Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Reviews

Our use cases  involve customer segmentation for targeted marketing, where I use machine learning to identify potential customers interested in a new product. Another is a recommendation system on our company website, where I use machine learning to suggest additional products to customers based on their browsing or purchase history. Lastly, there is pricing estimation, where I use machine learning to predict the price of an item or article.

The features of Azure Machine Learning Studio that I find most valuable depend on the type of model I'm working with. For integration, knowing halfway indicators is crucial to assess model performance. For classification models, the confusion matrix is important for evaluation, while for regression models, statistical tests like the provision statistics are valuable.

One area where Azure Machine Learning Studio could improve is its user interface structure. Simplifying the initial information presented upon first use could make it more accessible, especially for users with limited technical skills. Providing only essential information upfront would enhance the user experience and reduce complexity.

I have been working with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for three years.

I would rate the stability of the solution at a six out of ten. Improving stability involves finding people with the right skills to handle problems that arise. While stability depends on how well the solution is installed, ongoing efforts are needed to address issues and refine the system. We are working step by step to identify and solve problems, but there's room to find more comprehensive solutions as they come up.

I would rate the scalability of Azure Machine Learning Studio at about a seven out of ten. While it offers high scalability, it can be challenging for less technical users and may encounter issues with defects and industrial licensing, particularly in logistics projects.

At our company, we use Azure Machine Learning Studio daily.

Before Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, we used on-premises solutions. We made the switch to Azure Machine Learning and the cloud to modernize our projects and leverage the benefits of cloud computing.

I use Azure Machine Learning Studio for predictive modeling in my project. I follow a workflow that involves selecting data, preprocessing it, training models, and deploying them. The Studio's tools cover all these steps, making it convenient for me to build and deploy predictive models.

In a specific scenario, I used Azure Machine Learning Studio for data preprocessing by creating new variables. This involved tasks like transforming variable types or combining multiple variables to create new ones. Additionally, I employed cross-validation techniques, such as k-fold validation, to assess model performance and select appropriate metrics for evaluation.

The most important aspect of my machine learning projects is the quality of the data. It is crucial to determine whether the data can provide meaningful information relevant to the project's use case, regardless of the specific tools or features used.

The drag-and-drop interface of Azure Machine Learning Studio has greatly improved my workflow. It is easy to use and increases productivity by allowing quick experimentation and visualization of data pipelines. This feature enables me to iterate rapidly and efficiently, especially for small projects or presentations.

I would rate the performance of the solution at an eight out of ten for my team. However, our data volume is not the largest. While I believe our performance is strong, other companies might rate it lower due to different circumstances.

My advice for someone considering installing Azure Machine Learning Studio is that it is user-friendly, especially for technical users. You can easily upload data and analyze it with the examples provided. The drag-and-drop interface makes it intuitive, and upgrading to this tool for data analysis is a good idea.

Overall, I would rate Azure Machine Learning Studio as a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for sales forcasting and for creating a pipeline in Azure. We are publishing the pipeline from Azure DevOps, and through the AML endpoint so that the pipeline will run one after the other models. These predictions will be stored and we can visualize everything. 

The designer and notebooks are great. We like the pipelines we are able to deploy and the process is very simple.

The visualizations are great. It makes it very easy to understand which model is working and why.

The setup is simple. 

It is stable and reliable.

I have had no trouble scaling.

Technical support is good. 

The solution cannot connect to private block storage. It does not allow this connection, which is a pain point. The confidential data needs to be removed from the block, and that becomes a security issue. 

In Azure Databricks, how we are promoting the models could be easier. The UI in Daabricks is a bit easier. We'd like ML Studio to be streamlined. 

I've used the solution for about two and a half years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. 

The solution can scale. I haven't used Azure Kubernetes services yet. However, I haven't had issues with scaling so far. 

We have around ten to 20 people on our project using the solution. Many users use it in our company - not just on my team.

I've reached out to technical support. They have SLAs in place that help us to troubleshoot issues. Even critical issues get sorted out quickly. We're using premium Microsoft technical support. 

We also use Databricks. In Databricks, there is no designer module to design pipelines. There are other features available. 

They do behave in the same way; however, in Databricks, I do need to do more configurations and a bit more work with it. Still, it allows me to connect to private blocks, which I cannot do in this product. It also requires me to run job clusters separately. 

Security-wise, Databricks is more secure. 

This is easy to deploy. I did not fid the process to be overly complex. 

The solution has a higher price. I'd rate it three out of ten in terms of affordability. 

I am an end user. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'm pretty happy with its capabilities. 

I usually order a machine for training my models. I build the machine myself to include various images for working with Python or IR. I upload my data and scripts to the cloud and run the training process.

I'm beginning to learn about Databricks, which is a framework that works on Azure, AWS, and GCP. It has more power than the Azure main infrastructure, so I'm starting to explore it for things such as training models. I like all the features that Azure's main infrastructure provides, so I don't have a preferred feature. I think many people will move to Azure Databricks in the future.

The price of the solution has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for almost three years.

I don't have much experience with production environments since they are usually managed by DevOps rather than me when I deploy my work. However, I believe the solution is stable.

The solution is really scalable.

Microsoft has great technical support, which is really beneficial.

The initial setup depends on the developer's knowledge of machine learning models as to whether it is easy or difficult. With a good understanding of these models, then we can get to work quickly in the environment. With 20 years of experience in IT, making applications on legacy platforms and non-web platforms, I have found that Azure has a very good implementation. The platform is so comprehensive that it doesn't matter what kind of work we do, we can find the tools needed to get the job done. In comparison to what I was doing five years ago, Azure is a great platform and I really enjoy working with it.

We should allocate up to 12 percent of our project time to deployment. Depending on the complexity of the solution, we should expect to spend more time on deployment.

Some of our implementations are in-house and others are not. 

The solution cost is high.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I began using Azure three months ago, connecting my local Visual Code environment with the actual environment. This was a major improvement for me, as I can now work and run experiments on my local computer. I'm really pleased with how comfortable I am using Azure on all platforms.

The solution requires a minimum of one developer for maintenance. We need a DevOps developer and the tech lead to define the scope of the problems to be solved. The tech lead will provide guidance and oversight, while the DevOps developer will be responsible for implementing the solutions.

I enjoy working and have no difficulty in recommending Azure Machine Learning Studio to others, however, I recognize that there are many implementations utilizing AWS. AWS is a formidable competitor, so it is essential to be familiar with both solutions. Unfortunately, I have missed out on opportunities because I am not situated in the US. The environment is excellent, however, the large American market and the companies therein rely heavily on our work. This requires me to stay apprised of current developments, such as the widespread adoption of AWS, and learn how to use alternative platforms.

We use Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to generate predictive sales analytics and determine customer behavior.

Through the solution's customer data analysis, we conduct customer data experiments, test hypotheses, and develop sales strategies.

The solution is integrated with our Microsoft Azure tenant, and we don't have to go anywhere else outside the tenant. The solution's data pipelines are easier to configure, and the solution provides a range of tools and libraries we can access.

It would be great if the solution integrated Microsoft Copilot, its AI helper.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for one year.

The solution's stability depends on the fragility of libraries and the availability of services. Sometimes, the demand is very high in the public cloud, and performance and availability issues have occurred.

I rate the solution a six out of ten for stability.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a very scalable solution. Three people are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The solution’s deployment takes one hour.

There is a lack of certainty with the solution's pricing. The risk is the pricing is high without you necessarily knowing. The workload drives the solution's pricing. If you give it a lot to do, it will cost a lot of money. It's about committing to how much you want to pay for. You don't necessarily know what you'll get for the price level that you agree.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

Before choosing the solution, we evaluated Databricks. We chose Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to get as close to the Microsoft pattern as possible. We have a Microsoft first policy, and therefore, unless there's a reason not to use Microsoft, we choose Microsoft.

I would recommend Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to other users. I would also ask users to compare the solution with Microsoft Fabric, which is a collection of components to put a workflow together end to end.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

We have data from our business, and we want to make AI models. The question is how we want to use those models in our business. That's what we're going to do next year.

The product is well organized. The thing is how we will get the models to work within our code. We have some suggestions there, but we want to gain more experience and be ready to answer that because we are currently working on this and don't have all the answers yet.

The tool is well organized. What I am very happy about is the ease of deploying new resources. You can easily create your pipeline within minutes.

One problem I experience is that switching between multiple accounts can be difficult. I don't think there are any major issues. Mostly, the biggest challenge is to identify business solutions to this. 

The tool should keep on updating new algorithms and not stay static. 

I have been working with the product for ten years. 

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio's stability as nine out of ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. I am the single user of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. 

We haven't had any experience with the tool's support because we didn't use it. We are mature developers and don't need it at this time. We don't have any complex business needs.

The tool's deployment time depends on the resource you will deploy. Some resources are deployed within minutes, while others may take more than 15-20 minutes. I have deployed mostly web applications, REST APIs, and databases.

We're trying to provide robust solutions to our customers, which previously involved multiple steps. Now, we're going to provide it in one step. That is our benefit because the customer will get a final solution, not a solution in steps. We will formalize and streamline them to align with our new solutions.

We pay only the Azure costs for what we use, which involves some subscription costs. But essentially, you pay for what you use. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

We are trying to find some commercial value. I have learned how to use it, and we will integrate it into the project. That's our next goal.

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a ten out of ten. If you want to use it, get the certifications, and then work on some projects to gain more experience.

We use the solution to develop prompt flows.

The solution facilitates our production. Instead of running a lot of hard code, I just put my prompt flow in Machine Learning Studio, which takes care of the job.

The product must improve its documentation.

I have been using the solution for six months.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten.

Five people use the product in our organization. I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten.

The deployment is quite easy. It takes a few minutes. I rate the ease of deployment a seven out of ten.

We have already implemented some pipelines on Azure, but it's not similar to what Machine Learning Studio offers. People who want to start using the product must read the box. Some things are not easy to implement. We are only using Azure. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I've had experience working for two distinct companies. My previous employer operated in the telecom domain, primarily focused on telecom-related projects. In my current role, which is in the shipping domain, we primarily manage shipping cases. Furthermore, our current work predominantly revolves around a machine learning platform implemented on storage systems.

In the Machine Learning Studio, particularly the Designer part, which is essentially Azure's demo designer, there is room for improvement. Many customers and users tend to switch to Microsoft Azure Multi-Joiners, which is a more basic version, but they do so internally.

One area that could use enhancement is the process of connecting components. Currently, every time you want to connect a component, such as linking it to your storage or an instance like EC2, you have to input your username and password repeatedly. This can be quite cumbersome. Google, for instance, has made it more user-friendly by allowing easy access for connecting services within a workspace. In a workspace, you can set up various resources like storage, a database cluster, machine learning studio, and more. When connecting these services, there's no need to enter your username and password each time, making it a more efficient process. Another aspect to consider is the role of the designer, and they were to integrate a large language model to handle various tasks, it could significantly enhance the overall scalability and usability of the platform.

I have been working with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for three years. 

I would rate it eight out of ten. 

I would rate it eight out of ten.

Yes, I have worked with Azure in my previous experiences.

There isn’t any such expensive costs and only a standard license is required. 

My company uses Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to help our company's customers view AI solutions.

My company's clients' use cases will be that they use the solution to feed information to the system about their customers who purchase from them. The solution also helps one to combine products to engage in cross-selling and upselling activities while keeping track of customer lifetime value. The solution also helps its users with the pricing simulation part to figure out what prices are good for the business and maximize the closing of the sale.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the availability of ChatGPT in the solution.

Improvement will be possible with more machine learning functionalities in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio since, at times, the current accuracy of the solution is not good enough. It would be good if Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio could have a generative AI tool similar to ChatGPT.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for three years. My company functions as a reseller and a partner of Microsoft.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten. With ML, you may face some data-related issues, especially considering that when dealing with customers at times, the data that comes in might not be clean. Stability-wise, you may face certain problems when you fail to refresh the data in the solution.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten. My company still has to do some of our own optimizations to the data part of the solution until and unless we subscribe to some third-party data lake services, which is a better option but comes at a higher cost.

My company's client's organization has around 10 to 50 users of the solution.

My company caters to the requirements of medium and enterprise-sized companies.

I rate the technical support a six out of ten.

Neutral

I rate the initial setup phase of the solution a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy. The initial setup phase of the solution was a bit complex. The setup phase is a bit difficult if you want to view Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio as an application.

The solution is deployed 50 percent on the cloud and 50 percent on-premises.

Considering the fact that my company currently builds some standard solutions, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio's deployment takes us around two to three months.

I rate the solution's pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

There are some additional payments to be made apart from the licensing fees of the solution since buying Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio alone won't make it a complete solution. You will need the database and data lake services.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio does not allow users to have a PnP option, like an ERP or a CRM system, where everything works if you include the data with the system. Sometimes, it is difficult to generate good patterns using the solution. You need to have good experience with the solution to move around with the data from the beginning before coming up with different strategies to end different problems. In general, the product is not a straightforward solution.

There is a need for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio's users to put in some programming efforts to make the solution work accurately under different scenarios.

I rate the overall solution a six out of ten.