Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] Logo

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] pros and cons

Vendor: Lenovo
4.1 out of 5
 

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] Pros review quotes

it_user1020 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Center at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Nov 21, 2012
Overall, the product has great value for money.
it_user328770 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Systems Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 15, 2015
We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis.
it_user334560 - PeerSpot reviewer
CIO at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 30, 2015
Before this solution, we used rack mount servers, but this solution saves physical spaces and increases reliability.
Find out what your peers are saying about Lenovo, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user378207 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Jun 1, 2016
The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC.
Alejandro Rivas Detomasi - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager | Service Delivery Coordinator at kyndryl
Jul 3, 2017
Excellent support in case of any failure (and I am not saying this because I worked for IBM)
it_user529200 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System Administrator at a consumer goods company with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 10, 2016
Central management of all blade servers and performance: It helps us to access blade servers remotely even at boot time, as well, when we can access the BIOS setup remotely.
it_user297360 - PeerSpot reviewer
Design and Develpement Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Nov 10, 2016
The technical support is very good.
it_user477012 - PeerSpot reviewer
Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company
Nov 22, 2017
Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance.
 

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] Cons review quotes

it_user1020 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Center at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Nov 21, 2012
It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server.
it_user328770 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Systems Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oct 15, 2015
Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult.
it_user334560 - PeerSpot reviewer
CIO at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 30, 2015
It needs better management software.
Find out what your peers are saying about Lenovo, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user378207 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Jun 1, 2016
Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues.
Alejandro Rivas Detomasi - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager | Service Delivery Coordinator at kyndryl
Jul 3, 2017
If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades.
it_user529200 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System Administrator at a consumer goods company with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 10, 2016
Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation.
it_user297360 - PeerSpot reviewer
Design and Develpement Engineer at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Nov 10, 2016
The storage part of this product needs to be improved.
it_user477012 - PeerSpot reviewer
Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company
Nov 22, 2017
Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it.

Product Categories

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons

Product Categories

Product Categories

Popular Comparisons