HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

6,155 Views
6,093 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers.

To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

Blade Servers (3rd)

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

TarunAudichey

CTO at Miraj

Centralized modular platform has improved data center management and supports mission-critical workloads

The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is very familiar. HPE Converged, however, is very large to understand for a new person. I am talking about training and management perspective, and user management. A system integrator and any system engineer who will operate and manage the system should find it easy to understand any configuration part and understanding part, which is currently a little bit tough. In Virtual Connect, we need some improvement. If we are going to move to hybrid, we need to easily move VM transactions from on-premises to cloud. We require a good, more easy process for day-to-day activities. Performance-wise, HPE BladeSystem is good regarding its ability to support mission-critical applications. However, reliability is all dependent on the core and memories, which will centrally control the entire blade and hyper-converged. We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage. We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.

Read full review

it_user477012

Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company

Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance

We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the stability."

"We get higher density and better hardware maintenance."

"Have a serious look at this. It brings a lot of value for us."

"Basically, in a cluster, it works really nicely, especially within a cluster environment. Also, it's easily configurable."

"The solution is very stable; we find it to be quite reliable, with no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze while delivering very good performance."

"The interface and dashboard are excellent and user-friendly."

"BladeSystem provides consolidation of hardware into single or more manageable components."

"As it's modular (a small server) and has redundant hardware such as power, a SAN switch, and an interconnector, we do not need to worry when there is a failure."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"Overall, the product has great value for money."

"We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis."

"Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance."

"The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC."

"The servers have enabled us to run critical applications, backup of critical data, and storage systems on the same products without downtime issues that could otherwise be caused by hardware or software issues."

"The technical support is very good."

"BladeCenter HS22 provides great performance and reliability, with two Intel Xeon 5600 (3.60 GHz) processors and 12 VLP DDR-3 memory DIMMs, with expansion capability of 192 GB."

"Before this solution, we used rack mount servers, but this solution saves physical spaces and increases reliability."

More Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] pros

Cons

"They're not cheap, and for me to buy one is about $75,000 before I put any sort of server inside of it. I'd like the costing to come down a little bit."

"It is lacking in the ability to replicate virtual machines more easily."

"We are very happy with what we have, but HPE is not going to continue with BladeSystem. It will be discontinued so we will have to change to another product shortly."

"The tool is stable, although we have frequent failures in certain parts of it."

"The management side of this solution could be improved. In addition, HPE tech support is very poor."

"The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved."

"There could be some improvements that have to do with CPU architecture, but that's not really an HP part."

"We would like to see faster processing and more memory."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult."

"Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues."

"The storage part of this product needs to be improved."

"It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server."

"It needs better management software."

"Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation."

"Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it."

"If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."

"Its pricing was good. We selected this solution because it was within our budget. We paid just once when we bought it. We never bought any license."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"The price could be cheaper."

"We have an annual license."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

26%

Construction Company

14%

Performing Arts

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE BladeSystem?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Intel MFSYS25 vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

September 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers

Overview

HPE BladeSystem provides centralized management and modular infrastructure, offering flexibility, efficiency, and high performance. Its compact and scalable design is suitable for seamless integration, enhancing connectivity while reducing downtime.

HPE BladeSystem is valued for its ability to consolidate infrastructure with reliable and scalable solutions, catering to needs across industries like telecommunications, finance, and education. Its intuitive management and robust connectivity deliver efficient management and power savings. However, improvements are needed in license registration, driver access, KVM integration, and cost effectiveness compared to competitors. Installation and software support require attention, and users seek better cloud integration.

What are HPE BladeSystem's key features?

iLO Remote Management: Enables effective remote server control and monitoring.
Centralized Management: Simplifies infrastructure oversight and reduces administrative load.
High Performance: Delivers efficient operation for demanding applications.
Modular Design: Allows flexible deployment and infrastructure consolidation.
Seamless Integration: Supports smooth integration with existing environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from HPE BladeSystem?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses through efficient power and space usage.
Reliability: Minimizes downtime with scalable and dependable performance.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and configuration processes.
Enhanced Management: Reduces administrative tasks with advanced control features.

HPE BladeSystem sees implementation in sectors like finance and telecommunications, being crucial for virtualization and enterprise applications involving VMware or Hyper-V. It supports operations such as high-availability clustering and data management, effectively maintaining legacy systems and enhancing server management with integrated tools.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.