ESET Inspect provides strong EDR capabilities with user-friendly operations and multilayered security for threat detection and response, supporting efficient management across multiple devices.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ESET Inspect | 1.1% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 7.4% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 5.9% |
| Other | 85.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ESET Inspect vs CrowdStrike Falcon | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ESET Inspect vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | ESET Inspect vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 7.4% | 97% | 140 interviewsAdd to research |
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 4.2 | 3.5% | 96% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
ESET Inspect features a transparent pricing model with no setup costs, facilitating an efficient integration process for users. Pricing methods typically revolve around subscription-based models, accommodating per-user or per-device licensing options. The pricing range is adaptable, catering to organizations of varying sizes and security requirements, providing effective endpoint inspection solutions.
ESET Inspect enables organizations to manage security effectively through its lightweight connector, handling EDR/XDR services for vulnerability and attack management. It allows tracking of potential threats, including lateral movements and anomaly detection, and employs XML-based rules for customized filtering. The interface supports exception management and a learning mode, enhancing control over false positives. Performance, stability, and flexible deployment options add value to its comprehensive security approach.
What are the key features of ESET Inspect?ESET Inspect is often deployed by administrators in industries requiring stringent security management, such as IT services and business sectors with sensitive data handling. It is used for network monitoring, antivirus protections across desktops, laptops, and servers, allowing proactive responses to threats with built-in and regularly updated rules.
ESET Inspect was previously known as ESET Enterprise Inspector.
Mitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Cannon, T-Mobile
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| CEO at IOPoint.com | 4.0 | We use ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security due to its performance, stability, and reliable mobile protection. While its ransomware protection needs improvement, we switched from Trend Micro and Sophos for better pricing and comparable features. |
| ICT Manager at Bouwbedrijf de Vries en Verburg BV | 4.0 | ESET Inspect offers valuable features like vulnerability management across workstations, but it is complex to configure and requires tuning. While learning is essential, its ability to isolate machines and quickly react to attacks is beneficial. |
| Data Engineer at Berief Food GmbH | 4.0 | I find ESET Enterprise Inspector's most valuable feature to be its EDR capabilities. However, I believe the platform's pricing could be improved. I haven't used or considered other solutions, and there is no specific deployment or cloud provider mentioned. |
| ESET Support at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 5.0 | ESET Inspect is a cloud and on-prem XDR tool for managing network security. Its XML-based rules, exceptions, and Learning mode are valuable for tracking threats. However, a steep learning curve and solid server power are necessary for effective implementation. |
| ESET Support at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I've found ESET Inspect to be a robust, lightweight tool that offers deep network insights with customizable rules and efficient processes. Although configuration can be complex, ESET's support helps maintain usability. Previously, we used Symantec and Kaspersky solutions. |
| Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.0 | We use ESET Enterprise Inspector on cloud and on-premise; it's user-friendly and detects threats well. However, it consumes too many resources, needs improvement in integrating agents, and negatively impacts user satisfaction compared to older solutions. |
| Senior ICT Specialist at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | I use this solution for antivirus. While I value its multilayered endpoint security and data collection, I find it unstable and less scalable than competitors like McAfee. Its pricing and customer support could also improve. |
My organization uses ESET Inspect for antivirus and internet security on laptops and desktops. On the enterprise side, we utilize it on our Windows Server.
The platform has improved our organization's security by providing comprehensive antivirus and internet security solutions. It is fast and efficient, enhancing our system's performance without significant slowdowns.
The product's most valuable features are its performance and stability. It is a simple installer and provides reliable protection without causing system issues. Additionally, it includes a free mobile license, offering extended protection for mobile devices.
One area that needs improvement for the product is ransomware protection, which does not offer complete security.
I've been using ESET Inspect for the last two years within my organization.
The solution is stable.
The platform is scalable, depending on the number of licenses purchased. It can easily be escalated to accommodate more users.
The customer service experience has been mixed. While the distributor provides basic support, we sometimes need additional help from the IT background.
We used Trend Micro and Sophos before. We switched to ESET due to its better pricing and comparable features.
The initial setup was straightforward. It is a simple installer, and the process is user-friendly.
We implemented the product in-house. The central management allows us to handle the setup and configuration efficiently.
The platform's licensing is affordable and straightforward. We purchase soft keys, install them, and manage the license through their portal. There are no hidden or extra costs involved.
I recommend ESET Inspect for its comprehensive features and affordability. However, users should customize the settings to enhance security, especially against ransomware.
I rate it an eight out of ten.
The solution is a little bit complex because it has a lot of filters, and it needs to be tuned properly. ESET Inspect offers a learning mode. It takes some amount of learning to be able to work with ESET Inspect. I have to work it out in combination with Microsoft Sentinel and with connectors when it comes to ESET Inspect.
The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that you can manage and react to vulnerabilities and attacks on all the workstations or laptops. You can put certain workstations and isolation. With ESET PROTECT, you see only one machine that is protected, but with ESET Inspect, you see all the machines that are protected in an environment.
The product is complex to configure, and there are too many errors that are not errors, making it an area that can be considered for improvement.
I have been using ESET Inspect for four or five weeks. I use the solution's latest version.
It is a stable solution. The only thing you have to do is to tune the product.
Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution.
Our company's clients use ESET Inspect as the same set that uses ESET PROTECT, which comes to around 200 users.
There are plans to increase the use of the solution in the company since, in the beginning, we had 160 licenses, and now we have 230 licenses.
The product's deployment phase is easy, but the tuning part is complicated.
With the need for security, I think two hours a day to deploy not only ESET Inspect but also Microsoft Sentinel to make combinations for our projects.
I am the only technical person in my company who takes care of the product's deployment and maintenance.
The product's installation phase was carried out with the help of a consultant.
With the product, we can quickly react to attacks.
ESET Protect now offers a range of products for endpoint protection and Office 365. With cloud solutions like OneDrive and SharePoint, you have more things in your enterprise applications, and it should be good when ESET can manage such products, too.
There is a need to pay for the licensing costs of the solution, and I feel it is a very expensive product.
I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it since, from the beginning, we have been using ESET Inspect in our company, initially on an on-premises model and then on the cloud. My company also uses ESET Two-Factor Authentication Security, and I hope that the solution gets deployed on the cloud next year.
It is a reliable tool to get a lot of information about attacks, but you have to use it with other tools, like Microsoft Sentinel.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
The platform's price could be better.
I have experience working with ESET for 12 years. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.
The platform's technical support team is good and responsible.
The platform gets automatically updated for the new versions. We have three administrators to manage it.
The platform is expensive; it could be cheaper. However, it is an essential part of our network's security.
I recommend ESET Enterprise Inspector to others and rate it an eight out of ten.
ESET Inspect is an interactive XDR tool for managing network security. It is available in the cloud and on-prem.
With ESET Inspect, we have a tool for responding to incidents and managing events on endpoint computers and servers, investigating events and potential indicators of compromise.
In cybersecurity, you need to stay on top of attackers. We can track technics and tactics advisories use and potential lateral movement before damage is done. You can define any file, network, or registry operation you want to monitor to identify attack methods used.
Rules are the most valuable feature of ESET Inspect. They are created through XML language, and they track and filter events from endpoints. If the event matches the rule, the rule is triggered. Exceptions are the second most valuable feature because it gives you the power to filter false positives in large numbers. The third most valuable feature is the Learning mode that facilitates making exceptions for known processes with a good reputation.
Every vendor is working on making the job of SOC analysts easier, with fewer false positives and more precise detections. ESET uses LiveGrid technology that provides feedback on the reputation of files and operations. It's hard to eliminate all of the false positives, but hopefully, we'll see some improvement with the advances in AI.
For XDR tools like ESET Inspect, customers must have a higher knowledge of Windows internals and other "under the hood" processes that are underlying day-to-day activities in the network. There is a challenging learning curve that customers need to master and for the adequate implementation of an XDR solution, time is needed. Not for the installation of the software, that's easy, but for setting the solution to work satisfactorily concerning specifics of the environment. Also, never mind ESET's traditionally light footprint, every XDR solution asks for solid server power to process raw events from endpoints. The more you want to return for forensics, the larger the database.
I have worked with ESET solutions for 16 years, and around three years with ESET Inspect.
Scalability is a matter of how well the network and permissions are configured, the bandwidth, and your desired retention policy for raw data. If the network is good, the additional installation of the ESET Inspect Connector is 20MB per machine. If you want to see all events from endpoints, the database with be more extensive. If you only want to see events regards the detections, the database size will be smaller. I rate ESET Inspect 10 out of 10; regardless of the network's size or collaboration, I never had an issue.
I rate ESET support 10 out of 10. In terms of support, ESET is one of the best companies globally because it has local teams in every country. All levels of support are free, and response is fast and accurate, like the product itself.
Positive
We were always on ESET and never had an issue. ESET Inspect can't be installed without a standard ESET Endpoint protection client
I rate ESET Inspector a nine out of 10 for ease of setup. It isn't a one-click installation, but it's straightforward. We often deploy it on-prem because governments and financial institutions often cannot put data on the cloud.
The deployment time depends on the size of the network and the number of endpoints. You must deploy a 20 MB connector to every computer in your network. You can do a small grid in a few hours, but more extensive networks can take days.
We deployed the solution in-house.
The price of ESET Inspect varies depending on the license the customer selects, the number of protected endpoints, and whether is on-premise or in the cloud solution. ESET Inspect in the cloud raw events retention policy differs from the on-premises solution.
I rate ESET Inspect a nine out of 10. Anyone who is considering an EDR solution needs to be ready to learn. You must invest in cybersecurity education, and continuous improvement, while you tailor your EDR to help you, not to be a burden. A tool can only help you if you learn how to use it correctly and develop your cybersecurity skills. It's a tool, not a magic wand.
ESET Protect & Inspect Cloud is an extremely powerful tool. When you look at a traditional anti-malware solution, you can see it as a relatively passive solution that actively monitors your network for malware without your interference on a regular day-to-day basis. Sure, the admin's role is to deploy and configure such a solution and respond to emerging issues, but in the majority of cases, antimalware solutions do the magic on their own, automatically.
As opposed to that, XDR solution gives the administrator a deep insight into all ongoing processes on every endpoint and server in real-time, and tools to respond to events that are maybe suspicious or unwanted in the network. Sure, there is a certain level of automation that is necessary for managing a large database of events, based on the cloud reputation system (ESET Live GRID) and built-in rules that simplify administration, but still - the admin has a decisive role in every process. You can keep an eye out for executables, dependencies, registry keys, and network connections, all in one console. Every anomaly will be detected, with deep insight into what is going on in your network.
EPIC management is based on built-in and, later on, your custom rules and exclusions that you defined in a response to events that occurred. There are over a thousand built-in rules that are constantly updated by ESET engineers and they are monitoring ongoing processes. For example, in one case, EPIC informed me that one of my colleagues is using a nonstandard port in his Outlook. If the company policy doesn't allow that, I can intervene based on the information. If some app is trying to modify the startup folder, you will be notified. If some process is trying to modify a standard or build a new registry key that is previously unknown, you will know the source, possible malicious or benign causes, and all other required information about the case that will help you decide if it's bad or not. If it's bad, you can kill the process, isolate or shut down the endpoint and make the rule that will deal with it next time it occurs. If it's OK, you can create an exclusion that will ignore the case for that particular endpoint, a whole department, or the entire network. After a while, perhaps a month or two of actively monitoring your network, you will, practically, build a white list of allowed processes, and we all know how whitelisting can be useful in IT security, overall.
It gave us an insight into the regular, day-to-day operations on endpoints and servers and a pretty remarkable and continuous penetration tool for ongoing testing of our environment.
The rules are the most useful feature. On the vendor side, rules are created and distributed to EPIC servers continuously. A rule is defined using XML-based language and they are the behavior and reputation-based descriptions that EPIC can identify from the received events and metadata which he then updates, or they update the rules to update. EPIC now has around 1,000 rules that define all sorts of behavior in the network. With custom rules, you can additionally define specific behavior and remediate, for example, exploitation of log4j vulnerability.
Also, the Learning mode in the exclusions section is extremely useful. True ML EPIC can smell reoccurring benign events and offer the creation of exclusion for such events. The administrator can check an offered exclusion, deny it or proceed with creation.
ESET Inspect Connector, the required component on the endpoint side, takes a few percent of processor time, nothing noticeable indeed, which is not the case for most other vendors. EDR/XDR is a very demanding service, but ESET managed to make it lightweight, like in all other of their products.
ESET's main goal is to create lightweight, highly configurable products with a high detection rate. Sometimes it can be overwhelming for customers to have such a vast area of possibilities for configuring and ways to solve problems in the implementation or exploitation of ESET software. Customers like easy-to-use solutions with not much servicing under the hood, and that's perfectly fine. We all like the administration where software does it all by itself, but that's not possible in the area of IT security. The vendor's job is to provide easy-of-use, but not to jeopardize the abbility to configure protection to the smallest details. ESET successfully maintains that perfect balance through the years, and with exceptionally good technical support, you can find answers to every question.
My company has been selling ESET security products for 20+ years.
ESET PROTECT Cloud Enterprise in a bundle with the ESET Cloud Office Security, are the products we use. ESET Protect & Inspect Cloud is a part of the Enterprise bundle, practically an add-on on top of the regular ESET Business protection package.
Former known as ESET Enterprise Inspector, now ESET Protect & Inspect Cloud (EPIC) is a brand-new ESET XDR product based in the cloud. Extended EDR solutions (XDR) are the next big thing in the world of IT security because they add a new layer of protection with extended detection and response features they provide. Like all cloud solutions, EPIC is hosted on ESET servers, so there is no need for engaging customers' infrastructure and resources for deploying such a demanding server. It can serve up to 5000 clients for now.
If it's not working, I am doing something wrong. There are no "ghost" problems with ESET products.
When it comes to scalability, the main concern is how well the network is built. We have ESET installations ranging from five to 20,000 endpoints, and we have no issues with the software itself. The good thing is that we've been able to find a solution for every case.
Providing support as well as the product is our main concern. Percent of renewal customers tells us that we are doing a good job.
Positive
Yes, we used to have Symantec and Kaspersky solutions, but ESET's powerful and lightweight culture prevailed for many, many years.
The deployment time depends on the size of the network. For example, my company has about 100 devices, including servers, endpoint devices, and mobile devices. If you've prepared your network environment so that no other antivirus products are present before installing, and if you have a good, maintained infrastructure, you should be able to complete all of the work from bringing a server up to configuring policies, preparing packages and deploying them in about two hours.
It's done in-house. We must be knowledgeable about the product we are selling. If I'm having some trouble in deployment, the main point of contact is the regional ESET headquarters which then communicates with the vendor.
There is a saying in Serbia - quickly, quality, pricey, pick up two.
If your network is in good, working order, implementation of ESET products won't be a problem. If you administer a neglected infrastructure, you will still be able to finish the job along with ESET support that has years of experience and very good documentation.
Don't always go for the cheapest option and test the solution before purchasing. Every vendor offers a month of a trial which is sufficient for making a decision.
Check for users' opinions on sites like this, they will tell you what hurts the most.
I've mostly written about EPIC, but that's only one of the products ESET provides. The EPIC is, in fact, an upgrade to existing ESET products that already have proven themselves, and this one won't be any different. The recipe is the same - fast, capable, configurable, lightweight with advanced technology and perfect tech. support.
We are using ESET Enterprise Inspector for security.
The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise. One of our clients has a large number of devices and they are using the solution on the cloud using Amazon AWS.
One of our previous clients was utilizing a different EDR solution and was unable to fully comprehend the incident's flowchart. They were uncertain about the origin and the affected areas of the incident, and they could not determine which executable was capable of fixing the damage. As a result, we conducted a proof of concept test to demonstrate the effectiveness of ESET Enterprise Inspector. This test was invaluable in showcasing the flowchart of the incident and the specific executable required to resolve the issue. Subsequently, when the malware propagated to new devices, we were able to capture and document all the incidents in one centralized location.
ESET Enterprise Inspector's greatest asset lies in its user-friendly interface, which allows for easy navigation and thorough analysis of incidents.
The solution has effective detection of pre-execution tasks and the detection at the EDR level is beneficial. It helps detect malicious activity before the files are executed.
The solution could improve the consumption of resources. The RAM and CPU usage increases during usage which can cause issues. We have three separate services and it would be beneficial if all were executed from one agent limiting the over usage of system resources.
Persuading clients to install two agents for a single solution is an arduous task as it can lead to increased consumption due to the use of two separate agents.
It would be beneficial if there was a network-level log for all the network devices for the EDR.
I have been using ESET Enterprise Inspector for approximately two years.
The stability of the solution needs to improve. We often are putting the hotfix on the servers and upgrade the agents and the servers.
EDR is a new tool for ESET and research troubleshooting steps.
I rate the scalability of ESET Enterprise Inspector a six out of ten.
The support in India is limited. We are providing support to our customers. We were providing similar support as the vendor.
Setting up ESET Enterprise Inspector initially is uncomplicated. However, when migrating servers where certificates are established, complexity arises, and the agents may go unreported. The IP can change on the cloud server causing some migration issues.
The return on investment is not apparent as customers are complaining about the complexity of the new EDS solution, which requires managing two agents and prolongs the troubleshooting process. It is challenging to determine the root cause of issues, and customers are comparing it unfavorably to the earlier, more manageable EDS solution. Consequently, the end-users find it less user-friendly and more challenging to use, leading to complaints and a less satisfying experience.
I would advise others who want to use ESET Enterprise Inspector that fine-tuning the solution is necessary.
I rate ESET Enterprise Inspector a four out of ten.
My primary use case for this solution is antivirus protection, spam protection and IDS.
I find that the Data Collection feature has improved my organization. We can view comprehensive data about newly executed modules. This includes: time of execution, user dwell time and attacked devices. All data is also locally stored to prevent sensitive data leakage.
I find the multilayered endpoint security to be the most valuable feature. It prevents malicious modules from being executed in the organization's network. ESET Enterprise Inspector's open architecture gives the flexibility to detect violations of policies about using specific software like torrent applications, cloud storages, Tor browsing or other unwanted software.
It is not a stable product. In comparison to McAffee, we were disappointed.
It is not as strong as competitors like Fortinet or McAffee.
The tech support is OK, but there is room for improvement.
I previously used McAffee and Symantec Endpoint Protection solutions.
The initial setup was straightforward. It is easy to install.
In my opinion, the pricing and licensing are the big issues now. If the price was less than other companies, or a one-time charge for service was available, I think there would be more users of this solution.
This solution is easy to install, setup and monitor. It has a lot of new features that are worthwhile. These new features include: historic threat hunting, open architecture, in-cloud or on-premise scans and more.
