IBM Informix is renowned for its high performance and reliability, especially optimized for OLTP settings. Supporting large data volumes with scalability and advanced data management features, Informix efficiently integrates SQL and NoSQL capabilities within hybrid environments.


| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM Informix | 3.6% |
| SQLite | 16.6% |
| Firebird SQL | 14.0% |
| Other | 65.8% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata | 4.1 | N/A | 88% | 83 interviewsAdd to research |
| SQL Server | 4.2 | N/A | 93% | 274 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 62 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
IBM Informix provides comprehensive capabilities tailored for robust database management and industry applications. Designed for handling concurrent data processing, its advanced replication, data compression, and seamless scalability are key highlights. Despite facing challenges such as less replication enhancement and SQL compatibility, Informix remains crucial for sectors like healthcare, banking, and government, integrating effectively with Unix-based systems. While some users seek improved AI features, enhanced tools, and simpler administration, Informix stands as a reliable choice for demanding data tasks.
What are the main features of IBM Informix?IBM Informix plays a central role in sectors such as healthcare, banking, telecommunications, and government by supporting crucial operations through data processing, replication, and backup tasks. Its ability to integrate into Unix-based systems makes it widely adopted for applications, analytics, and real-time industry needs, especially in organizations focusing on OLTP systems.
IBM Informix was previously known as Informix.
Shaspa, Hildebrand, Kaifa, Ranhill Powertron, Federaci‹ Farmacutica (FedeFarma), Camden Council, The German Aerospace Center (DLR), Myers, Votorantim Group, Doosan Infracore, GreenIvory
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| DB Consultant at i2c | 2.0 | I've used IBM Informix for 10 years for OLTP systems due to legacy reliance; it's secure, stable, and cost-effective, but suffers frequent bugs and lacks modern features, and its low market demand limits professional growth opportunities. |
| Senior Oracle Database and Systems Administrator at Dedagroup | 3.0 | I use IBM Informix as a central database solution for various applications and business intelligence tools. While it supports multiple environments, it could improve in performance and aligning with current software trends, especially when compared to Oracle. |
| ING ( technical developer) at Centrum | 5.0 | I use IBM Informix primarily for educational purposes, focusing on testing concurrency and locking capabilities. It excels in handling large-scale data types and OLTP mode. However, it lacks package support, unlike Oracle. Previously, I used Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. |
| General Manager and Architect - Informix Expertise at Begooden-IT Consulting | 4.5 | As an experienced consultant, I value IBM Informix for its extreme stability, resilience, and replication features. While its mid-range pricing and IBM's sales neglect are issues, I highly recommend it for its overall reliability once configured. |
| Executive Director at Dynamic Tomorrow | 5.0 | This feature-rich product is incredibly stable and scalable for my diverse customers, requiring almost zero maintenance. While initial setup is complex for beginners, I find it easy. Overall, I rate it highly despite the installation challenges for new users. |
| Head of Department at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I find Informix stable and reliable for our customer data, having used it for 20 years. However, its lack of innovation and new features, unlike Oracle, is driving our company's complete migration to a more modern, feature-rich solution. |
| Database Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees | 4.0 | I've used Informix for 20 years, finding its stability and scalability excellent with easy setup. Despite my satisfaction, its high cost, poor marketing, and missing features mean my company is unfortunately moving to other solutions. |
| Acting Snr Manager: Enterprise Architecture & Process Management at Road Accident Fund | 1.0 | I primarily use IBM Informix for case applications. However, I've encountered performance issues and difficulty finding skilled workers. There's room for improvement in terms of performance and ease of use, as I'm unsure if the problem lies with the database. |