Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

HPE BladeSystem offers excellent scalability options, allowing users to expand by adding enclosures and maintaining flexibility in meeting changing business needs.
Ease of management is a standout feature of HPE BladeSystem, with its comprehensive hardware integration and centralized dashboard, facilitating seamless upgrades and resource management.
The modular architecture of HPE BladeSystem promotes energy efficiency and reduces cabling complexity, contributing to reduced operational costs in data center environments.
Reliability and stability are key strengths of HPE BladeSystem, evidenced by its long-term uptime and minimal hardware issues, providing robust performance even under demanding conditions.
HPE BladeSystem is known for its effective cooling and power consumption, offering high performance while optimizing energy use and data center space.

CONS

Non-disruptive firmware upgrades and integration capabilities need improvement.
Scalability is limited to 16 servers per chassis, impacting expansion efforts.
Manual processes are required when adding new chassis, lacking automation.
Access to spare parts is challenging, with issues in the ordering process.
HPE BladeSystem is being phased out, requiring the adoption of new technology like HPE Synergy.
 

HPE BladeSystem Pros review quotes

it_user470361 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Director of Technology at Resorts World Las Vegas
Jun 28, 2016
The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs.
it_user484740 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 24, 2016
When it comes to the BladeSystem, what we love about it most is being able to actually manage it using OneView.
NR
IT Network And Infrastructure Engineer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Aug 6, 2018
I really appreciate the integrated Onboard Administrator, the iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) modular network, and the SAN Switches.
Learn what your peers think about HPE BladeSystem. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user234675 - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage specialist, Infrastructure Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 1, 2017
It also has a pretty solid design and management.
it_user242895 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Administrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Jun 1, 2017
It provides a secure access to the console and reliable administration.
it_user677685 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Integration Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 4, 2017
The most valuable feature, of course, is its size as I can build a huge compute resource on it.
it_user736917 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 22, 2017
We are very happy with flexible NIC configuration features which are possible if you combine the BladeServers with HPE flex switches in the enclosures.
it_user784083 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect with 10,001+ employees
Dec 5, 2017
No issues with scalability. ​We can scale by adding another enclosure.
it_user793950 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Manager / Systems Specialist with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dec 26, 2017
Virtual Fabric and interconnects are easy to configure and maintain.
reviewer909156 - PeerSpot reviewer
VMware Software Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Aug 1, 2018
They are reliable, and it's relatively easy to manage them. They also regularly provide patching for the servers.
 

HPE BladeSystem Cons review quotes

it_user470361 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Director of Technology at Resorts World Las Vegas
Jun 28, 2016
Really look at it closely, but really look at the Synergy product as well. That seems to me like that's the next evolution of the BladeSystem.
it_user484740 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 24, 2016
I would like OneView to go over the current limit of 40 instances.
NR
IT Network And Infrastructure Engineer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Aug 6, 2018
This product needs a wider range of firmware compatibility matrix from the oldest to the newest blade server.
Learn what your peers think about HPE BladeSystem. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user234675 - PeerSpot reviewer
Storage specialist, Infrastructure Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 1, 2017
HPE has a replacement system called Synergy, though it’s a more high-end system than the old C7000.
it_user242895 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Administrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Jun 1, 2017
I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers with the new ones designed by HPE, as the top team's version does not have it.
it_user677685 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Integration Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 4, 2017
Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks.
it_user736917 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 22, 2017
Non-disruptive firmware upgrades in all areas of blade technology.
it_user784083 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect with 10,001+ employees
Dec 5, 2017
​It is really stable, however the motherboard sometimes crashes.
it_user793950 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Manager / Systems Specialist with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dec 26, 2017
​Storage capacity could be enhanced.
reviewer909156 - PeerSpot reviewer
VMware Software Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Aug 1, 2018
The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic.