rotations, etc. It helps client to meet different compliance requirement / standards, such as HIPAA, SOX, ISO 27001, etc.

With no manual intervention, there is also a reduction in human errors. Based on the number of available accounts for the organization and the user entitlement, that is 300 to 400 hours.

It improves operational efficiency. With the control that we have with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, there is a reduction in the manual effort for validation of the admin accounts. Without it, a person has to extract the accounts from the servers and revalidate them with the owners or approvers. That is quite tricky.

It can help to reduce the number of privileged accounts. For example, if the Windows team has 10 or 15 members with individual accounts. It is better to create one shared account based on their role such as L1, L2, or L3, reducing it to 2 accounts. It will reduce the number of privileged accounts in the organization as well as threats.

The main feature of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the ability to manage who has access to what and when, especially with shared accounts. With individual accounts, that is easy, but with shared accounts, it is quite challenging for clients.

The sessions are being monitored based on the Safe design and the ownership of a respective Safe. And its maintain individual accountability, Also check-in and check-out the passwords.

The reporting should be improved.  There should be more customization. The report should show how we are going to mitigate the risk because we cannot show the system environment to each and every auditor. Some kind of custom report should be there so that we can give a clear output about the risk.

There should be improvements in the dashboard visibility within CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. It should give more visibility in a single go rather than having to compare different reports.

Furthermore, having out-of-the-box dependency discovery for accounts, such as scheduled tasks , services and application pools, would be beneficial to improve overall functionality.

I have a total of 16 years of experience, and I have been working with CyberArk for about twelve to thirteen years. 

There have been no stability or performance issues as long as the design meets the requirements. It is essential to adhere to the recommendations for concurrent session capacities.

The solution is quite stable and scalable. It does not seem to have any gaps.

The technical support from CyberArk is quite impressive. They are responsive and provide detailed information when needed. I would rate them a nine out of ten because sometimes there are delays due to different reasons or misunderstandings.

Positive

I have worked in CyberArk, Delinea, CA PAM, ARCON, and BeyondTrust. I am parallelly working on other PAM tools along with CyberArk. I started to work in CyberArk PAM since version 7.1.

For on-premises, there is complexity due to the need for physical servers and cluster configuration, which might require going to data centers. However, after several deployments, it becomes less challenging. A cloud deployment would be easier.

Its integration capabilities are quite good. We are using CyberArk identity as a multifactor authentication with RADIUS. That is quite impressive because, with one dashboard, we can manage the users' identities.

In terms of the deployment strategy, we first identify the scale and then design the solution. If the number of admins is high, there will be more concurrent sessions and recordings.

It is not tough to maintain. We once had an issue because of human error, but overall, it is easy. For 8X5 support, five members should be there.

For a large-scale deployment, two to three people are sufficient.

The cost savings vary based on the organization. A larger organization will definitely have more cost savings with the reduction in the manual effort in managing the accounts in the system.

The pricing is slightly higher compared to other solutions, but it is reasonable because there are better security features. Initially, it was based on endpoints, now it is based on the number of users, which offers cost savings based on administrative accounts.

I would recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. My recommendation would be to ensure that the benefits of the solution are highlighted by presales, such as risk mitigation and meeting compliance posture.

The overall rating for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ten out of ten.

The primary use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is within the IT security industry. It manages privileged access and generates reports, particularly for clients in sectors like finance. The system facilitates account management, enables the generation of on-demand reports, and helps maintain security protocols for these clients.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has enhanced my organizational capabilities by providing important security reporting features.

The most valuable features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager include its search capabilities. Searching was previously a challenge, especially with Windows servers. When searching, we could only search based on the account name itself, as the system couldn't identify which accounts had access to which systems. This functionality caught my attention. Another standout feature is CyberArk Compass, which is planned for an upcoming release or has potentially already been released for Prisma Cloud. Finally, managing user accounts through the PWA is quite helpful. When a user is suspended, we can activate the account using the PWA instead of the private client.

The ability to manage user accounts and suspend them with ease through Password Vault Web Access rather than a client is a significant feature.

I like the integration with tools like Compass and the ability to search based on account names and systems.

My concern and area for improvement revolves around reporting. I even submitted an enhancement request to CyberArk Software, suggesting that they include a dedicated dashboard page within either Privileged Cloud or their self-hosted PAM solution. This dashboard could feature visual elements like pie charts to display metrics such as account compliance percentages. For example, it could show PTA alerts to visualize security events occurring within a month, quarter, or year. Having such a feature would allow for on-the-spot report generation. Currently, we rely on the REST API to invoke and pull the necessary information. We then have to manually copy the data, convert it from JSON to Excel, and generate the desired report and dashboard. This process is time-consuming and sometimes leads to inconsistencies in the information provided.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for six years.

The stability of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is generally good. Minor issues may arise, but they are typically manageable and not major. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

My deployment of CyberArk is scalable, although the scalability differs depending on whether it's on-premises or cloud.

Customer support is somewhat lacking. They are often unavailable on Fridays, and the support process, such as raising a call or case, can take too long. On a scale of zero to ten, I would rate their support as six out of ten.

Neutral

Before using CyberArk, I interacted with BeyondTrust. BeyondTrust features, such as their reporting simplicity, made it easier for me to generate reports. The switch was primarily motivated by cost considerations.

The initial setup was detailed and required steps to ensure security measures were aligned with standards. Efficient sequencing, working with redundancy, and cooperation with load-balancing teams were crucial parts of the process.

The deployment took one week to complete because of the redundancy.

The solution is expensive but not excessively so. Discussions with clients have revealed that costs, especially for Privileged Cloud, are a concern. Improved support could enhance the solution's overall value.

I would rate the cost of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager seven out of ten with ten being the most expensive.

I would recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager because it is a leading solution for privileged access management. Although it has room for improvement, particularly in areas like reporting and support, it remains a solid option. I rate it an eight out of ten.

We have deployed CyberArk Privileged Access Manager using various configurations. For instance, active components are located in one location, while passive components reside in another. This is determined by the route to the virtual machine, as the components operate as virtual machines. The primary vault is situated in a separate location, and the disaster recovery vault is placed in another distinct location. Currently, we have a PAM license for 800 users, but we are utilizing it for 650 users.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager maintenance addresses security bulletins and involves several key steps. We ensure the admin utilizes the security bulletin during maintenance, which begins with raising a change request. Before the change is approved and implemented in production, it is thoroughly tested in a test environment to verify its functionality. Deployment to production follows successful testing. Application-specific maintenance for CyberArk follows the product roadmap, ensuring we remain at most one version behind the latest release. We also promptly apply necessary security patches from security bulletins. Furthermore, from an OS perspective, we maintain alignment with the latest Microsoft patches, ensuring all systems are up-to-date and secure.

I use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for privileged access management for our IT administrative team. It helps in managing access to IT systems.

By implementing this solution, we wanted to monitor and manage access. We wanted to control who can log into which machine.

Our administrators no longer have to save the passwords or credentials in a file or spreadsheet to share with colleagues. Everything is organized in a vault. We have logs on which credentials were used and at what time on a machine.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is very powerful and customizable. We are able to customize it as per our needs. 

It has been stable over the last four years, and we have a good overview of the usage of every credential on hosts and endpoints. Our infrastructure consists of many solutions and pieces, and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is one of the important pieces. 

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has not helped us reduce the number of privileged accounts, but it certainly helps us manage our privileged accounts. Without it, it would not be possible to manage them.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager assists us in meeting compliance and regulatory requirements from the government, the European Central Bank, and our customers. It is hard to measure the time saved on satisfying compliance requirements related to financial services by implementing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, but without it, it would not be possible for us to meet these requirements.

The most valuable features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager are its robust functionality and reliability. 

It has reduced the mean time to respond, but it is hard to provide any metrics. Its log and audit files are very helpful when we have to investigate an incident.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager helps ensure data privacy because we now know who is using which credentials and at what time.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager did not have much effect on our operational efficiency because it is a new tool for us. Any new tool means more work. It has also not saved us costs, but without it, we would not be able to meet the requirements for operating our bank.

We were able to realize its benefits immediately after the deployment.

The graphical user interface could be simplified and harmonized for better usability. It should be consistent. Its GUI is very confusing.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for four years.

Overall, the stability of the solution is high. I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

Currently, it meets my organization's capacity requirements. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

We have about 6,000 employees at different locations. We have different operating systems, database systems, and decentralized infrastructure.

Their technical support is good, but it can be better. Even if we provide everything required along with the ticket, we get a standard response asking for the logs. They do not go into analyzing the issue. They just ask for the log files. I would rate their support a six out of ten.

Neutral

We did not use any solution before CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. This is the first solution we are using for Privileged Access Management.

Its implementation took us a year because we have a complicated infrastructure. It requires support from a consultant or an implementation partner. You cannot install it yourself. The automatic onboarding of the privileged accounts is a lot of work.

It requires maintenance because if your infrastructure changes, you have to take care of all the new credentials. If you also have a cloud setup, you need to figure out how to connect everything. There is a lot of work involved in maintaining it. It is not easy.

We took the help of a third party for deployment and customization.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is on the expensive side.

I would recommend CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to other users. It is one of the leaders in Gartner's Quadrant. It is stable. 

My overall rating for the solution is an eight out of ten.

We use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for privileged access management (PAM) escalation, securing our website, and applications. Our cybersecurity team actively utilizes its features.

The PAM escalation is valued. The access control feature and privilege and role-based assignment are outstanding. Dividing the user admin for security protection is the best feature. Additionally, its remote access allows easy connection for my team, and it efficiently manages identity.

Initially, it was challenging to understand and use all the features incrementally. Having a better user journey with a support team to connect would improve the product and services.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for about eight months in our company.

The solution is quite stable. We have not faced any issues related to stability since using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for eight months.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is scalable. As a startup, it initially handled fewer users, but it scaled well as we grew.

Technical support was fast in its replies and always supportive, helping to resolve any issues efficiently.

Neutral

We used miniOrange, an Indian-based cybersecurity product for access management and PAM escalation. We also used one more product, which I don't remember the name of.

The initial setup was straightforward due to well-documented resources and tutorials.

Our cybersecurity team, comprising two to three people, worked on the deployment and feature implementation.

The pricing is quite well-structured with monthly and weekly plans.

I evaluated miniOrange and one other product.

New users should watch the YouTube channel, read the documentation, check the resource section including CyberArk University, and see if it works well with their product. I rate the overall solution a nine. My overall product rating is 9 out of 10.

We have traditional use cases for Windows, Unix, and Linux-based systems. Additionally, we have use cases involving AWS, Oracle, SQL, and Postgres databases.

We also plan to bring in more use cases for VMware vCenter, VMware VxRail, and iDRAC. We aim for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager to be an integral part of all our infrastructures in accessing and securing credentials, particularly in restricted environments. It is a life science project. There are certain places restricted for the users.

We are still trying to get everything driven through CyberArk. We are trying to restrict direct RDPs to a particular target or doing an SSH outside of CyberArk. The adaptability is about 60% at this time, but we want to make it 100%.

Authentication is the key to protecting sensitive data. Integration with SAML or Okta prevents intrusions to a great extent.

We were able to realize its benefits immediately after the deployment, and we are happy with it.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has not helped reduce the number of privileged accounts, but they all are being vaulted now. We do not have any privileged accounts that are not vaulted in CyberArk.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager’s ability to safeguard credentials is very important. The paradigms are changing. The data is at threat when it is online. Anything digital needs to be secured. CyberArk has been the leader in the PAM product market. Our client made a good decision by taking CyberArk as their PAM tool.

The features that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager provides are good. It helps to meet the compliance and regulatory requirements to a large extent.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has helped to improve the incident response mean times. We have notifications configured from CyberArk. We have integrated CyberArk with ServiceNow and Splunk SIEM. We get notified pretty easily. The notification part works very well with CyberArk. There is about 85% improvement.

One of the best features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is the capability of Privileged Session Manager (PSM) because it provides visibility into user activities, audit ability, and traceability. 

The integration with most other technologies is also excellent. We expect more plug-ins, but it already includes plug-ins for password management with other technologies, offering a robust mechanism for credential safety and management.

One area for improvement is the plug-in development challenge. Although CyberArk provides a plug-in generator utility, it does not fully meet our needs, particularly for web-based applications. The plug-in generator currently works only for Telnet and SSH connections. We cannot generate a plug-in for web-based applications.

Moreover, integration with ServiceNow ticketing supports change requests or incidents but lacks support for service requests. Introducing service request support could prevent the overhead of raising unnecessary incidents or changes. There have been a lot of votes for this feature, but I am not sure why CyberArk has not yet introduced it. This is one of the features that we have been waiting for.

I have used CyberArk for over six years, and the client I am working with has been using it for over four years.

I would rate its stability an eight out of ten. There are occasional bugs where while installing the product, it behaves differently on different servers, especially during patch upgrades. Such issues have been more noticeable since we moved from version 12.6 to higher versions. This could be because they have done a lot of UI changes and enhancements in these versions.

Scalability is good, and I would rate it around an eight out of ten.

They are fast. In some cases, they typically respond within one to two days. However, the response time can vary depending on the priority and volume of cases they receive.

Neutral

We previously used BeyondTrust but are transitioning everything to CyberArk, as it offers better integration and enhancements.

The initial setup is easy. I was not part of the organization during the initial setup phase. It probably took around six months.

There are other vendors that handle the maintenance for us. CyberArk comes into the picture if issues are not resolved by our vendors.

The pricing for CyberArk is on the higher side compared to other Privileged Access Management products. Something should be done regarding enterprise licensing for long-standing customers.

I would advise trying CyberArk as it offers a wide range of integrations, plug-ins, and enhancements compared to other solutions. However, it is expensive.

Overall, I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager an eight out of ten.

My main use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is installing it to prevent direct access to the users. For the privileged account, we are using the PAM, and all sessions have been monitored, with all logs shared and logged on the vault.

I have more to add about my main use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, specifically our Privileged Threat Analysis, which detects any suspicious event and alarms us.

The best features CyberArk Privileged Access Manager offers are PTA, Privileged Threat Analysis, and Alero, Remote Access Management, and these features are essential for enhancing security.

PTA and Alero have made a difference for my team by providing a predefined rule assigned and implemented on the PAM; for example, it sends us an email if there is any suspicious activity or threat credential loss, offering feedback related to user behavior. For Alero, Remote Access Management, it is a very wonderful Identity and Access Management with biometric MFA, mobile access, location tracking, and a small RBAC role-based matrix access that defines user roles, serving as a replacement for VPN.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has positively impacted my organization, showing significant improvement since all sessions are monitored and isolated using isolated RDP sessions, which are created temporarily and expire if not used.

In terms of specific metrics or outcomes, the time savings have been noticeable, and while it is not direct access, the PAM works efficiently between servers and end users, preventing users from running or installing unauthorized applications through the AppLocker application created on the PSM.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager can be improved because I have experienced one issue where a user connected through RDP to a Linux server and the PAM could not fetch any commands or key store logging from the Linux server, which works fine on Windows servers. If they could combine both into one keylogger solution, it would be great, and increasing the number of CPM plugins for password retention while providing common web portal applications out-of-the-box would also help.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for more than five years.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable in my experience, with no issues of downtime or reliability due to our disaster recovery (DR) and high availability (HA) servers in place.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's scalability is good, as it can handle more users or workloads with our five-year roadmap indicating that the PSM server can manage around 20 sessions per hour, which is sufficient for our organization.

I would rate customer support a nine on a scale.

I previously used BeyondTrust and Delinea, but I did not switch because I noticed many features in CyberArk that are not available in other solutions.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, as I had good experience with another live product.

My advice for others looking to use CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is to pay attention to the vaulting part, which is essential for every organization, as each server has a secured vault that connects over TLS with a lot of encryption details. The product is consistently enhanced, and the latest release is 14.6. I rate this solution 9 out of 10.

I am a senior manager, and we have multiple clients for whom we deploy CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. We also manage or upgrade their instances. We handle migrations and new implementations. We take care of anything related to CyberArk.

The feature that I like the most is the Privileged Session Manager. It offers session recordings, logging, and tracking of user workstreams. It keeps a record of activities, allowing me to easily fetch screen recordings to detect any misuse and see who did what and what happened. Its benefits can be seen immediately after the deployment.

Based on the user experience that I see on a day-to-day basis, some changes could be made to the Privileged Session Manager tool to make it more user-friendly. The user interface of that tool could be more advanced and understandable to laymen, rather than being more of a developer tool. I would recommend more user-friendliness there.

CyberArk is more focused on the cloud solution. They are not going towards on-prem, but a lot of clients still like the on-prem solution. With the cloud implementation, you have a lot of dependencies on expert services. When you get into some issues, you have to wait for expert services. They usually reply in two to three days. That is something CyberArk needs to make better. If they want clients to move to the cloud, they need to support them in real-time. The client should not be waiting for two days to get a response for the issue. If CyberArk wants people to pay for cloud services, they need to make the cloud services much more real-time.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for approximately six years.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a stable solution. I have never faced any issues with stability.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a scalable solution.

I have contacted their support a lot of times. The quality of support is okay, but the time frame for replies should be much faster than it is currently.

Neutral

I have not used any similar solution for PAM. However, for managing the accounts, we have used some password management solutions such as 1Password, but they do not give you the accessibility and different components that PAM provides. They are just for password storage and keeping the passwords safe. A PAM solution from CyberArk or BeyondTrust solution provides a lot more than that, so we cannot compare them. There is no comparison.

I have deployed it both on the cloud and on-prem. My one client is on-prem, and another one is on the cloud.

The initial deployment depends on how extensive it is. For one client, it was quite easy, but after the deployment, it was tricky to deploy the components for AEM, EP, and CCP. On-prem implementation is much easier than the cloud. Cloud solutions require better and more immediate support. Cloud deployment is challenging due to dependencies on expert services.

It requires a bit of maintenance but not that much. Once you deploy the solution, it works, but there are always new upgrades. For example, if you deploy a web connector for web applications and Chrome releases an upgrade, you have to see whether CyberArk is supporting that upgrade or not. Accordingly, you have to update the drivers and other things for the web applications. The same goes with PSMP and SMP. If there are any version upgrades or any vulnerability patch fixes, you have to perform maintenance.

We help customers deploy it.

The duration depends on how big the instance is. To deploy all the components, the duration can range from three to six months.

It can be deployed by one person, but it also depends on how many instances of servers you are deploying, what is the concurrent usage, how many users are being onboarded, and what components you have. There is PSM. There is EPM and PSMP. It depends on what exactly the client requires. These are some factors that determine the time frame and number of people required.

From a client perspective, CyberArk's pricing is fair but there is a significant increase each year. They should limit the price increase because this could potentially drive customers to other partners. Price changes should be at defined intervals. There should not be sudden jumps.

I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager an eight out of ten.

My primary use case for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is managing privileged access across the organization. I focus on auditing compliance and ensuring compliance with financial systems like SAP.

The benefits of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager are typically realized over time, often facing initial resistance from various teams within an organization. While security, audit, and governance teams readily recognize the value of CyberArk, platform teams, and other stakeholders may resist its implementation. This necessitates a concerted effort to sell CyberArk internally, emphasizing its benefits and addressing concerns. Convincing internal stakeholders can be more challenging than securing buy-in from security or IT teams, often requiring three to six months after deployment for the benefits to become evident and widely accepted.

For me, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's most valuable features are password and session management. It also includes technologies like Zero Standing Privileges and EPM, which I deploy for customers to demonstrate the return on investment.

CyberArk could enhance its usability by simplifying its architecture and design. Additionally, incorporating automated onboarding and offboarding features directly into the product would reduce the maintenance burden on administrators.

I have been using CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for eight years.

I find CyberArk to be quite stable. Exceptions occur mostly due to user errors. It has a large customer base and positive feedback within my network.

On-premises scalability is challenging for me due to deploying various components on different servers, but I find SaaS to be more promising in scalability.

In my experience, the quality of support has been inconsistent. Response times seem to correlate with the strength of the relationship with the CyberArk account manager, with quicker responses when rapport is strong.

Neutral

I worked briefly with BeyondTrust but returned to CyberArk, which has been my primary focus.

In SaaS, most tasks are abstracted, reducing the workload compared to on-premise solutions where tasks like network configuration, connectivity, SSL certificates, and management fall on the user. However, SaaS solution eliminate the overhead of building VMs and similar infrastructure. Overall effort for both approaches is comparable, but SaaS offers the significant advantage of CyberArk managing the underlying infrastructure, including the vault and web interface, a feature most customers prefer today.

Initial setups were challenging for me at first, but with experience, they became more manageable. It generally requires reviewing documentation and seeking initial support from CyberArk. The deployments take between three and six months.

Implementation involves a project team with a project manager and Windows engineers for tasks like VM provisioning. Typically, I have executed projects primarily by myself, sometimes with minimal assistance from junior resources.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is more expensive than its competitors, such as BeyondTrust, Delinea, and ManageEngine PAM360. While ManageEngine PAM360 offers similar flexibility and support at a lower cost, CyberArk's SaaS solution is particularly expensive. This high price point has discouraged many customers from migrating from on-premise solutions to the CyberArk SaaS platform.

I would rate CyberArk Privileged Access Manager nine out of ten.

CyberArk manages the maintenance for the Privileged Access Manager.

Organizations must ensure users understand the importance of PAM and how it secures infrastructure. Training sessions, workshops, and demos are crucial for building user engagement and overcoming initial resistance.