Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Reviews

I use the solution to create a data flow and map all the databases or users.

The drag-and-drop interface is good.

The solution must increase the amount of data sources that can be integrated. Many customers have different types of data sources. The tool only supports seven out of ten data sources. The tool must increase the integration of data sources.

The tool is used to create flows. Its stability does not matter much as far as it creates the flow. Once we have created the flow, we just need to deploy it in our environment. Once the flow is defined, we put the algorithm in the machine learning node.

The product will be only used by a couple of people who design the flow and the model. There might be only three or four users in an organization with 100 employees.

The product is cloud-based.

The product is not that expensive.

Scalability is irrelevant to the tool. BFSI and IT companies use the product in India. Everyone is trying to leverage AI. The market is going towards AI. I see a lot of opportunity in it. The consumption of AI will increase in the future.

I will recommend the solution to my clients. We can support them because we are a partner with Microsoft. The solution enables customers to design flows using most of the available data sources. They can also create algorithms for predictive analysis. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

I use Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio primarily to develop small-scale machine learning models in the UI and later deploying them to the vendor for machine learning purposes.

I find Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio advantageous because it allows integration with Titan Scratch and offers an easy-to-use drag-and-drop menu for developing machine learning models. In my experience, I haven't identified any specific features that need improvement. I appreciate its simplicity and prefer it not to become overly complicated. For more sophisticated tasks, I would turn to other solutions like DataBricks, but for simplicity and ease of use, Azure Machine Learning Studio works well for me.

In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Power BI within Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. This full integration would enhance the overall functionality and usability of the solution, creating a seamless experience for users.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for the last six years. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the stability a solid ten. From my personal perspective and experience, it has been extremely stable and reliable.

As for scalability, I would rate it a six. While it meets my current needs and expectations, there is room for improvement in terms of scalability for larger or more complex projects. However, considering that Azure Machine Learning Studio is designed as a compact and versatile tool, I don't have high expectations for extensive scalability beyond its current capabilities.

In general, Microsoft is responsive to community feedback, which is positive. However, their first-line support can be quite frustrating and is often considered a disaster. Dealing with the initial support team can be time-consuming and unproductive, as they often lack knowledge about the product or the specific issue being addressed Microsoft should implement better protocols to quickly escalate issues to higher-tier support with more expertise and knowledge about the product.

Neutral

The pricing for Microsoft products can be complex due to changes and being cloud-based, so it's not straightforward. I've been familiar with it for years, but sometimes details about product licenses and distribution can be unclear. For Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio specifically, I would rate the price a six out of ten.

I would recommend Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, depending on the problem you're trying to solve. For our organization, we've seen benefits in marketing, particularly in calculating customer lifetime value. It's useful because it doesn't require much time to develop and provides immediate business results. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I use it for forecasting solutions, and building, deploying, and managing machine learning models.

One of the notable advantages is that it offers both a visual designer, which is user-friendly, and an advanced coding option. As designers, we have the flexibility to leverage end-to-end features without having to code everything manually. Additionally, the platform provides convenient options for managing email operations. I appreciate the extensible AI feature; it effortlessly generates a report even in the absence of explicit report instructions.

There's room for improvement in terms of binding the integration with Azure DevOps. I find the process somewhat intricate, especially when connecting to the issue-tracking system. Numerous steps and configurations need to be set up before effectively utilizing Azure DevOps. When it comes to the Home Office Machine Learning suite, I believe it would be more beneficial if there were shared capabilities for internet projects.

I have been working with it for one year.

The stability is impeccable. I would rate it ten out of ten.

I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. Ten users utilize it on a daily basis.

I'm dissatisfied with the technical support; they failed to offer the correct solution. I would rate their expertise four out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup was fairly straightforward. I would rate it seven out of ten.

The deployment was completed within a week by following the guidebook. The in-house implementation was done by one individual. Maintenance is handled by a single individual who monitors the logs.

Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.

I use a combination of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and Azure Databricks. I mostly use Azure Databricks for building a machine learning system. There are several workflows for a machine learning tuning system that involves data pre-processing, quick modeling pipelines that execute within a couple of seconds, and complex model pipelines, such as hyperparameters. Additionally, there is a setting to set different AutoML parameters. 

For the training and evaluation phase of the whole machine learning system, I use MLflow, for a testing system and a model serving system, which is one core component of Databricks. I use it for Model Register and it allows me to do many things, such as registering model info, logs, and evaluation metrics.

The newer version of this solution has better integration with automated ML processes and different APIs. I feel like it is quite powerful in terms of general machine learning features, such as training data handily by having different sampling methods and has more useful modeling parameter settings. People who are not data scientists or data analysts, can quickly use the platform and build models to leverage the data to do some predictive models.

Azure Machine Learning Studio's most valuable features are the package from Azure AutoML. It is quite powerful compared to the building of ML in Databricks or other AutoMLs from other companies, such as Google and Amazon. It has the most sophisticated set of categories of parameters. The data encodings and options are good and it has the most detailed settings for specifics models.

I have found Databricks is a better solution because it has a lot of different cluster choices and better integration with MLflow, which is much easier to handle in a machine learning system.

The developers for this solution have not been as active in improving it as other solutions have had more improvements, such as Databricks.

Sometimes there might be some data drifting problems and this is what I am currently working on. For example, when our new data has a drift from the previous old data. I need to first work out a solution. Azure in Databricks or in Azure Machine Learning Studio both works fine. However, the normal data drifting solution is not working that well for the problem that I am facing. I am able to receive the distribution change and numerical metrics changes, but it will not inform me how to fix them.

I have been using this solution for approximately three months.

I use Databricks alongside this solution.

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

The product's standout feature is a robust multi-file network with limited availability. Microsoft has been highly active recently, updating the finer details.

The regulatory requirements of the product need improvement. Many customers, including government clients, need data processing on the cloud. However, because of these regulatory requirements, I cannot use the website's machine learning and data features. I have to do everything manually, which is very time-consuming. I am trying to save the metadata on the cloud and the people's data on-premises. Microsoft should improve the configuration process. Additionally, access to accessible sources from the mobile console should be available.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio as a reseller and lead partner for three or four years.

The solution is stable.

The product is scalable, especially on-premises. It can be scaled as large as you need it to be. It is also good for multiple users and machine learning workloads. You can choose the payment plan that best suits your needs.

However, the level of data protection may be lower than if you were to use a platform specifically designed for SMBs.

We have used Oracle before.

The product's pricing is reasonable. However, we do not have the option to limit data usage. In some accounts, we cannot control data usage and give customers enough budget for their consumption.

They should work on adding a threshold for data usage so that customers can set their limits. It would be a great way to give customers more control over their Azure Machine Learning costs.

I prefer using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, which is a powerful tool that can be used to build and deploy machine learning models. I recommend it for small and medium businesses.

I rate it a seven out of ten.

We plan to use this solution for everything in business analytics including data harmonization, text analytics, marketing, credit scoring, risk analytics, and portfolio management.

It allows us to do machine learning experiments quickly.

We did not have machine learning solutions or platform earlier.

It's user-friendly, and it's a no-code model development. It's good for citizen data scientists, but also, other people can use Python, R or .NET code.

If you are on Microsoft Cloud, the development and implementation are super easy.

Every tool requires some improvement. They have already improved many things. They had added new features and a new pipeline.

They should have an on-premise version, other than Python and R Studio, which is only good for cloud-based deployments.

If they could have a copy of the on-premise version on Mac or Linux or Windows, it would be helpful.

It should have the flexibility to work o the desktop. They should have a desktop version to work on the platform.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for almost five years.

It's a stable solution. Microsoft is very stable in general.

It's very scalable because it is using Microsoft cloud compute power.

We want to extend organization-wide, but currently, we are only working on a use case basis.

We have not required help from technical support, but Microsoft technical support comes with it when you subscribe.

Deployment of the tool is simple. Just one click on Microsoft. Once you have procured the license, you can just log in and use it. It's a ready-to-use tool.

When you deploy the solution after analytic development, it depends on the project but it can take anywhere from one month to six months.

Also, depending on the infrastructure, the initial deployment can take one week to a month.

In-house expertise.

The licensing cost is very cheap. It's less than $50 a month would costs for multiple users.

If you want to build a solution quickly without knowing any coding, it's pretty good to start with.

I will take a week to learn, from my experience. For anyone who is interested in trying it, they should start with the free version, which is free for up to 10 gigabytes of workspace.

Just log in and start developing and exploring the tool before onboarding.

I would rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning a seven out of ten.

Our primary use for this solution is for customer service. Specifically, chat responses based on pre-defined questions and answers.

We have reduced the theme size front-line agents by ten percent using the AI elements on chat and email response.

The most valuable feature is the knowledge bank, which allows us to ask questions and the AI will automatically pull the pre-prescribed responses. This reduces our resources and costs.

The user interface that we have is relatively simple.

Some of the terminologies, or the way that the questions are asked, could be stronger. When people use local colloquialisms, it would be better if it understood rather than forwarding it to an agent.

If the frontline efficiencies were improved then we could pass this on to our clients.

Integration with social media would be a valuable enhancement.

I have been using the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for about eighteen months.

The stability is good and we haven't had any issues.

Scalability for us was fine.

We have about seven hundred users including customer service agents, sales agents, and cell phone account managers. It took us about twelve months to scale to this point, from an initial user base of seventy people, and we do not plan to increase usage further.

We've got an internal IT department and we raised inquiries through them. They speak with whoever they need to in order to resolve the ticket.

The previous solution that we were using was based on the Aspect platform. It was fifteen years old, which is why we reviewed it. We weren't able to offer any kind of AI or omnichannel experience using that platform, as its pure telephony. Anything else that we did was piecemeal. We switched because the platform couldn't offer the support that we needed for our clients.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Our deployment took about six weeks, but that was also integrating the new telephony platform as well. For the AI elements, it was probably around five days.

Once the initial knowledge base was set it it took time to build and get it to where we needed it to be. Until that happens you can't really implement the AI element. This is what took about six weeks, so that it covered all of the inquiries that we wanted.

We started with an on-premises deployment and have moved to the cloud.

We performed most of the implementation on-site by ourselves, but we had some help from a consultant to give us guidance.

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to be prepared to take a slow approach to get the best results.

The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this solution is that the strategic outsourcing contact will need to have a strategy for the next three to five years because the efficiencies that we will be gaining from AI will reduce the requirements on physical staff doing traditional roles. However, the support element will increase. It means that the roles will change and evolve over the next three to five years within the UK contact center based on the deployment of AI.

I think that we probably didn't start from the point that would have benefited us most in terms of the AI. Had we put more research into the front end then there would have been a lot less work during the implementation.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

Microsoft Azure Studio allows you to connect to multiple databases and do analysis.

The notebook feature allows you to write inquiries and create dashboards. These dashboards can integrate with multiple databases, such as Excel, HANA, or SQL Server. Connecting to various databases lets you link multiple dashboards or perform data analytics simultaneously. Additionally, the notebook feature supports version control, enabling you to commit code into a repository.

Performance is very poor.

I have been using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio for the past year.

I worked with PowerBI.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is a .exe file that can be installed on your system. It is easily downloadable and open source solution. We can now easily download it from the Microsoft site and use it.

If performance is improved, it can provide a good return on investment because people often make mistakes when they are not familiar with their dataset. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio can pull information from the database and summarize it effectively.

If you want to take design lessons, Azure Machine Learning Studio is the best tool.

The product can simplify some AI-driven projects because it currently has extensive database connectivity. For example, it can easily connect to various databases. However, the support for some other databases is presently limited and can be improved.

It pulls information from the database. Its good analytics capability makes integrations very simple.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.