HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.7% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 7.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

1,875 Views
1,838 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

825 Views
693 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 31, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and Supermicro SuperBlade are two products competing in the blade server market. HPE BladeSystem holds an advantage with its cost-effectiveness and reliability, while Supermicro SuperBlade shines with superior technology and performance for intensive computing environments.

Features: HPE BladeSystem is known for its modular design, efficient energy use, and robust management capabilities, making it easy to integrate with existing infrastructures. Supermicro SuperBlade offers exceptional computational power, flexibility, and advanced technology integration, ideal for tech-heavy environments requiring high processing power and scalability.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could enhance its high-performance computing capabilities, improve flexibility, and adopt more advanced technology integrations. Supermicro SuperBlade could benefit from reduced deployment complexity, optimized energy efficiency, and enhanced support systems for easier integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem offers straightforward deployment and comprehensive support services to ensure easy integration into enterprise systems. Supermicro SuperBlade, although sophisticated and performance-oriented, can require longer deployment times due to advanced configuration needs, but it provides detailed setup guides and responsive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem's competitive initial setup costs and quick return on investment appeal to budget-sensitive businesses. Conversely, Supermicro SuperBlade necessitates a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term benefits through superior performance and capability, making it attractive for organizations focusing on powerful computing solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,089 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.7%, up from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 7.6%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE BladeSystem	13.7%
Supermicro SuperBlade	7.6%
Other	78.7%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a secure access to the console and reliable administration."

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management. It is easy to communicate from the server to the storage."

"HPE BladeSystem is very easy to use."

"It is very stable."

"The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is simplified management."

"The technical support is good."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"We were pleased with the stability of the system as there were no downtimes for the last ten years due to hardware failures."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

Cons

"Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks."

"The setup process is complex."

"The support you get is dependant on the region. Some regions are better than others."

"The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic."

"The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved."

"The tool must provide integration with the cloud."

"The scalability is limited because you only have a 16-server by chassis."

"This product needs a wider range of firmware compatibility matrix from the oldest to the newest blade server."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"The solution does not scale well."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is high compared to one of its competitors."

"The price could be cheaper."

"Their licensing program is pretty simple."

"Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."

"It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."

"I don't have access to your financial information or the specific details of this solution's pricing. There are no additional fees. It is the hardware and the support."

"With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	103

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 66% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 24% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 11% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 10% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

September 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

October 2025

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

SuperBlade

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Prace

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

September 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.