HPE BladeSystem vs HPE NonStop comparison

HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE BladeSystem is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while HPE NonStop is ranked #12. HPE BladeSystem holds a 9.8% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE NonStop’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of HPE BladeSystem users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of HPE NonStop users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

2,986 Views
2,956 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE NonStop

Read 12 HPE NonStop reviews

963 Views
963 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

HPE NonStop

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop are both key components in HPE's server portfolio, competing in the enterprise data center space. While HPE NonStop has advantages in fault tolerance and continuous availability, HPE BladeSystem provides benefits with its modular design and cost-effectiveness.

Features: HPE BladeSystem is appreciated for its modular architecture, flexibility, and energy efficiency, which support a range of workloads. On the other hand, HPE NonStop features include unmatched fault tolerance, high scalability, and continuous availability, making it ideal for mission-critical applications.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could improve by enhancing its fault tolerance, offering better integration with existing IT infrastructure, and increasing scalability options. HPE NonStop could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing its initial setup cost, and improving user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem is known for its simple deployment model and positive customer service feedback, making implementation straightforward. HPE NonStop, although more complex to deploy due to its advanced features, is supported by a responsive service team that helps manage this complexity effectively.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem presents a more accessible price point and offers a favorable ROI for general enterprise needs. In contrast, HPE NonStop requires a higher initial investment but provides a long-term ROI by minimizing downtime and reducing maintenance for critical applications.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE NonStop

Ranking in Blade Servers

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 9.8%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE NonStop is 4.7%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE BladeSystem	9.8%
HPE NonStop	4.7%
Other	85.5%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

I researched on peerspot.com about IT solutions, specifically about HPE BladeSystem and HPE Synergy, because we are already using HP servers in our state data center. In HP Cloud System, we are using a converged infrastructure to connect LAN and SAN connectivity across the network. Regarding Virtual Connect technology, there is a noticeable impact on network management. For day-to-day operations, we use various applications such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to connect virtually. Using HPE BladeSystem Virtual Connect technology in HP Cloud System, we achieve efficient network management with well-defined LAN and SAN connectivity. We already have a defined modular architecture in place designed by the HP team for our data center. My company name is National Institute for Smart Government, also called NISG, under the National e-Governance Division. My title is Technology Management Consultant. I would rate HPE BladeSystem as an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Roni Wijaya

Vice President of It Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment

Since it is a legacy tool, there is a need to change it for flexibility. I think now it has improved because the security is very good. It is very secure for the performance of the machine critical application service, and it is very good. I don't know how to speak more on improvement needed because it's a good enough tool. However, depending on the application, it's limited. Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop. It is not flexible because I know that because of the compatibility of Java with HPE NonStop. When we are using Java, the performance is not good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is issue-free and works almost flawlessly."

"It has provided us with a platform on which we have been able to create innovative solutions for our customers at very reasonable prices."

"The solution has high performance."

"In contrast, HP can turn around in two weeks, which is a huge advantage for us."

"I have noticed that the solution does provide a very good ROI for companies."

"The tool is pretty good in terms of managing data, compiling the system, and expanding the infrastructure."

"The scalability is great."

"HPE BladeSystem is very easy to use."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"Because we're able to get immediate support, this prevents downtime and directly impacts cost savings."

"Implement it. You will never regret it."

"If you are contemplating a fault-tolerant, high uptime transaction processing machine with above normal transactions volumes - to act as a transaction server with infrequent changes to code - and you simply must have bulletproof performance - this might be the ticket."

"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."

"This is the standard for reliability and fault-resilience."

"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."

"It helps us to keep the business running 24/7."

"It is a nearly perfect product, although it also has some restrictions and short comings."

More HPE NonStop pros

Cons

"The early stages weren't as smooth as they should have been."

"We went from the P-class to the C-class because the P-class was not very good, and we haven’t had many issues since."

"The only thing we think is on the down side is that you can't push them anywhere near as hard as the pizza-box servers; the rack mounts."

"OA updates and upgrades have to be made simpler."

"The technical support itself is good, but you pay a lot of money for active services."

"One way to improve would be in the monitoring and reporting. We get one report per server and it's ten pages long, but at the end, there's no aggregate showing the order of the infrastructure."

"Some part of virtual connections needs improvement."

"I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers along with the new ones designed by HPE."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"The NonStop system is well priced, but the software that runs on it is quite pricey."

"The hardware fails often, and I feel that HP really needs to pay more attention to this issue."

"It is a nearly perfect product, although it also has some restrictions and short comings."

"There were some scalability issues. When we decided to migrate an application or port application, the limitations of these servers did not help us."

"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."

"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."

"I would never advise someone to buy or to implement the new NonStop because it's hard to find skilled people."

"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."

More HPE NonStop cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of HPE BladeSystem could improve. They need to reduce the price to be able to compete better with other vendors, such as Dell."

"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."

"The licenses for HPE BladeSystem are perpetual."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."

"With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"The price for HPE BladeSystem can vary between $100,000 to $1 million or above. The price can be high."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is too high. If they lowered the price substantially it would open up more opportunities. It's considered a replacement for the old 9000 boxes of HP. If it had a lower price, we would be able to compete in the financial, and other sectors and other solutions such as Terraform. Having a high price makes other solutions more attractive."

"HPE NonStop is definitely on the higher end."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 31% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 9% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE NonStop

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE NonStop

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE NonStop

Compared 9% of the time

Lenovo Flex System vs HPE NonStop

Compared 9% of the time

More HPE NonStop Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

March 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE NonStop

March 2026

Download HPE NonStop product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

HP NonStop, HPE Integrity NonStop

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

When availability matters, the new HPE Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture. HPE brings you an unparalleled portfolio of HPE Integrity NonStop systems the NonStop i family and the NonStop X family. These systems deliver the highest level of availability for the most-demanding, high-value workloads and customer-facing applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Bankart, Capital Securities Corporation

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

March 2026

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.