The sanitization is very good. Previously, we had to control certain files in which we would restrict which files could get delivered to user mailboxes until IT could verify them manually to ensure that they were clean. This allows us just to let them go through. They get sanitized, and they go through. It took a burden off of IT. There's the rare instance where we actually need the original file. For example, maybe a bank or our payroll company actually has put some code in the file that they need in order to work. However, it's greatly reduced the amount of work IT has to do. MetaDefender's ability to identify attacks, for example, spam, social engineering tags, blackmails, scams, et cetera, seems fine. I don't really monitor day-to-day to see. I haven't seen any obvious things get through. No one's reported that to us. It does detect malware; however, we don't get a ton of malware anyway. We do have another spam gateway as well in front and at the edge that gets things first. So that blocks a lot of things. However, if some of them get through, then MetaDefender blocks things that were missed. I'm happy about that. It does catch things. MetaDefender's ability to sanitize malicious content from documents or emails is great. I'm very happy with that. It's never let through anything malicious. Still, it does have some limitations. There are some documents with embedded hyperlinks that end up going to maybe a credential phishing site that it doesn't know. We'd have to check it ourselves. Thankfully, our users are pretty aware of those kinds of malicious threats. They do alert us to those. Having email security in the organization is essential. It's very important since we're routinely receiving files. We get most of our orders through email. A lot of people are looking at incoming emails that almost all have attachments in them. So making sure that those attachments are clean is very important to us. MetaDefender may have helped to improve our spam catch rate. If I'm looking at my dashboard over the last thirty days, I haven't seen any spam. That said, our other solution is doing pretty well at spam. Our spam rate is relatively low. It's mostly things that are actually legitimate advertising or companies that we have relationships with. It's not really spam. The combination of MetaDefender and SpamTitan is what we're using. We don't get very many false positives. If there is, we have to put in an exception for those.
