Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Reviews

We primarily use the solution for sales forcasting and for creating a pipeline in Azure. We are publishing the pipeline from Azure DevOps, and through the AML endpoint so that the pipeline will run one after the other models. These predictions will be stored and we can visualize everything. 

The designer and notebooks are great. We like the pipelines we are able to deploy and the process is very simple.

The visualizations are great. It makes it very easy to understand which model is working and why.

The setup is simple. 

It is stable and reliable.

I have had no trouble scaling.

Technical support is good. 

The solution cannot connect to private block storage. It does not allow this connection, which is a pain point. The confidential data needs to be removed from the block, and that becomes a security issue. 

In Azure Databricks, how we are promoting the models could be easier. The UI in Daabricks is a bit easier. We'd like ML Studio to be streamlined. 

I've used the solution for about two and a half years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. 

The solution can scale. I haven't used Azure Kubernetes services yet. However, I haven't had issues with scaling so far. 

We have around ten to 20 people on our project using the solution. Many users use it in our company - not just on my team.

I've reached out to technical support. They have SLAs in place that help us to troubleshoot issues. Even critical issues get sorted out quickly. We're using premium Microsoft technical support. 

We also use Databricks. In Databricks, there is no designer module to design pipelines. There are other features available. 

They do behave in the same way; however, in Databricks, I do need to do more configurations and a bit more work with it. Still, it allows me to connect to private blocks, which I cannot do in this product. It also requires me to run job clusters separately. 

Security-wise, Databricks is more secure. 

This is easy to deploy. I did not fid the process to be overly complex. 

The solution has a higher price. I'd rate it three out of ten in terms of affordability. 

I am an end user. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'm pretty happy with its capabilities. 

I usually order a machine for training my models. I build the machine myself to include various images for working with Python or IR. I upload my data and scripts to the cloud and run the training process.

I'm beginning to learn about Databricks, which is a framework that works on Azure, AWS, and GCP. It has more power than the Azure main infrastructure, so I'm starting to explore it for things such as training models. I like all the features that Azure's main infrastructure provides, so I don't have a preferred feature. I think many people will move to Azure Databricks in the future.

The price of the solution has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for almost three years.

I don't have much experience with production environments since they are usually managed by DevOps rather than me when I deploy my work. However, I believe the solution is stable.

The solution is really scalable.

Microsoft has great technical support, which is really beneficial.

The initial setup depends on the developer's knowledge of machine learning models as to whether it is easy or difficult. With a good understanding of these models, then we can get to work quickly in the environment. With 20 years of experience in IT, making applications on legacy platforms and non-web platforms, I have found that Azure has a very good implementation. The platform is so comprehensive that it doesn't matter what kind of work we do, we can find the tools needed to get the job done. In comparison to what I was doing five years ago, Azure is a great platform and I really enjoy working with it.

We should allocate up to 12 percent of our project time to deployment. Depending on the complexity of the solution, we should expect to spend more time on deployment.

Some of our implementations are in-house and others are not. 

The solution cost is high.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I began using Azure three months ago, connecting my local Visual Code environment with the actual environment. This was a major improvement for me, as I can now work and run experiments on my local computer. I'm really pleased with how comfortable I am using Azure on all platforms.

The solution requires a minimum of one developer for maintenance. We need a DevOps developer and the tech lead to define the scope of the problems to be solved. The tech lead will provide guidance and oversight, while the DevOps developer will be responsible for implementing the solutions.

I enjoy working and have no difficulty in recommending Azure Machine Learning Studio to others, however, I recognize that there are many implementations utilizing AWS. AWS is a formidable competitor, so it is essential to be familiar with both solutions. Unfortunately, I have missed out on opportunities because I am not situated in the US. The environment is excellent, however, the large American market and the companies therein rely heavily on our work. This requires me to stay apprised of current developments, such as the widespread adoption of AWS, and learn how to use alternative platforms.

In terms of what I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I especially love the designer because you can just drag and drop items there and apply the logic that's already available with the designer. I love that I can use the libraries in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, so I don't have to search for the algorithms and all the relevant libraries because I can see them directly on the designer just by dragging and dropping. Though there's a bit of work during data cleansing, that's normal and can't be avoided. At least it's easy to find the relevant algorithm, apply that algorithm to the data, then get the desired output through Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio.

I also like the API feature of the solution which is readily available for me to expose the output to any consuming application, so that takes out a lot of headache. Otherwise, I have to have a developer who knows the API, and I have to have an API app, so all that is completely taken care of by the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio designer. With the solution, I can concentrate on how to improve the data quality to get quality recommendations, so  this lets me concentrate on my job rather than focusing on the regular development of APIs or the pipelines, in particular, the data pipelines pulling the data from other sources. All the data is taken care of and you can also concentrate on other required auxiliary activities rather than just concentrating on machine learning.

As for the areas for improvement in Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, I've provided feedback to Microsoft. My company is a Gold Partner of Microsoft, so I provided my feedback in another forum. Right now, it is the number of algorithms available in the designer that has to be improved, though I'm sure Microsoft does it regularly.

When you take a use case approach, Microsoft has done that in a lot of places, but not on the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio designer. When I say use case basis, I meant recommending a product or recommending similar products, so if Microsoft can list out use cases and give me a template, it will save me a lot of time and a lot of work because I don't have to scratch my head on which algorithm is better, and I can go with what's recommended by Microsoft.

I'm sure that isn't a big task for the Microsoft team who must have seen thousands of use cases already, so out of that experience if the team can come up with a standard template, I'm sure it'll help a lot of organizations cut down on the development time, as well as going with the best industry-standard algorithms rather than experimenting with mine.

What I'd like to see in the next version of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, apart from the use case template, is the improvement of the availability of libraries. Microsoft should also upgrade the Python versions because the old version of Python is still supported and it takes time for Microsoft to upgrade the support for Python. The pace of upgrading Python versions of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and making those libraries available should be sped up or increased.

I've been working with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for nearly two years now.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a stable solution. My company is already using it in production. At least customers use the recommendations from Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio in production, so the solution is quite stable, at least in cases developed by my company.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a solution that's easy to scale. It's pretty easy because it is hosted on Kubernetes, and there is an option in the portal where I can simply move my plan from standard to enterprise. The solution also has an automatic scaling option available because it is on Kubernetes, so it can scale automatically. I'm seeing that it's quite scalable. This has nothing to do with availability because it just runs in the background, and it is not customer-facing, but the output is customer-facing, so availability is a different case, but in terms of scalability, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is scalable.

The technical support team for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio was pretty good, though I had to tailor the answers to my requirement, but would rate support a four out of five. Most of the questions my company had, more or less, the support team already experienced, so the team had answers readily available which means there wasn't a need to do a lot of R&D, so getting answers from technical support didn't take a lot of time.

In terms of setting up Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, initially, when my company started, the documentation wasn't so good, but now it has improved. Provisioning the solution only takes a few clicks, so it's no big deal, but setting up the pipelines because no enterprise will have a single environment, you'll have to create multiple pre-production and end production environments, so moving my latest changes to the next environment was a bit of a challenge.

Many terminologies are now in the market such as DevSecOps, and MLOps, so that MLOps documentation was available initially, but it wasn't very explanatory, but now, there's a lot of improvement in the MLOps documentation and that will help me move and propagate my changes from one environment to another.

Microsoft has made improvements into the tutorials, especially on MLOps. Finding MLOps experts in the market was also very tough initially, so my company was trying to learn on the job and do it, so it took some thinking and time, but it's still good because you can learn on the job and do it, but you won't always have the luxury of time to learn it.

In terms of pricing, for any cloud solution, you should know the tricks of the trade and how to use it, otherwise, you'll end up paying a lot of money irrespective of the cloud provider, so at least for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing versus AWS, I would rate it three out of five, with one being the most expensive, and five being the cheapest. It could be cheaper, but you also have to be careful when choosing the plans, for example, consider the architecture and a lot of other factors before choosing your plan, if you don't want to end up paying more. If your cloud provider has an optimizer that seems to be available in every provider, that would keep alerting you in terms of resources not being used as much, then that would help you with budgeting.

We evaluated quite a lot of options. We compared Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio against Google Cloud and AWS solutions, and there were several others available in the market. I'm trying to recollect the names which we compared the solution with. We did the benchmarking, but we went with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio because our clients and their data were on Azure, though that doesn't necessarily make you go with the solution. After all, you can pull the data from any other cloud as well. For our use case, however, we found many of the things were readily available and the learning curve for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio compared to others was better and easier. We didn't have to search for experts in the market to hire them because we could have our in-house team learn and deliver the solution on the job.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a cloud-native solution. It's completely cloud-based.

My company has eight users of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio.

My rating for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is seven out of ten.

The use cases of this product are primarily for the BFSI; digitization and building machine learning models that provide recommendations for creating analytical insights from extracted data. We also do Jupyter Notebook authoring. We are partners with Microsoft and I'm a practice director.  

The product enables quick data preparation and data processing pipeline as well as modeling work and it's all part of Azure Machine Learning. It also gives us an idea of what machine learning model is good to use because the hyperparameter tuning is done automatically which saves us time and effort. 

Auto email and the studio are great features. 

It's not that easy to master the program, it requires some specific learning. If we want to extend the program to include inexperienced users, it can take some time for them to learn the solution. It would be nice if they added GPU solutions. Most of the solutions coming out now are video analytics or edge computing-based and Azure should have that focus.  

We haven't had any issues with stability. 

We haven't faced any challenges with scalability. If there are any issues, our Microsoft infract team pitches in but we haven't had any serious problems. We have around 25 to 30 customers accessing this solution. Maintenance is straightforward and doesn't require more than one person. 

Customer support is very good, they are prompt and helpful in solving problems. 

Positive

Our switch to AMLS was an organic development that came from the needs of our customers and was based on the quick time to develop and the pre-built machine learning models that the solution has.

The initial setup is straightforward with deployment time depending on the environment. It depends on how many machine learning models we need to develop, the type of resources, the different sources, data volumes, etc. 

We don't deal with licensing, that is something our customers are responsible for.  My understanding is that the cost is $50 for the digitization of 1,000 pages. I think it should be reduced to somewhere between $20 to $30 per 1,000 pages so that we can make a better offer to our customers. 

I believe Azure Machine Learning has a very good pre-built model which enables quick development of solutions, particularly text analytics and cognitive-based solutions. 

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

I use it for forecasting solutions, and building, deploying, and managing machine learning models.

One of the notable advantages is that it offers both a visual designer, which is user-friendly, and an advanced coding option. As designers, we have the flexibility to leverage end-to-end features without having to code everything manually. Additionally, the platform provides convenient options for managing email operations. I appreciate the extensible AI feature; it effortlessly generates a report even in the absence of explicit report instructions.

There's room for improvement in terms of binding the integration with Azure DevOps. I find the process somewhat intricate, especially when connecting to the issue-tracking system. Numerous steps and configurations need to be set up before effectively utilizing Azure DevOps. When it comes to the Home Office Machine Learning suite, I believe it would be more beneficial if there were shared capabilities for internet projects.

I have been working with it for one year.

The stability is impeccable. I would rate it ten out of ten.

I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. Ten users utilize it on a daily basis.

I'm dissatisfied with the technical support; they failed to offer the correct solution. I would rate their expertise four out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup was fairly straightforward. I would rate it seven out of ten.

The deployment was completed within a week by following the guidebook. The in-house implementation was done by one individual. Maintenance is handled by a single individual who monitors the logs.

Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

We use the solution to develop prompt flows.

The solution facilitates our production. Instead of running a lot of hard code, I just put my prompt flow in Machine Learning Studio, which takes care of the job.

The product must improve its documentation.

I have been using the solution for six months.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten.

Five people use the product in our organization. I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten.

The deployment is quite easy. It takes a few minutes. I rate the ease of deployment a seven out of ten.

We have already implemented some pipelines on Azure, but it's not similar to what Machine Learning Studio offers. People who want to start using the product must read the box. Some things are not easy to implement. We are only using Azure. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

The product's standout feature is a robust multi-file network with limited availability. Microsoft has been highly active recently, updating the finer details.

The regulatory requirements of the product need improvement. Many customers, including government clients, need data processing on the cloud. However, because of these regulatory requirements, I cannot use the website's machine learning and data features. I have to do everything manually, which is very time-consuming. I am trying to save the metadata on the cloud and the people's data on-premises. Microsoft should improve the configuration process. Additionally, access to accessible sources from the mobile console should be available.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio as a reseller and lead partner for three or four years.

The solution is stable.

The product is scalable, especially on-premises. It can be scaled as large as you need it to be. It is also good for multiple users and machine learning workloads. You can choose the payment plan that best suits your needs.

However, the level of data protection may be lower than if you were to use a platform specifically designed for SMBs.

We have used Oracle before.

The product's pricing is reasonable. However, we do not have the option to limit data usage. In some accounts, we cannot control data usage and give customers enough budget for their consumption.

They should work on adding a threshold for data usage so that customers can set their limits. It would be a great way to give customers more control over their Azure Machine Learning costs.

I prefer using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, which is a powerful tool that can be used to build and deploy machine learning models. I recommend it for small and medium businesses.

I rate it a seven out of ten.

We're mainly using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to run experiments on our data for predictive analytics.

I like being able to compare results across different training runs. The hyperparameter tuning function is a valuable feature because it provides the ability to run multiple experiments at the same time and compare results.

The initial setup time of the containers to run the experiment is a bit long.

I've been using this solution for about a year.

It's pretty stable, and I have not had any issues. I would rate the solution's stability at nine out of ten.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio itself is not really designed to be deployed. You get the model output from Machine Learning Studio, and then you have to use other Azure services for deployment. Thus, it's not very scalable in that sense.

However, for scalability in terms of machine learning and running different algorithms, I would rate it at eight out of ten. In terms of deploying machine learning solutions, I would not rate it very high. I am the only one who uses this solution in my organization, and we are not planning to increase usage at present.

The initial setup wasn't too complex, and I would rate it at eight out of ten. The documentation was easy to follow.

The deployment took a couple of days. We obtained the data, made it available, and then set up the environment. We tried out different models and ran experiments.

We deployed it ourselves.

On a scale from one to ten, with ten being overpriced, I would rate the price of this solution at six.

If you want to train models on larger datasets, then Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a good solution. If you need to run a few diverse set of experiments with different environments, then it really comes in handy.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio at eight out of ten because it's easy to start using it. Also, it's pretty robust and stable, and the interface is nice to work with.