Proofpoint Enterprise DLP Reviews

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is to block business data from getting misused, for example, in case of a phishing email or when there are cloud applications that need to be protected, and for compliance purposes.

A specific example of how I have used Proofpoint Enterprise DLP to block business data or protect cloud applications involves integrating with SOAR tools like ServiceNow, which helps in speeding up the investigation and response times, generates a threat summary to provide automated summaries of complex threats, and protects teams or, for example, Zoom calls using secure collaboration tools by scanning malicious content, URLs, and file sharing.

The best features Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers so far have been related to SOAR tools and the summary. The adaptive email feature helps in identifying if a user is sending sensitive information to the wrong recipient, which is a good example I would like to highlight, along with the ability to identify unique custom identifiers for my business and to obtain specific account numbers or internal ID formats.

The adaptive email feature helps me in tracking and automatically identifying if a user is sending sensitive information to the wrong recipient and provides real-time warning banners to nudge users when they are about to make a mistake or reduce accidental data loss.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has positively impacted my organization by tracking emails and preventing data leaks.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is currently very good. It could become more user-friendly for someone who is not from the DLP field and could also help someone from a finance domain by integrating it with other domains as well.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for one year. With my previous employer, I used it frequently. Here, it is not as frequent because my current organization does not have extensive usage, but for my own projects and a business I am doing, I use it.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is stable.

The scalability is pretty decent and able to scale almost everything for the purpose it serves.

Customer support is good with a quick response and great feedback. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the customer support around an eight because they have been very helpful whenever the need arose.

I previously used a different solution, but I cannot disclose this due to confidentiality.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward. Pricing was relatively higher, but it was still worth it.

I have seen a return on investment. Fewer employees are needed now, and the team has been reduced in number, so time and money have both been saved.

I have seen a return on investment. Fewer employees are needed now, and the team has been reduced in number, so time and money have both been saved.

I evaluated other options before choosing Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, but I cannot disclose the options.

The technology and tool are very useful for my organization, and I do not have many complaints about it.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP will help me in identifying data leaks and ensuring that sensitive information stays within the organization.

Adaptive information protection has influenced my organization's approach to data security to a great extent, and most of the data remains secure.

The unified platform aspect of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very important for my organization because it is sensitive to data leaks, and I deal with data-sensitive information.

Monitoring problematic copilot use is a good opportunity to explore.

My advice to others looking into using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is to know the tool first and then explore other options and compare. Proofpoint is definitely the best.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is incident management.

A specific example of how I use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for incident management is containment; when there's an incident, I ensure that there's no PII that has gone out from our organization.

In addition to incident management, I mainly use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for investigations, particularly when it comes to email security gateway.

The best features that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers are containment and incident management.

What makes the containment and incident management features stand out for me are the speed and level of accuracy.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture of our data and containment within incidents, providing reassurance that PII has not leaked during times of incidents.

Usability has improved over the years; initially, it was difficult to navigate around the tooling, and my only other concern is around the number of products and how it's packaged up, as it gets a bit confusing at times.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can be improved by providing more ease of use and navigation around the toolset itself.

When roadmaps are developed and communicated in conferences, it is always hard and difficult to understand the number of products, what they do, and how they integrate, and where the gaps are within our organization because there are so many products now.

I have not used the LLM classifiers that protect newly developed content.

I think it is quite effective in detecting and preventing data loss through the analysis of user behavior and content; however, I have not fully implemented Proofpoint Enterprise DLP in my organization.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for about four to five years.

I do not have the data on me in terms of response times, but I find it to be a useful tool when I do have an incident for confirming exactly what the breach is and measuring the size of the breach.

There are no further improvements needed for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP that I have not mentioned, only the ones I have already brought up.

I would rate this product an 8.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP involved determining what classification solutions were in place in a couple of projects that we worked on, but the most important aspect was the critical data for the business, and building controls around those data sets and applying those policies was straightforward with Proofpoint compared to other solutions.

It was more about a medical institution that we were trying to help, and for that particular entity, the patient information was critical. The way Proofpoint Enterprise DLP allowed us to build the policies around protecting the data was straightforward and intuitive.

My main use case was around health data, and we knew where exactly the data was sitting. The kind of access towards that data on the communications part or the transfer of the data is where Proofpoint Enterprise DLP really helped.

The best features Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers include the ease of building rule sets, which is quite intuitive, and comprehensive policies for the data sets and the channels. The way we were able to implement it was easy and testable, so I do believe that is the best feature of the product itself.

When I say the rule building process in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP was intuitive and testable, it made life quite easy while guiding us through the process, such as when you have the source, what to apply, and the kind of action you want to take, including alerting sets. It is quite elaborate compared to other solutions, giving you the absolute control that you require.

Being from the consultant side, I can say that the customer was really happy with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP as is. They had a previous solution that never moved into absolute blocking mode, but with this solution and the rule sets that we were able to build for them, we were able to build it out, and I would say within six to eight months, they moved into a proper blocking mode. So it's a win, because DLP solutions tend to drag on for a long time.

The unified platform aspect of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very important for our organization, as the customer used the suite of Proofpoint products, making cross integrations really helpful between different product lines, though other integrations can sometimes be tough, especially with CASB aspects.

Adaptive policy enforcement in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP aids my analysts in responding to data risk with greater accuracy, as we received feedback five or six months after deployment that the adaptive features helped in identifying false positives. Once the learning curve was achieved, it was straightforward.

In terms of improvements, I find there are some blind spots in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP; you can obviously add more channels for detection, and logging can be much improved, specifying exactly what action took place or what alert was generated. There is a bit of ambiguity in that area. Apart from that, I am quite happy with the solution.

From a user experience standpoint, the UI in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can be a bit better. Integration-wise, it would be great if the API or document API could work better with other integrations, as that is a place where we have found it a bit lacking.

I have had worked with the solution on two deployments.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is stable.

From a scalability standpoint, the multi-approach does help, as there are probes for multiple datasets across the domain, though having a single pane of glass to maintain all that would make it even better.

The customer support for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is good and it did help.

When rating customer support on a scale of one to ten, I say seven because anyone can improve all the time; customers can never be 100% satisfied, and as a customer I would expect support to handle queries within minutes.

Positive

As a consultant, I have had exposure to multiple DLP solutions, including Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, in my previous work with Forcepoint. Comparatively to others, I have worked on two or three deployments, and it is a good product.

As a consultant, I have experience integrating, and I find the ease of deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP at least two times better than previous solutions.

The customer who bought Proofpoint Enterprise DLP actually worked with the channel.

I have seen a return on investment.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP was more about providing comparisons between products, and pricing negotiation was done by the customer, so I cannot talk much about it.

Before choosing Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, evaluating other options was my job as a consultant, where I would present different solutions to the customer, and it was up to him to choose which solution he wanted to go with.

I assess the effectiveness of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP in detecting and preventing data loss through user behavior and content analysis, and I would say effectiveness is displayed in that they had a solution which they could never move to a blocking scenario; however, with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP they were able to do it. If the rule sets and data sets are not right, the customer would never have even gone to the blocking mode. It is a continuous process with false positives and negatives, and the solution helps a lot in figuring out what will not work, but there is a gap in pinning out exact problems with datasets.

We have used the auto-learned classifiers within Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, with around 60 to 70% accuracy, as we knew where the data is located, and while the crawlers helped, we faced some problems when different languages, such as Arabic, were in use, which was a challenge for us.

My advice to others looking into using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is to understand the source they need to protect, then pick the solution that suits their environment and use case, understanding the product before buying. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP involves network scanning, email scanning, and endpoint DLP. I have built the solution for scanning on the network, including SSN numbers on SharePoint, OneDrive, and bank credit cards.

I have handled confidential information such as National ID for different countries, so I have worked with various companies and government agencies. I have also worked in the banking sector, deploying Forcepoint solution.

In the banking sector, I get the chance to perform assessments, where I mainly conduct most of the assessments. For a government bank, I was assessing their use of Forcepoint to understand how the Forcepoint DLP policy is behaving as they were encountering a lot of false positives. I found that they had built a policy for blocking the AI chatbot but had exceptions for certain users who could take screenshots from the chat, which they had not accounted for. They agreed that this was problematic.

Additionally, I helped the banking sector increase their DLP coverage, checking for SSN on several servers and SharePoint while expanding to Teams and OneDrive to ensure no confidential details were being shared. That is how I used Forcepoint solution to ensure everything was working properly.

My main use case is typically around DLP solutioning use cases, finding the insider threat for SSNs. I have also developed use cases for fingerprinting, as the organization wants to restrict their tax filings for a UK-based government agency, NHS. They wanted to restrict those filings to only one website, which they attempted with a proxy approach. However, they had exceptions and wanted to track who was sending what kind of files since people used to change the names and upload them to different websites. The company requested if I could create an Optical Content Fingerprinting solution for this, so we built use cases based on that.

I think the best features Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers are its speed and reliability. The number of false positives is fewer compared to other vendors, and I find Forcepoint to be a solid solution. I would recommend it as I have recommended it to a few of my customers. In terms of the DPSM product line evolution, I believe it is far better compared to Microsoft Purview, making it a direct competitor, and in some aspects, it is better than Microsoft Purview.

I believe that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP positively impacts my organization and my clients by reducing alert fatigue. Secondly, the use cases or GUI is easy to use, making it very simple for analysts or new people to train, as it is designed differently.

Regarding alert fatigue, I observe that after using Forcepoint, there is a noticeable reduction in the number of unnecessary alerts. It is easier for new team members to manage these alerts thanks to the user-friendly GUI, which significantly facilitates their training in a real-time environment. My role involves training L1 personnel to assist them with any challenges they encounter, as they know they can contact me directly.

I found that they had built a policy for blocking the AI chatbot but had exceptions for certain users who could take screenshots from the chat, which they had not accounted for. They agreed that this was problematic.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for six years.

I cannot provide an example of how that has helped my team or my clients in daily operations because I do not come from an operational role. My role has always been to assess systems, conduct consulting work, and manage deployments.

To elaborate on alert fatigue, during the worm attack in our environment, the attack was replicating SSNs in the file type, leading to numerous alerts. After we added those file types or the path, I witnessed a reduction in the alerts.

I rate Proofpoint Enterprise DLP a nine on a scale of one to ten because Microsoft Purview is truly a game changer. To be very honest and fair, the way it handles insider threats or risks is much faster compared to other product lines available in the market due to the advantages Microsoft possesses. Predominantly, we utilize Microsoft product lines, which have an edge in managing data theft or data security from Windows machine platforms.

Regarding how Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is deployed in my organization, I honestly have no idea since I do not manage it. I function as a service provider for my company. However, I have experience with on-premises solutioning, hybrid solutions for Forcepoint, and public cloud deployments. I have mostly seen hybrid or on-premises solutions.

In hybrid deployments, I am aware that we use AWS as our cloud provider.

When we do this solutioning for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, we integrate it while considering the costing sheet for hybrid setups. The sales team is well aware of how to manage this.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is monitoring and protecting my company's data, including preventing accidental leaks and monitoring insider threats.

Currently, when making a policy with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, I create different policies. Recently, there was a leakage incident where an insider threat tried to send confidential data to someone who does not belong to the company, and we caught it. We received an alert in the system, and we apprehended the individual.

I believe every service that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP provides is useful for my company. Policy creation is the particular feature I rely on the most with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

The unified platform aspect of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is really important for our company because it protects confidential data. Adaptive information protection with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has changed how we handle sensitive data and respond to threats, allowing us to block sensitive data if it is being shared with external persons.

As an analyst, using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very easy. Any beginner can learn the features because the user interface is very easy to understand and work with. I really love Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

The dashboard of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is great, and I really love it.

Integrating an AI agent along with human oversight could improve Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

I have been working for about a year in my current field.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP was flexible and stable, and I did not have issues with downtime or reliability.

The scalability of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is good, and it can handle growth and changing needs easily.

The customer support for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is very responsive and helpful. I would rate the customer support of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP a ten.

Positive

I have not used a different solution, and I am not sure because I was a fresher and have only worked on Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

Using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has definitely secured my company and its data. I cannot think of any specific outcomes or changes I have noticed.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward, and I did not face any challenges.

Without a doubt, you can just go for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP because it is flexible and any newcomer can really explore it. It is very easy to learn and interesting as well.

I rate this product a nine out of ten.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is to maintain a proper security portfolio and usage for our key data in our organization and to satisfy compliance.

A specific example of how I use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for compliance and protecting key data is that we have two types of critical data. One is personal information with some credit card information that we need to ensure only certain users have access to and that is protected. The second type is certain data that only departments such as Accounts Receivable have access to, and we need to ensure that it is in use.

I don't think there are any other unique ways we're using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP; it's standard practice.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP has positively impacted my organization by keeping us secure and making us aware of whether any critical information is in motion or at risk, and furthermore, whether there are employees that have malicious intent or malicious actions.

Proofpoint helps me detect those risky employee actions by showing alerts on the data that was moved, and it shows us who is doing that and what they are doing. If they have malicious intent, we can identify what they are sending and often who they are sending it to.

The best features Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers, in my opinion, are the interface and the GUI and the interconnectivity of some of their other platforms.

When I mention interconnectivity, I specifically refer to the email product and also the full platform integration that Proofpoint offers. There are a bunch of their other products that we utilize and they have ease of use.

If I had to think of one area that could use a little more polish, I do think putting more and more things into the integration of the full platform and portfolio is great to take multiple risk variants and provide alerts to the security organization and administrators.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for two years.

Those integration aspects are great for our organization. I provided feedback on the features of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP and I appreciate the opportunity to share my thoughts. I gave this review a rating of seven.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP at my company for the last two or three years. When I joined, the organization was already using Proofpoint. I really appreciate it for the email security and their TRAP module and TAP dashboard, which provide pre-delivery or post-delivery protection. I value the post-delivery protection and all of the modules that Proofpoint provides.

Currently, I am using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP specifically for email security. I am planning to explore whether we can use it for data security, as I was not previously aware of that capability. In today's session, I learned about how we can use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for data security, but currently, we are using it for email security only. We use it to find sensitive data in email and to restrict that sensitive data from being forwarded to external email accounts, thus providing email security.

Basically, I am using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP from the email security perspective. I use it to find sensitive data to ensure that no SIN numbers, credit card information, or other sensitive information is shared with external parties or unauthorized users. We have created rules in our email system so that users cannot forward company email to personal email accounts. This type of security has been implemented in Proofpoint.

I recommend using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for email security because we have already successfully used it for that purpose. I would also want to use it for data security to have a better experience. My experience with email security has been really good, as it blocks thousands of emails, whether they are Business Email Compromise, confidential credential compromise threats, telephone-oriented attack delivery, or ransomware attacks. It protects us from thousands of attacks, and I really recommend this tool to others.

First, I really appreciate the dashboard. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP dashboard clearly provides me with a proper explanation of whether a user clicked a malicious link or not and how many emails we have received. If we see one alert that a user clicked on a malicious link and the malicious email was delivered to the user's inbox, we can check in the dashboard how many total malicious emails have been delivered in our environment. Another feature I appreciate is that if a malicious email is delivered to the user's inbox, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TRAP dashboard, if in the sandbox environment the email is later considered as malicious, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TRAP pulls that email from the user's inbox if the user has not opened that email and deletes that email from the user's inbox. I really value that quality. Additionally, we can use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TRAP dashboard to quarantine the email from the user's inbox if the user reports an email. Another feature I appreciate is that sometimes if a user clicks a malicious link, we have the option in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP to automatically disable that user's account. We do not need to worry if a user clicked a malicious link at night, as Proofpoint Enterprise DLP automatically disables that account.

I have already explained the Proofpoint Enterprise DLP Protection Server, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TRAP module, and Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TAP dashboard, and how we can have a unified view if a user clicked any link and how many emails are currently delivered in our account if those emails are malicious, how we can pull that email from the user's inbox, and how we can automatically disable that account if the account gets compromised. I really value these features.

Personally, I believe that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP really adds value among all of the security tools we are currently using in our organization. This is my honest opinion because I really appreciate the support that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP provides and how many malicious emails are blocked by Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, such as Business Email Compromise attack, telephone-oriented attack delivery, and other ransomware attacks. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP categorizes these emails and blocks them automatically in the sandbox environment. I really find it valuable and I believe that during the day, we block thousands of emails, which keeps our organization secure.

Frankly speaking, I currently do not remember the specific metrics, but I know that when I provide a report to my senior management from the last thirty days or a quarterly report, I categorize how many Business Email Compromise attacks, how many telephone-oriented attacks, and how many ransomware attacks have occurred. From the data from the last ninety days, there are approximately three thousand five hundred to three thousand seven hundred emails blocked that are Business Email Compromise attacks that are automatically blocked by Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

I have not worked directly with a Proofpoint Enterprise DLP support engineer account manager. My manager has worked with that. Proofpoint Enterprise DLP definitely has a higher cost compared to other email security tools, but some good solutions come at a cost. The cost value corresponds with their functionality, but the cost is definitely more compared to other tools.

I would now like to use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for data security. Since we are currently using it for email security only, I would like to expand to data security. In today's session, I learned that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can be used for data security and for human-centric AI. I would like to use that module in our organization if possible.

The user interface is quite good and the dashboard is really good. Regarding the support that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP provides, that is already good. I would want to know if we can use it for data security and for Active Directory accounts. For example, if someone tries to log in suspiciously, that account should be automatically disabled. Additionally, if we can use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP data security on the file server, and if users try to encrypt the files, it will detect that and generate an alert, that would be helpful.

I have already explained that I have had a very good experience with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. I am satisfied with the customer support and with the email security. I am also satisfied with the dashboard.

I have been working at the Town of Milton since last year.

Regarding the effectiveness of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, it is really good in cases of email security and analyzing user behavior. If an email is delivered to the user's inbox, I can check whether the user clicked a link or not. I can check in Proofpoint Enterprise DLP TAP dashboard whether the user clicked a malicious link or not and whether there is an effect on the user system by clicking the malicious link. It also automatically blocks that sender if the sender is malicious. I really value that feature.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP's scalability is good and we do not have any issues with that.

The unified platform is really important to find the root cause of the issue, such as how the problem arises, when the user clicked a link, how many users received the malicious email, and what the impact is. To find the root cause and to analyze the attack pattern on how it is entering our environment is really helpful with a unified view.

I am not aware of the Autolearn classifier because perhaps my other team members are working on that. They are the ones configuring Proofpoint Enterprise DLP servers. I do not have any information about this. I am basically checking the alerts and how the email is delivered to the user's inbox.

I do not have any information about previous solutions because I have been working in the organization for the last year, and when I joined, the organization was already using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

Previously Proofpoint Enterprise DLP was on-premises. Now we have migrated it to the cloud. Currently, we are in the process of migration and we have almost completed the migration to the cloud. Only the outgoing bound emails are still on-premises, and we will shortly move those into the cloud.

The team evaluated other options as well before starting to use Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, but when they started using it, I was not yet in the organization. So I do not know which tools they evaluated, but they definitely evaluated other tools as well.

I do not have any information about the investment because I am working on the security alerts and security metrics.

I have provided my feedback on Proofpoint Enterprise DLP and I give this product a rating of ten out of ten.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is helping us monitor who is doing what and who is sharing data over emails, whether within the organization or outside the organization. The most primary use case is securing our data and ensuring customer confidential information is not shared outside the organization.

One classic example is tracking whether any PII information, such as Aadhaar card numbers, account numbers, employee IDs, or professional email addresses in India, are being shared outside the organization.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP provides many out-of-the-box use cases and best practices which help us utilize those and, to some extent, edit them as per our requirements to segregate the data.

Data recovery and classification is valuable, as it classifies where sensitive data such as PII information, IP, or financial data lives and helps classify it according to the data segregation or data category it falls into.

It has helped us tremendously to ensure our esteemed customers that whatever data our SMEs, security practice team, or SecOps team uses or may access from their customer data is being kept safe with us and is not being shared across the organization or outside the organization. That is one of the assurances we can give to customers while relying on Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

I have examples where a few team members or employees mistakenly, or maybe intentionally, shared customer data over email, and those were caught by Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. This triggers an alert to our security team, and they immediately investigate those emails and the data. That helps us educate our employees and set up awareness trainings for them so that they are aware of which data can be shared over email and which should not be.

Currently, it seems to have all the features enabled. However, if Proofpoint could create some custom or out-of-the-box dashboards which help the organization, or CIO or CISO-level people, to get a view of how much data is being shared within a week or month, they could plan internal trainings or speak to their cybersecurity teams to improve the security posture or the use cases they have deployed.

Custom or out-of-the-box dashboards for CIO or CXO level people would help more.

I have been in cybersecurity for ten years since 2016.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is quite stable. I have not seen any downtime or anything of that nature.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is scalable and configurable and can support any kind of infrastructure and any kind of networks. Scalability-wise, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is fine.

Customer support is excellent. They provide support as per the SLAs they have, depending upon the situation and depending upon the case we open with them. Support is perfectly fine.

Positive

We are using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP currently. We did not work on another solution and migrate to Proofpoint.

Integrations, support, and other things are easy to use, more user-friendly and architect-friendly. I do not have anything to add.

We do have a partnership or alliance team who help us in setting up, initiating discussions, or taking them to the final stage or the solutioning stage.

The return on the investment is in securing the organization data, training the people, and making sure that the data which lies with our organization or our department is safe.

The market value or market standard which Proofpoint holds means the cost is as per the services they offer. The licensing model is perfectly fine.

We did not explore other options because we know what kind of services or assurance Proofpoint gave customers, so we chose Proofpoint directly.

Based on our experience and my experience, I usually prefer to recommend Proofpoint Enterprise DLP to customers and friends who are working in other organizations. I convince them with the level of services or level of assurance we are getting from Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. I share my experience with them to encourage them to opt for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

Something that stood out to me most from the seminar is how they are integrating AI with Proofpoint Enterprise DLP and that is very interesting, especially in the current time where AI is affecting so much of data loss. I think that is a very good feature.

Something that we have been seeing recently in the company is how the users and the people at the company are using AI and how that can affect or sometimes leak company data, which is definitely not good in terms of client privacy. Something that can help us catch who is using AI, not company-affiliated AI, is crucial so that we can ensure privacy and protect client data.

The best features that Proofpoint Enterprise DLP offers, based on what I learned from the seminar, include user behavior analysis, content and context awareness features, and cross-channel visibility with email, cloud, and endpoints all covered in one view. Adaptive risk scoring is valuable as well because it helps prioritize real threats instead of alert fatigue.

I feel that the features of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP are good, especially for our company. Data is not just sitting in one place; it moves across, and having everything visible in one place gives us more visibility. Controls are stronger on access and this adds control on usage. For adaptive risk scoring, this is powerful because we can make context-aware decisions.

I feel Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is quite advanced, but there are a few areas for improvement. Since I am in IAM, stronger IAM integration could help us or more transparency in AI decisions and AI-driven risk scoring would be beneficial. Better workflow automation so that we have to do less manual chasing would be good.

A smoother onboarding or learning curve would be something that would be helpful.

I have been working in my current field for about eight months.

I feel it appears to be highly scalable, especially for larger enterprises. It is cloud-native, handles high data volume, is centrally managed, and has elastic scaling. Overall, it does seem well-suited for large distributed environments.

I have heard that the customer support for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is generally positive. Many use cases report the support to be responsive and helpful, and it is well-rated in the market as well. I believe it is good.

We have had exposure to Symantec DLP, which is more of a rule-heavy reactive approach compared to something more context-aware and proactive like Proofpoint Enterprise DLP features with better prioritization and efficiency for analysis.

Based on what I learned, I feel Proofpoint Enterprise DLP appears quite effective, especially because it combines user behavior and context awareness rather than relying on static rules alone. Its real strength is shifting DLP from reactive detection to more proactive risk identification, though its effectiveness would still depend on how well it is integrated and tuned within the organization.

I am not sure if I am in a position of giving advice to others looking into Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, but I would say to treat it as a strategic and context-aware DLP tool and not just as a regular rule engine. I feel that they will get much better results.

I definitely feel time would be saved because most of the regular routine tasks will be automated. That is a plus.

Adaptive policy enforcement basically means policies do not act the same way for every user or every situation. For an analyst, it will allow them to focus on high-risk incidents while automating routine decisions.

The unified platform aspect of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP improves visibility, reduces complexity, and makes security operations more effective.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP sounds to be great software, and it feels to me that it is a strong shift in how DLP is evolving. Instead of just enforcing rules, it is moving forward, understanding user behavior and intent, which is much closer to how real data risks happen. If implemented well, it is less about blocking everything and more about making smarter risk-based decisions, which is where I think DLP needs to go. I would rate this review a seven out of ten.

My main use case for Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is email filtering for both spam and malicious attachments and phishing.

The volume of things that it catches that are important is high. The benefit so far has been that we haven't had any serious compromises as a result of phishing attempts or malicious attachments that came through.

It certainly keeps our users' inboxes clean.

The fact that we haven't had any serious security incidents related to malicious attachments is a testament to the solution's impact on our organization positively.

It saves us a good amount of time, which has impacted our team's workload and our organization's security posture overall.

In my experience, the best feature of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is quarantine management, and the thoroughness of the solution is appreciated.

I have no complaints about how Proofpoint Enterprise DLP can be improved.

I have been using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP for at least 10 years.

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is stable.

The scalability of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP hasn't been an issue so far.

Customer service has been good so far, but I haven't had to address customer support for any issues.

Negative

I did not previously use a different solution.

I was not involved with the pricing, setup cost, or licensing. I am involved with managing the solution.

We have seen a return on investment from using Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, by virtue of how few incidents we have had related to email compromise.

I don't recall if I evaluated other options before choosing Proofpoint Enterprise DLP.

If one is looking for a bulletproof solution, then Proofpoint Enterprise DLP is the answer.

I feel confident enough in the solution's effectiveness in detecting and preventing threats through the analysis of email content and user behavior that I would choose to keep it, even if we switch to Microsoft E5 licenses, and we have had no incidents to speak of related to malicious attachments or malware infections.

I don't really see the unified platform aspect of Proofpoint Enterprise DLP as unified. It's an additional layer, and we are okay with that additional layer of security.