Kiuwan Reviews

We only used these products to do some demos. The feedback was very positive.

Our organization is a product distributor. We don’t use the product internally. But for the customers/leads we presented it to, they see that it can add a lot of value to validate what they receive from their providers.

From a maketing perspective, I would suggest demonstrating that using these tools will make money for the customer. The customer should have a clear vision of what they purchsed and what they received. They should push more technical articles on LinkedIn. There is always space to make things better, but for now, it is making a difference.

These products have some dreams, as I heard from some Dev Managers, but I’m sure that with a closer relationship, we can upscale that.

We are only showing the product to leads as demos.

The technical support is very good. We have received valid answers to our questions.

We had some experienced with Rational and Compuware, in addition to the APM tools that we distribute.

The pricing and licensing models are poor. If it has a SaaS, the hybrid solution will be enough.

We did very careful research of solutions on the market and chose this one for our demos.

“A fool with a tool is still a fool”. Chose somebody who can add the right processes, methods, and techniques to actually implement the customers' objectives. We try to build a eco-system to cross-sell our solutions.

There is a mix between maturity and money. That is the barrier to break before showing the customer that he is purchasing something without risks before he goes into production. They should focus on a product that adds value to the corporation.

• Constant evolution
• Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP
• Excellent feedback
• Integration with SDLC tools
• API

SAP and no-SAP static source code analysis, including security integrated in the continuous delivery process of our SDLC.

I would like to see additional languages supported.

We have been using this solution for one and a half years.

There were no stability issues.

There were no scalability issues.

I would give technical support a rating of 9/10.

We used Sonar and we switches due to costs with ABAP and the iOS modules.

The initial setup could not be simpler. It is a SaaS solution. Integration with Jenkins and the local analyzer is a great solution.

Check with your account manager.

Integrate it with your SDLC.

The solution gave us a KPI regarding risk and quality in the development process.

I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable. I test code to pass PCI DSS requirements. I have improved my QA acceptance process with risk evaluation.

The QA developer and security could be improved.

I have not encountered any issues with stability.

I have not encountered any issues with scalability.

I would give technical support a rating of 10 out of 10.

I did not use a different solution in the past.

The initial setup was easy.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing this one.

Try the solution and you will likely want to implement it into your organization. The solution will measure your development team, give a KPI for the CISO, reduce the time it takes to find and correct coding errors, and more.

• Easy, intuitive UI loaded with information about the software quality
• Automated lifecycle management
• Application portfolio governance support
• Technology coverage from COBOL to JS through ABAP: ideal for large organizations with legacy core systems trying to leverage new digital capabilities

• Monitor outsourced development and maintenance to assert each € spent has adequate return in quality and security.
• Helped outsourcers to increase the capacity to deliver acceptable code.

• Identification of OSS usage and multiple versions in use throughout portfolio

I have used it for one year.

We have not encountered any deployment issues whatsoever; pretty straightforward analysis both on-premises or in the cloud.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues; applied it both for small portfolios and millions-of-lines portfolios.

Customer service is excellent; extremely helpful and knowledgeable about the subject matter.

Technical support is excellent; only needed to revert to customer support once, and I got immediate support and resolution on my request.

We previously used several tools. We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup.

It is extremely simple to setup, either to run on-site or in the cloud; and plenty of hooks to integrate with any automation engine.

It was implemented by an in-house team with direct support from Kiuwan.

• Loads of bang for the buck.

Before choosing this product, we evaluated other options.

By far, the best feature we have found is the possibility of creating specific action plans that automatically determine the effort required by our teams in order to correct defects and ensure better code.

Code reviews have significantly improved, and it allows our teams to work together in a collaborative cloud environment.

More languages and frameworks would enhance this tool.

I have used it for three years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is excellent. They have a very solid documentation site, as well as in-app support.

Technical support is 9/10.

We previously used SonarQube. We have a portfolio of apps in different programming languages. With Sonar, our costs escalated too much, having to pay for plugins for each language.

Initial setup is very straightforward; plug and play.

We implemented it in-house with the aid of Kiuwan engineers.

We have had an improvement of 20% in our time to market and it significantly improved the quality of our code.

I believe pricing varies according to the size of your apps.

We looked at Fortify and Checkmarx, but the costs were way too high

We also use other features of the product. We scaled from security to the entire lifecycle and governance management of our stack, which has given us a full control over our application portfolio.

• Very easy to use
• Integration with Jenkins and JIRA
• Security support

Code reviews are quicker and more reliable.

• Indicators regarding metrics

I have used it for three years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is excellent.

Technical support is very good.

We previously used a different solution. I switched because of the quotes and security rules.

Initial setup is straightforward, no doubt.

An in-house team implemented it.