What is our primary use case?
I am an integrator working with Palo Alto Networks CN-Series and Panorama. I have been involved with the implementation of Palo Alto Networks CN-Series.
What is most valuable?
The stability of Palo Alto Networks CN-Series is excellent. Application control is one of the most valuable features. Its monitoring capability is very good, especially when integrated with Panorama.
What needs improvement?
Palo Alto Networks CN-Series could improve on its pricing as it is quite expensive. The SD-WAN implementation using Panorama needs enhancement because it involves a specific plugin and configuring many elements, making it not very straightforward.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Palo Alto Networks firewalls for around eight years, but the CN-Series specifically for more than a year.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
The initial setup of Palo Alto Networks CN-Series is relatively straightforward. However, the SD-WAN implementation can be a bit tricky due to the need for a specific plugin and configuration of multiple elements.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support from Palo Alto is very helpful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward and can be handled by one person.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of Palo Alto Networks CN-Series is quite expensive, rating around eight on a scale of one to ten for cost.
What other advice do I have?
I have not seen any features with AI in Palo Alto Networks CN-Series but feel it is needed for automation purposes. My overall experience with Palo Alto Networks CN-Series rates an eight out of ten.

