HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

7,163 Views
7,091 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers.

To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

Blade Servers (3rd)

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

TarunAudichey

CTO at Miraj

Centralized modular platform has improved data center management and supports mission-critical workloads

The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is very familiar. HPE Converged, however, is very large to understand for a new person. I am talking about training and management perspective, and user management. A system integrator and any system engineer who will operate and manage the system should find it easy to understand any configuration part and understanding part, which is currently a little bit tough. In Virtual Connect, we need some improvement. If we are going to move to hybrid, we need to easily move VM transactions from on-premises to cloud. We require a good, more easy process for day-to-day activities. Performance-wise, HPE BladeSystem is good regarding its ability to support mission-critical applications. However, reliability is all dependent on the core and memories, which will centrally control the entire blade and hyper-converged. We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage. We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.

Read full review

it_user477012

Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company

Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance

We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a single integrated solution that can be deployed anywhere, and is the best solution for our mobile tracking station."

"BladeSystem was done really well."

"The product has a lot of options for checking servers and IoT ports using artificial intelligence."

"The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The product is very robust and we have not experienced downtime within the last 11 years of use."

"It's a good product, it's reliable, the performance is good."

"I believe they are ahead of the other vendors (IBM, Dell and Cisco)."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC."

"The technical support is very good."

"Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance."

"The servers have enabled us to run critical applications, backup of critical data, and storage systems on the same products without downtime issues that could otherwise be caused by hardware or software issues."

"We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis."

"Before this solution, we used rack mount servers, but this solution saves physical spaces and increases reliability."

"Excellent support in case of any failure (and I am not saying this because I worked for IBM)"

"Central management of all blade servers and performance: It helps us to access blade servers remotely even at boot time, as well, when we can access the BIOS setup remotely."

More Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] pros

Cons

"HPE has a replacement system called Synergy, though it’s a more high-end system than the old C7000."

"The ecosystem of software that comes with HPE blade has been lacking. HPE's Rapid Deployment Pack (was rebranded Altiris when I used it) is a clunky solution for imaging blades and it may have been replaced."

"The support you get is dependant on the region. Some regions are better than others."

"I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers with the new ones designed by HPE, as the top team's version does not have it."

"It lacks a reboot service when the firmware breaks and needs upgrading."

"Stability, overall, is very good, and it’s kind of like an old jazz song -- when it’s good, it’s very good; but when it’s bad, it’s terrible."

"Hardware management could be improved. Cisco UCS has a more universal approach."

"It's quite an old product already having its successor HPE Synergy, which is in every aspect better than the c7000."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades."

"The storage part of this product needs to be improved."

"Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult."

"Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues."

"Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it."

"Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation."

"It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server."

"It needs better management software."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"The price could be cheaper."

"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."

"I don't have access to your financial information or the specific details of this solution's pricing. There are no additional fees. It is the hardware and the support."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"We have an annual license."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE BladeSystem?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Intel MFSYS25 vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Bull Blade Series Enterprise vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

October 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

October 2026

Download Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers

Overview

HPE BladeSystem provides centralized management and modular infrastructure, offering flexibility, efficiency, and high performance. Its compact and scalable design is suitable for seamless integration, enhancing connectivity while reducing downtime.

HPE BladeSystem is valued for its ability to consolidate infrastructure with reliable and scalable solutions, catering to needs across industries like telecommunications, finance, and education. Its intuitive management and robust connectivity deliver efficient management and power savings. However, improvements are needed in license registration, driver access, KVM integration, and cost effectiveness compared to competitors. Installation and software support require attention, and users seek better cloud integration.

What are HPE BladeSystem's key features?

iLO Remote Management: Enables effective remote server control and monitoring.
Centralized Management: Simplifies infrastructure oversight and reduces administrative load.
High Performance: Delivers efficient operation for demanding applications.
Modular Design: Allows flexible deployment and infrastructure consolidation.
Seamless Integration: Supports smooth integration with existing environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from HPE BladeSystem?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses through efficient power and space usage.
Reliability: Minimizes downtime with scalable and dependable performance.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and configuration processes.
Enhanced Management: Reduces administrative tasks with advanced control features.

HPE BladeSystem sees implementation in sectors like finance and telecommunications, being crucial for virtualization and enterprise applications involving VMware or Hyper-V. It supports operations such as high-availability clustering and data management, effectively maintaining legacy systems and enhancing server management with integrated tools.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.