Our primary use case is web filtering for K-12. We have approximately 1700 learners.
Director of Technology at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Because of the tool, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis
Pros and Cons
- "Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD."
- "Because of iboss, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis."
- "SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
We switched to 1-to-1 iPads, needing more control and ease of use.
Because of iboss, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis. As a department, we were able to spend our time making a difference in our learning education experience other than being the web monitoring police.
What is most valuable?
- Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD.
- The reporting was as detailed as much as you requested.
- Filtering different age group of learners is imperative to allow the secondary learners with more access to information on the web and restricting our primary learners to areas of the web that we could trust.
What needs improvement?
SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment.
Buyer's Guide
iboss
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about iboss. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
How are customer service and support?
The tech support has been great. They speak English well.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Works at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Within the filter, controls such as Web categories and applications simplify tasks
Pros and Cons
- "Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."
- "This product is solid, fairly easy to use, and reliable."
- "The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability with in the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing. It is kind of there, but it's not perfect. Quite frequently, I receive links that lead me to pages with error messages."
- "To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."
How has it helped my organization?
It helps document internet activities and prevent exposure to inappropriate materials.
What is most valuable?
- Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets).
- Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and reports.
They simplify daily tasks and are easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The area I would like to see improvement in is the ability with in the reporter to navigate directly to the content the user is traversing. It is kind of there, but it's not perfect. Quite frequently, I receive links that lead me to pages with error messages such as, "An error occurred while processing your request. Reference #216.6e29d242.1516384232.1523647."
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Yes. To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased. However, I think this new device will solve their scalability issues.
How is customer service and technical support?
Nine out of 10. No complaints.
What other advice do I have?
I rate it an eight out of 10. There could be a few changes, but it's a solid product.
Look into the iboss Node Blade Chassis and not 14600. This product is solid, fairly easy to use, and reliable.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free iboss Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2026
Product Categories
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Internet Security Web Content Filtering Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) ZTNA as a ServicePopular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Cloudflare One
Cisco Umbrella
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Okta Platform
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
Zscaler Internet Access
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
Netskope
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
FortiSASE
Skyhigh Security
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
Prisma SD-WAN
Buyer's Guide
Download our free iboss Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Looking Into Implementing a Web Security Solution.
- What is the difference between point solutions (SD-WAN, NGFW, SWG, VPN) and SASE?
- What questions do you need to ask when choosing a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solution?
- When evaluating Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Has anyone ever heard of secureaccess.com?
- What is the difference between SASE and SD-WAN?
- What is the difference between SASE and CASB?
- What SASE solution does your company use?
- Why is SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) important?
- What SASE solution do you recommend?












