Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
RadView WebLOAD Logo

RadView WebLOAD Reviews

Vendor: Radview
4.1 out of 5

What is RadView WebLOAD?

Featured RadView WebLOAD reviews

RadView WebLOAD mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of RadView WebLOAD in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 3.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
RadView WebLOAD3.0%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.7%
Apache JMeter11.7%
Other72.6%
Performance Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on RadView WebLOAD reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPerformance Testing ToolsMar 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonRadView WebLOAD vs Apache JMeterMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonRadView WebLOAD vs Tricentis NeoLoadMar 27, 2026Download
ComparisonRadView WebLOAD vs BlazeMeterMar 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Apache JMeter3.911.7%88%96 interviewsAdd to research
Tricentis NeoLoad4.110.7%95%66 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise50
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Transportation Company
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
University
4%
Logistics Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%

Compare RadView WebLOAD with alternative products

Learn more about RadView WebLOAD

RadView WebLOAD customers

Related questions

 
RadView WebLOAD Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Test Team Lead at Medtronic, Inc.2.5I find WebLOAD's simple IDE good for web app testing, but reporting is overwhelmingly complex and its setup difficult. It's expensive, leading me to consider alternatives despite its stability and quick process completion.
Software Tester / Quality Assurance Analyst at Bitnami5.0I primarily use RadView WebLOAD for graph testing on programming software. The integrated dashboard is valuable, especially when connected with APM. However, the absence of an analytical dashboard is a notable shortcoming that should be addressed in future releases.
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.0I use this for performance testing, and its reporting is great. However, I struggle with slow technical support and difficulty writing my own code, making it hard to use and leading me to consider other options.
Quality Assurance Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees5.0I value RadView for its API testing, correlation engine, and powerful analytics. It's stable, easy to install, and support is responsive. Though scaling demands resources, it's a cost-effective, quick solution. I'd only wish for JavaScript functional testing.
QA manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I find this product offers great value, user-friendly UI, and is excellent for conceptualizing user experience and testing response times. It scales well and was easy to set up. My only improvement would be for it to pinpoint exact problem locations.
Director, Test Engineering at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.5I find this product very viable and stable, offering excellent support, easy scripting, and real-time stats. My only issues are a script execution bug below 10% and VPN disconnects, but overall, it's effective.
Senior Manager, Software Test Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I find the solution highly valuable, especially its flexibility, ease of use with JavaScript, and seamless AWS integration. Customer service is exceptional, and I've seen good ROI. The only improvement needed is custom reporting.
QA Director at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I value its agenda/script management and flexible user scaling. Initial setup was straightforward, and technical support is excellent. We are still learning all features, faced minor script stability issues, and found the ROI moderate.