Darktrace Reviews

The tool offers us visibility into network traffic. 

The tool gives us alerts whenever an admin is trying to connect.

I am impressed with the product's ability to give insights into network traffic. 

I would like to see a feature where the tool ingests information from an anti-malware product that is present at the endpoint. 

I am using the product since September. 

The solution is stable. 

The tool's deployment is easy. 

The tool's pricing is costly. 

I would rate the tool a nine out of ten. You need to use the tool on a trial basis so that you can get comfortable with it. 

We are a consulting company and sell Darktrace to our customers. Our company is in West Africa. I'm the company CEO.

Darktrace can observe networks and respond to those observations. It provides great network protection, is innovative and flexible.

I think Darktrace needs to improve its collaboration with local partners. That would include training and improving the technical skills of vendors. Desktop and mobile device protection could also be improved. 

We've been selling this solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

Our customers report that the technical support is very good. 

Positive

The initial setup is reasonably straightforward although the process requires some preparation beforehand. The size of deployment varies greatly, we've deployed in companies ranging in size from 200 up to 5,000 users. 

Licensing costs are expensive, although I think the high cost is partly a currency issue because we're based in West Africa. 

I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

The most valuable feature is the solution's ability to trim out the false positives and point your attention to the real important stuff.

The level of tracking within the network from the transmission level up to the machine level can use improvement.

The solution works similarly to an intrusion prevention system at the network level. It would be a nice improvement to have an add-on that can act at the post level.

The cost of the solution can be reduced to make it more appealing to customers.

I have been using the solution for two and a half years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable but costly to do.

The customer support team is responsive and tries to resolve the issue proactively.

The setup is straightforward and easy to integrate.

The setup cost for the entry-level is pricy. 

I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It takes a team of five to maintain the solution.

This solution can reduce the resources required to run a security operation center by two-thirds.

The solution's reports are intuitive and informative.

Darktrace is used for network security.

Darktrace has helped our organization be secure from network spam and attacks.

The most valuable features of Darktrace are the tracing of unusual external emails and monitoring the local network.

Darktrace could improve its features, such as monitoring and detecting ransomware. 

I have been using Darktrace for approximately three months.

Darktrace is a stable solution.

The scalability of Darktrace is good.

We have four companies that are using this solution.

I have not used the support from Darktrace.

The initial setup of Darktrace was simple. The deployment of Darktrace took approximately two weeks.

I am using a demo of Darktrace for deployment and testing which is free.

My company chose Darktrace because it helped other companies that needed some help with metrics monitoring and spam monitoring.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Darktrace a ten out of ten.

Darktrace makes up part of our security solution and it is able to operate without intervention from IT staff. Antigena feature for automatic response is awesome.

You can have a one-person IT team and with Darktrace, you can get notification of potential threats that are incoming or are already happening on the network.

I like the Antigena feature in Darktrace, as it offers immediate response and is helpful.

This product collects more data than your traditional type of software, which is useful for us.

Darktrace picks up anomalies as soon as they arise.

The interface is too mathematical and it should be simplified. If you are a seasoned user then you would know where to go, but you have to learn it first. The terminologies being used are mostly numbers. In general, it could be more user-friendly. The GUI can be more simplified and the sections on the interface can be better organised. Usability and visibility of features can improve the skills of administrators and the product will be a preferred solution and ratings will increase.

My experience with Darktrace is short because we are just implementing it now.

The stability of Darktrace is fine.

We do not intend to scale. Scalability is more of a contract issue that comes into play if you want to add nodes to the system. We are opting for a specific number of nodes or endpoints, which we would be able to keep for quite a number of years. I don't expect that we will expand that much, so scalability should not be an issue.

We have been in contact with technical support using different platforms. We have dealt with them using Microsoft Teams, Zoom, WhatsApp and via email.

Positive

No

The initial setup was quite simple and straightforward, taking about an hour to complete. After that, the port modeling took perhaps an hour or two.

Vendor Team

If you consider the features and the cost of market leaders, we are satisfied with the pricing.

Snode

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Darktrace is a very good solution.

Darktrace is very useful for us because it has a large number of models for detecting threats.

There are numerous false positives.

Darktrace requires numerous configurations. It would be beneficial if the configuration could be made simpler.

I have been using Darktrace for three years.

Darktrace is very stable.

Darktrace is easy to scale. It's a scalable solution.

Technical support is good.

The initial setup is difficult.

It took three or four months to deploy.

People must first examine the network architecture in order to make the best implementation.

Darktrace is a very good solution, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Darktrace is a platform that is used to check all infrastructures. They check the compartmental in the network.

It is a very good platform for understanding what is going on in your network or in your environment because it checks all the activities. This is the same when I use activities on the device, server, network, and web, it checks it all.

The platform has many modules, and each module examines a different situation in the behavior.

It's a very complex platform.

I have been working with Darktrace for approximately one year.

Darktrace is a stable product.

It's a scalable platform.

The technical support is not very good.  I believe that the support must be very quick and operational. Support will need to grow in Italy, but I'm not sure about the other side.

It's an expensive solution.

While it is complex, and difficult to use, once you understand the correct way to use it, it's a very good platform. I would rate Darktrace a nine out of ten.

Overall, I like the system. The product offers us a very good user interface and we've found the network visibility to be very good so far. The solution has one window and shows all networks.

The solution comes in multiple languages, including English and Arab options.

The solution is stable.

We've found that technical support is helpful and available to assist us if we need them.

There are some automation capabilities, however, they could be presented better.

The manual is difficult to follow. While it presents some use cases, it's not very clear. There may also be some language barriers, as it's not available in my language.

Some aspects of the initial setup are complex. 

It would be useful if there was a way to check to see if there are certain devices that are not in sync with the solution. I'm not sure if this is an option or not. 

The cost of the solution is quite high.

I'm very interested in ISO 27001 and these processes. I'd like to better understand how it supports this kind of workflow.

I haven't used the solution for very long. It may only be about 20 hours or so. It's very, very new. 

The solution is mostly stable. I found that, during the POC, sometimes my rights would do off and I would have to reinstate them, however, other than that, it was very stable. The performance was good. 

I've only used the solution for a short amount of time. I can't really speak to the scalability. There were different models that I tried, however, I can't speak about how different models affect the scalability. I've only used it for a very short amount of time.

There are maybe three or four people on the solution, now that we've tested it. 

I haven't really interacted so much with technical support, however, there is a person available to us that could help us troubleshoot or answer our questions if we need assistance. 

There are aspects of the initial setup that are not very straightforward. there is some complexity. I needed to keep going back to the manual to check things at certain points. 

We are still currently in the test period. Within the year, we will have to invest in the cost of licensing. We have not done that yet.

The solution itself is quite expensive. 

We did look at other solutions, however, I can't speak to which solutions we actually looked at.

We are a partner.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. My understanding is that it is version 5.

I would recommend the solution to others. However, it's important to ensure you use the solution in order to set up your processes correctly and to the benefit of the organization.

So far, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.